Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Planning the routing mix in FASs to minimize total transportation time

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The routing mix problem in flexible assembly systems is considered. The problem consists of assigning the operations for each part to the machines, with the two objectives of balancing the machine workloads and minimizing the burden of the transportation system. These two objectives are sometimes conflicting, since the latter tends to support assigning operations to the same machine(s) as much as possible, and this may be bad for workload balancing. A linear programming problem is presented that, given a constraint on the workload of each machine, finds one solution that minimizes the overall time spent moving the parts from one machine to another. Since such a linear program may have an exponential number of variables, an efficient column generation technique to solve the problem is devised. The efficiency of the method is validated by experiments on a large number of random problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreatta, G., Filippi, C., and Romanin-Jacur, G., “The Linear Balancing Flow Problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 68–82 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, C., Lucertini, M., and Nicolò, F., “Workload Balance and Part-Transfer Minimization in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 5–25 (February 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Askin, R.G. and Chen, Y., “Multiobjective Evaluation of Flexible Manufacturing System Loading Heuristics,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 895–911 (May 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrada, M. and Stecke, K.E., “A Branch and Bound Approach for Machine Load Balancing in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 10, pp. 1316–1335 (October 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazewicz, J., Eiselt, H.A., Finke, G., Laporte, G., and Weglarz, J., “Scheduling Tasks and Vehicles in a Flexible Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 5–16 (August 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott, J.A. and Shanthikumar, J.G., “Models for Understanding Manufacturing Systems,” AIIE Transactions, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 339–350 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, J.M. and Hausman, W.H., “Simultaneous Determination of Lot Sizes and Routing Mix in Job Shops,” Management Science, Vol. 37, No. 8, pp. 1043–1057 (August 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.L., Sullivan, R.S., Bagchi, U., and Wilson, R., “Experimental Investigation of Real Time Scheduling in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in Flexible Manufacturing Systems: Operations Research Models and Applications, Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 3, K.E. Stecke, and R. Suri (Eds.), pp. 355–378 (1985).

  • Chvàtal, V., Linear Programming, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crama, Y. and Oerlemans, A.G., “A Column Generation Approach to Job Grouping for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 78, pp. 58–80 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosiers, J., Soumis, F., and Desrochers, M., “Routing with Time Windows by Column Generation,” Networks, Vol. 14, pp. 545–565 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbelu, P.J. and Tanchoco, J.M.A., “Characterization of Automated Guided Vehicles Dispatching Rules,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 22, pp. 1075–1097 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frein, Y., Dallery, Y., Pierrat, J.-J., and David, R., “Optimisation du Routage des Pièces dans un Atelier Flexible par des Méthodes Analytiques,” RAIRO Automatique, Productique, Informatique Industrielle, Vol. 22, pp. 489–508 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, P.C. and Gomory, R.E., “A Linear Programming Approach to the Cutting Stock Problem,” Operations Research, Vol. 9, pp. 849–859 (November 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grötschel, M., Lovasz, L., and Schrijver, A., “The Ellipsoid Method and its Consequences in Combinatorial Optimization,” Combinatorica, Vol. 1, pp. 169–197 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, J., Leong, K., Snyder, D., and Ward, P., “Scheduling Approaches for Random Job Shop Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 29, pp. 1053–1067 (May 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaumard, B., Hansen, P., and Poggi de Aragão, M., “Column Generation Methods for Probabilistic Logic,” ORSA Journal on Computing, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 135–148 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouvelis, P. and Lee, H.L., “Block Angular Structures and the Loading Problem in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Operations Research, Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 666–676 (July-August 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., “Loading Models in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” in Recent Developments in Flexible Manufacturing Systems and Allied Areas, A.Raouf, and S.I.Ahmad (Eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E.J. and Mirchandani, P.B., “Concurrent Routing, Sequencing, and Setups for a Two-Machine Flexible Manufacturing Cell,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 256–264 (June 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachamadugu, R. and Stecke, K.E., “Classification and Review of FMS Scheduling Procedures,” Production Planning and Control, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 2–20 (January 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, S., Sarin, S.C., and Chen, C.S., “A Model and a Solution Approach for the Machine Loading and Tool Allocation Problem in a Flexible Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 637–645 (April 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro, C.C., Minoux, M., and Penna, M.C., “An Optimal Column Generation-with-Ranking Algorithm for Very Large Scale Set Partitioning Problems in Traffic Assignment,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 41, pp. 232–239 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ro, I.K. and Kim, J.I., “Multi-criteria Operational Control Rules in Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMSs),” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 47–63 (January 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, S.C. and Chen, C.S., “The Machine Loading and Tool Allocation Problem in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 25, pp. 1081–1094 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, K. and Srinivasulu, A., “Some Solution Methodologies for Loading Problems in a Flexible Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 1019–1034 (June 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, K. and Tzen, Y.J., “A Loading and Dispatching Problem in a Random Flexible Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 579–595 (March 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M.S., Agnetis, A., and Askin, R.G., “Tool Addition Strategies for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 287–310 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E., “Formulation and Solution of Nonlinear Integer Production Planning Problems in Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 273–288 (March 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E., “Design, Planning, Scheduling, and Control Problems of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” Annals of Operations Research Vol. 3, pp. 3–12 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E. and Kim, I., “Study of FMS Part Type Selection Approaches for Short Term Production Planning,” International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7–29 (April 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E. and Kim, I., “Performance Evaluation for Systems of Pooled Machines of Unequal Sizes: Unbalancing versus Balancing,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 22–38 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E. and Morin, T.L., “The Optimality of Balancing Workloads in Certain Types of Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 20, pp. 68–82 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E. and Solberg, J.J., “Loading and Control Policies for Flexible Manufacturing Systems,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 19, pp. 481–490 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stecke, K.E. and Solberg, J.J., “The Optimality of Unbalancing both Workloads and Machine Group Sizes in Closed Queuing Networks of Multiserver Queues,” Operations Research, Vol. 33, No. 4, pp. 882–910 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilhelm W.E. and Shin H., “Effectiveness of Alternate Operations in Flexible Manufacturing System,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 65–79.

  • Yamamoto, M. and Nof, S., “Scheduling/Rescheduling in the Manufacturing Operating System Environment,” International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 705–722 (April 1985).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, Via Buonarroti 12-00185, Roma

    Alessandro Agnetis

Authors
  1. Alessandro Agnetis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agnetis, A. Planning the routing mix in FASs to minimize total transportation time. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 8, 131–157 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394501

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394501

Key Words

Search

Navigation