Skip to main content
Log in

Marjorie Grene, ‘tTwo Evolutionary Theories’ and modern evolutionary theory

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grene's ‘Two Evolutionary Theories’ (1958), a philosophical analysis of the nature of scientific disputes, itself contributed directly to discourse in evolutionary theory. I conclude that Grene's descriptions of two rival theories of evolutionary paleontologists — those of George Gaylord Simpson, who stressed traditional Darwinian continuity, and of Otto Schindewolf, who stressed discontinuity in paleontological data — were entirely accurate. But I further argue that both Simpson, as well as Mayr and Dobzhansky, had incorporated notions of discontinuity into their earlier work, but later removed, or at least de-emphasized discontinuity, in their later work. Grene's analysis, published in the year of the Darwinian centennial, was initially treated as a provocative sore point. The paper kept the issue of discontinuity alive in evolutionary theory, and directly influenced work in the 1960s and 1970s, which restored and further elaborated on the significance of discontinuity in evolutionary theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bock, W. J. and G. von Wahlert: 1963, ‘Two Evolutionary Theories — A Discussion’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14, 140–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species, John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1937, Genetics and the Origin of Species, reprint edn., 1982, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1941, Genetics and the Origin of Species, 2d edn., Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1951, Genetics and the Origin of Species, 3d edn., Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1971, ‘The Allopatric Model and Phylogeny in Paleozoic Invertebrates’, Evolution 25, 156–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1985, Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1989, Macroevolutionary Dynamics. Species, Niches and Adaptive Peaks, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. J. Gould: 1972, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: An Alternative to Phyletic Gradualism’, in T. J. M. Schopf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco, pp. 82–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and M. Grene: 1992, Interactions. The Biological Basis of Social Systems, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S. N. Salthe: 1984, ‘Hierarchy and Evolution’, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology 1, 182–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, R.: 1940, The Material Basis of Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1980, ‘G. G. Simpson, Paleontology, and the Modern Synthesis’, in E. Mayr and W. B. Provine (eds.), The Evolutionary Synthesis: Perspectives on the Unification of Biology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp. 153–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and N. Eldredge: 1977, ‘Punctuated Equilibria: The Tempo and Mode of Evolution Reconsidered’, Paleobiology 3, 115–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and R. C. Lewontin: 1979, ‘The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B205, 581–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. J.: 1958, ‘Two Evolutionary Theories’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9, 110–27, 185–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grene, M. J.: 1987, ‘Hierarchies in Biology’, American Scientist 75, 504–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R.: 1986, ‘The Dynamics of Peak Shifts and the Pattern of Morphological Evolution’, Paleobiology 12, 343–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1942, Systematics and the Origin of Species, reprint edn., 1982, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1978, ‘Evolution’, Scientific American 239, 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schindewolf, O. H.: 1950, Grundfragen der Paläontologie, Schweitzerbart, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1944, Tempo and Mode in Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1953, The Major Features of Evolution, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M.: 1975, ‘A Theory of Evolution Above the Species Level’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 72, 646–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M.: 1979, Macroevolution: Pattern and Process, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teggart, F. J.: 1925, Theory of History, Yale University Press, New Haven (reprint edn., 1977, University of California Press, Berkeley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.: 1963, ‘On Evolutionary Theories’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14, 146–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S.: 1980, ‘Evolution, Species and Fossils: How Does Life Evolve?’, South African Journal of Science 76, 61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S.: 1984, ‘What Is Species Selection?’, Systematic Zoology 33, 318–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S.: 1931, ‘Evolution in Mendelian Populations’, Genetics 16, 97–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S.: 1945, ‘Tempo and Mode in Evolution: A Critical Review’, Ecology 26, 415–19.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

In admiration of and gratitude to my friend and colleague, Marjorie Grene, on the occasion of her 80th birthday: a paper I have long been intending to write!

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eldredge, N. Marjorie Grene, ‘tTwo Evolutionary Theories’ and modern evolutionary theory. Synthese 92, 135–149 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413746

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00413746

Keywords

Navigation