Skip to main content
Log in

Salinity and substratum effects on condition index of the bivalve Rangia cuneata

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The condition index (CI) of the clam Rangia cuneata was measured monthly at 8 stations in 2 substrate types and 3 salinity regimes in the James River estuary, Virginia, USA. CI was higher in clams from sand bottoms than from mud, and decreased in both substrata in fresher water. Values were lowest in early spring and at a maximum in early autumn, with a pronounced autumn peak in the sand substratum. This pattern coincided with the annual salinity cycle. A field experiment showed that some factor associated with the water overlying a sand or mud substratum, rather than the nature of the substratum itself, was important in determining CI. The hypothesis is presented that this factor may be the higher suspended solids concentrations measured immediately over mud bottoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Baird, R.H.: Measurement of condition index in mussels and oysters. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer 23, 249–257 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, W.B. and J.W. Anderson: The physiological response of the estuarine clam Rangia cuneata (Gray) to salinity. I. Osmoregulation. Physiol. Zoöl. 45, 255–260 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, T.D.: Reproduction and recruitment of the brackish water clam Rangia cuneata in the James River, Virginia. Fish. Bull. U.S. 73, 412–430 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chipman, W.A.: Seasonal changes in the fattening of oysters. Conv. Addr. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 1947, 28–32 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle, J.B.: The condition of oysters as measured by the carbohydrate cycle, the condition factor and the percent dry weight. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 41, 20–25 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  • — The seasonal significance of total solids of oysters in commercial exploitation. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 48, 72–78 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbanks, L.D.: Biodemographic studies of the clam Rangia cuneata Gray. Tulane Stud. Zool. 10, 3–47 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J.L. and H.W. Wells: Northern range extension and winter mortality of Rangia cuneata. Nautilus 83, 22–25 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtsoff, P.S.: The American oyster Crassostrea virginica Gmelin. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 64, 1–480 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haven, D.: Seasonal cycle of condition index of oysters in the York and Rappahannock Rivers. Proc. natn. Shellfish. Ass. 51, 42–66 (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, S.H., J.W. Anderson and K. Horvath: The brackish water clam Rangia cuneata as indicator of ecological effects of salinity changes in coastal waters, 250 pp. Rep. to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississipi, Contract Rep. H-73-1 (1973)

  • — and J.D. Andrews: Rangia cuneata on the east coast: thousand mile range extension or resurgence? Science, N.Y. 167, 868–869 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Korringa, P.: Recent advances in, oyster biology. Q. Rev. Biol. 27, 266–365 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  • Loosanoff, V.L.: Effects of turbidity on some larval and adult bivalves. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 14, 80–95 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • — and J.B. Engle: Effect of different concentrations of microorganisms on the feeding of cysters (O. virginica). Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S. 51, 31–57 (1947)

    Google Scholar 

  • Medcof, J.C. and A.W.H. Needler: The influence of temperature and salinity on the condition index of oysters (Ostrea virginica). Fish. Res. Bd Can. 5, 253–257 (1941)

    Google Scholar 

  • Peddicord, R.K.: Growth and condition of Rangia cuneata in the James River, Virginia, 116 pp. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Va. 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • — Effects of substratum on growth of the bivalve Rangia cuneata Gray, 1831. Veliger, 18, 398–404 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfitzenmeyer, H.T.: Project C. Benthos. Spec. Rep. Univ. Maryl. nat. Resour. Inst. 3, 26–38 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • — and K.G. Drobeck: The occurrence of the brackish water clam, Rangia cuneata, in the Potomac River, Maryland. Chesapeake Sci. 5, 209–215 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  • Picken, L.E.R.: The mechanism of urine formation in invertebrates. II. The excretory mechanism in certain molluscs. J. exp. Biol. 14, 20–34 (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, W.T.W.: The energetics of osmotic regulation in brackish and freshwater animals. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole 31, 618–630 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D.M. and D.A. Campbell: Environmental factors affecting growth in Venus mercenaria. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1, 2–17 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, H.G.: Animals of the seashore, 29 pp. Boston: Bruce Humphries 1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenore, K.R., D.B. Horton and T.W. Duke: Effects of bottom substrate on the brackish water bivalve Rangia cuneata. Chesapeake Sci. 9, 238–248 (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, M.L.: A checklist of the biota of lower Chesapeake Bay, Spec. scient. Rep. Va Inst. mar. Sci. 65, 1–290 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, H.W.: The fauna of oyster beds with special reference to the salinity factor. Ecol. Monogr. 31, 239–266 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodburn, K.D.: Clams and oysters in Charlotte County and vicinity. Bull. Fla St. Bd Conserv. mar. Lab. No. 62-12, 1–29 (1962).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J.S. Pearse, Santa Cruz

Virginia Institute of Marine Science Contribution No. 782.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Peddicord, R.K. Salinity and substratum effects on condition index of the bivalve Rangia cuneata . Mar. Biol. 39, 351–360 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391938

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391938

Keywords

Navigation