Mytilus edulis planulatus: an “integrator” of cadmium pollution?

Abstract

Mussels, Mytilus edulis planulatus, were collected from Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia, in February 1984, to test the assumption that they are “integrators” of cadmium pollution. Groups of mussels were subjected to the same average dose of cadmium (21 μg l^-1), administered according to different dosing regimes over 4 wk (Regimes 1, 2, 3, 5); other groups received twice the average dose (42 μg l^-1) in half the time (Regime 4). During each regime, the mussels were exposed to the different cadmium concentrations for one week at each concentration. Nominally, the regimes were: (1) 36 μg (Wk 1) to 26 μg (Wk 2) to 16 μg (Wk 3) to 6 μg (Wk 4) Cd l^-1; (2) 6 to 16 to 26 to 36 μg Cd l^-1; (3) 21 to 21 to 21 to 21 μg Cd l^-1; (4) 42 to 42 μg Cd l^-1; (5) 42 to 42 μg Cd l^-1 to background (<0.5 μg) to background. Differences in cadmium accumulation by mussels from Regimes 1 and 4 were not statistically significant, nor were differences in accumulation between mussels from Regimes 2 and 3. However, mussels from Regimes 1 and 4 had accumulated significantly more cadmium than had mussels from Regimes 2 and 3. Accumulation by mussels from Regime 5 was not significantly different from that by mussels from any of the other regimes. These results suggest that, at least for cadmium, the assumption that mussels are “integrators” of pollution should be treated with caution. They also have implications with regard to the quantitative biological monitoring of pollution. For example, even in a carefully controlled monitoring program, using mussels of standard size and condition, significant differences in cadmium content between mussels need not indicate exposure to different levels of contamination. Rather, these differences could reflect differences in the regime by which the contamination was received.