Skip to main content
Log in

The size structure of a lacustrine zoobenthic community

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Data from Mirror Lake, New Hampshire, are used to construct the first quantitative description of the size structure of a freshwater benthic animal community. Size spectra of the benthic animal community, whether expressed as animal density, biomass, species richness, or assimilation, are generally unimodal. These spectra are strikingly different from the characteristically bimodal size spectra reported for marine benthic communities. There is no indication in these size spectra that the meiofauna and macrofauna are distinct ecological entities in Mirror Lake, as has been suggested for marine benthic communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrassy I (1956) Die Rauminhalts- und Gewichtsbestimmung der Fadenwürmer (Nematoden). Acta Zool 2:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse K (1982) Mass-scaled rates of respiration and intrinsic growth in very small invertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:281–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Banse K, Mosher S (1980) Adult body mass and annual production/biomass relationships of field populations. Ecol Monogr 50:355–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont H, van de Velde I, Dumont S (1975) The dry weight estimate of biomass in a selection of Cladocera, Copepoda, and Rotifera from the plankton, periphyton, and benthos of continental waters. Oecologia (Berlin) 19:75–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman KS (1980) The estimation of individual dry weight and standing crop of harpacticoid copepods. Hydrobiologia 72:253–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton AL, Burton W, Flannagan JF (1970) A multiple cover for sampling profundal benthos. J Fish Res Bd Canada 27:1867–1869

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajak Z, Bretschko G, Schiemer F, Leveque C (1980) Zoobenthos. In: LeCren ED, Lowe-Mc Connell RH (eds) The functioning of freshwater ecosystems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 285–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr SR (1974) Theory of size distribution in ecological communities. J Fish Res Bd Canada 31:1859–1862

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens GE (ed) (1985) An ecosystem approach to aquatic ecology: Mirror Lake and its environment. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre AD (1969) Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol Rev 44:245–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller RE (1975) Hydrophyte biomass and community structure in a small, oligotrophic New Hampshire lake. Verh Int Verein Limnol 19:1004–1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW (1979) Some factors influencing the distribution, seasonal abundance and feeding of subarctic Chrironomidae (Diptera). Arch Hydrobiol 85:302–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearre S (1980) The copepod width-weight relation and its utility in food chain research. Can J Zool 58:1884–1891

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983a) Size structure of the plankton community along the trophic gradient of Lake Memphremagog. Can J Fish Aq Sci 40:1770–1778

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RH (1983b) The ecological implications of body size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Reise K (1979) Moderate predation on meiofauna by the macrobenthos of the Wadden Sea. Helgoländer wiss Meersunters 32:453–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Roback SS (1969) Notes on the food of Tanypodine larvae. Entomol News 80:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson WR, Peters RH, Zimmerman J (1983) The effects of body size and temperature on metabolic rate of organisms. Can J Zool 61:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinghamer P (1981) Characteristic size distributions of integral benthic communities. Can J Fish Aq Sci 38:1255–1263

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinghamer P (1983) Generating ecological hypotheses from biomass spectra using causal analysis: a benthic example. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 13:151–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon RW, Prahash A, Suteliffe WH (1972) The size distribution of particles in the ocean. Limnol Oceanogr 17:327–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon RW, Sutcliffe WH, Paranjape MA (1977) Structure of pelagic food chains and relationship between plankton and fish production. J Fish Res Bd Canada 34:2344–2353

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules WG (1984) Towards an optimal classification of zooplankton for lake ecosystem studies. Verh Int Verein Limnol 22:320–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprules WG, Casselman JM, Shuter BJ (1983) Size distribution of pelagic particles in lakes. Can J Fish Aq Sci 40:1761–1765

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer D (1985) The benthic micrometazoans of Mirror Lake, New Hampshire. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl 72:287–426

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer D, Likens GE (1986) An energy budget for the zoobenthos of Mirror Lake, New Hampshire. Ecology 67:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter RA (1976) The role of the benthic macrofauna in the structure and function of the Mirror Lake ecosystem. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter RA (1985) Benthic maroinvertebrates. In: Likens GE (ed) An ecosystem approach to aquatic ecology: Mirror Lake and its environment, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 204–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick RM (1984) Species size distributions in marine benthic communities. Oecologia (Berlin) 61:32–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1977) Secondary production in inland waters. Adv Ecol Res 10:91–164

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strayer, D. The size structure of a lacustrine zoobenthic community. Oecologia 69, 513–516 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410356

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00410356

Keywords

Navigation