Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-agent interaction processes: From oligopoly theory to decentralized artificial intelligence

  • Published:
Group Decision and Negotiation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the group processes studied in oligopoly theory and in decentralized artificial intelligence. We develop a unifying perspective for the research on the behavior of autonomous interacting agents. Among the many questions of interest in these disciplines are the ways of creating and reaching cooperation by a group of self-interested independent decentralized agents. In this respect, the models and results of oligopoly theory can also be used both in decentralized artificial intelligence and in many other areas of research, such as group decision making, negotiation support, and organizational theory. In particular, the important idea of reshaping goals with strategic information sharing and transmission—incentive communication—has received little attention outside the field of economics. On the other hand, oligopoly theory and experimental economics can especially benefit from the computational methods and tools of artificial intelligence and modern decision support technology. To demonstrate this we have built a prototype of an experimental market analysis environment. Its potential in the analysis of group processes is illustrated with examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • BalighH.H.: 1986, “Decision Rules and Transactions, Organizations and Markets”, Management Science 32(11), 1480–1491.

    Google Scholar 

  • BambergG. and SpremannK., eds.: 1989, Agency Theory, Information, and Incentives, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaşarT.: 1987, “Relaxation Techniques and Asynchronous Algorithms for On-Line Computation of Non-Cooperative Equilibria”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 11, 531–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • BertsekasD.P. and TsitsiklisJ.N.: 1991, “Some Aspects of Parallel and Distributed Iterative Algorithms—A Survey”, Automatica 27(1), 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ConnahD. and WavishP.: 1990, “An Experiment in Cooperation”, in Decentralized A.I., (eds. Y.Demazeau and J.-P.Müller), pp. 197–212, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DaughetyA.F., ed.: 1988, Cournot Oligopoly: Characterization and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • DemazeauY. and MüllerJ.-P., eds.: 1990, “Decentralized Artificial Intelligence”, in pp. 3–13, Decentralized A.I., (eds. Y.Demazeau and J.-P.Müller), Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehtamo, H. and Hämäläinen, R.P.: 1992, A Cooperative Incentive Equilibrium for a Resource Management Problem, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. (to appear)

  • Ehtamo, H., Verkama, M. and Hämäläinen, R.P.: 1992, “On Contracting under Incomplete Information Using Linear Proposals”, in proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Dynamic Games and Applications, Grimentz, Switzerland. (to appear)

  • FoxM.S.: 1981, “An Organizational View of Distributed Systems”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 11(1), 70–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • FriedmanJ.W.: 1990, Game Theory with Applications to Economics, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FudenbergD. and TiroleJ.: 1991, Game Theory, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • GasserL. and HuhnsM.N., eds.: 1989, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II, Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • GinsbergM.L.: 1987, “Decision Procedures”, in pp. 3–28, Distributed Artificial Intelligence (ed. M.N.Huhns), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmytrasiewicz, P.J., Durfee, E.H. and Wehe, D.K.: 1991, “A Decision-Theoretic Approach to Coordinating Multiagent Interactions”, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, 62–68.

  • HoffmanE., MarsdenJ.R., JacobV.S. and WhinstonA.: 1986, “Artificial Intelligence in Economics—Expert Systems Modelling of Microeconomic Systems”, in pp. 1–9, Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management (ed. L.F.Pau), Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • HuhnsM.N., ed.: 1987, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • HämäläinenR.P. and EhtamoH., eds.: 1991a, Differential Games—Developments in Modelling and Computation, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 156, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • HämäläinenR.P. and EhtamoH., eds.: 1991b, Dynamic Games in Economic Analysis, Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, Vol. 157, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • KalaiE. and StanfordW.: 1985, “Conjectural Variations Strategies in Accelerated Cournot Games”, International Journal of Industrial Organization 3, 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, S. and Wilkenfeld, J.: 1991, “Negotiations Over Time in a Multi-Agent Environment: Preliminary Report”, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, 56–61.

  • MaloneT.W.: 1987, “Modeling Coordination in Organizations and Markets”, Management Science 33(10), 1317–1332.

    Google Scholar 

  • MaloneT.W. and CrowstonK.: 1991, Toward an Interdisciplinary Theory of Coordination, Technical Report CCS TR# 120 (SS WP# 3294-91-MSA), Center for Coordination Science, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • MillerR.M.: 1986, “Markets as Logic Programs”, in pp. 129–136, Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management (ed. L.F.Pau), Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • PauL.F., ed.: 1986, Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management, Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prietula, M.J., Beauclair, R.A. and Lerch, F.J.: 1990, “A Computational View of Group Problem Solving”, in Proceedings of the 23rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • SathiA. and FoxM.S.: 1989, “Constraint-Directed Negotiation of Resource Real-locations”, in pp. 163–193, Distributed Artificial Intelligence, Vol. II (ed. L.Gasser and M.N.Huhns), Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, San Mateo, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ShapiroC.: 1989, “Theories of Oligopoly Behavior”, in pp. 329–414. Handbook of Industrial Organization (eds. R.Schmalensee and R.Willig), Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • SmithV.L., ed.: 1990, Experimental Economics (Schools of thought in economics; v. 7), Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • UlphA.: 1987, “Recent Advances in Oligopoly Theory from a Game Theory Perspective”, Journal of Economic Surveys 1(2), 149–172.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.: 1988, “Toward a Theory of Communication and Cooperation for Multiagent Planning”, in Proceedings of the Second Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Knowledge, Pacific Grove, CA, 129–143.

  • Zlotkin, G. and Rosenschein, J.S.: 1991, “Incomplete Information and Deception in Multi-Agent Negotiation”, in Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Sydney, Australia, 225–231.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verkama, M., Hämäläinen, R.P. & Ehtamo, H. Multi-agent interaction processes: From oligopoly theory to decentralized artificial intelligence. Group Decision and Negotiation 1, 137–159 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406752

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00406752

Key words

Navigation