Skip to main content
Log in

The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper shows that plant and firm size in manufacturing, and especially in engineering industry, in several Western industrial countries has declined since the early 1970s. Two hypotheses explaining the decline are advanced. One is “de-glomeration” or specialization: the divestiture of non-core businesses in order to free up scarce resources (particularly management time) to defend and nurture core business activities. The second hypothesis is that the emergence of new computer-based technology has improved the quality and productivity of small and medium scale production relative to standardized mass-production techniques which dominated previously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 69 (November), 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1988, ‘Employment Generation and Firm Size in the U.S. and West Germany’, Discussion Paper, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

  • Acs, Zoltan J., David B. Audretsch, and Bo Carlsson, 1988, ‘Flexible Technology and Firm Size’, RPIE Working Paper, Case Western Reserve University.

  • Altshuler, Alan, et al., 1984, The Future of the Automobile. The Report of MIT's International Automobile Program, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, David L., 1981, ‘Who Creates Jobs?,’ The Public Interest 65 (Fall), 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1984, ‘The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective,’ Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1987, ‘Flexible Manufacturing and U.S. Trade Performance’, Case Western Reserve University, Research Program in Industrial Economics (RPIE) Working Paper.

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1988, ‘Flexibility and the Theory of the Firm’, Case Western Reserve University, Research Program in Industrial Economics Working Paper, forthcoming in the International Journal of Industrial Organization.

  • Carlsson, Bo, Erik Dahmen, Anders Grufman, Märtha Josefsson, and Johan Örtengren, 1979, Teknik och Industristruktur — 70-talets ekonomiska kris i historisk belysning (Technology and Industrial Structure — the Economic Crisis of the 70s in Historical Perspective), Stockholm: Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Sciences (IVA).

  • Duché, Genevieve and Suzane Savey, 1987, ‘The Rising Importance of Small and Medium-Sized Firms: Towards a New Industrial System?’, in F. E. I. Hamilton (ed.), Industrial Change in Advanced Economies, London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Charles and Staffan, Jacobsson, 1987, ‘The Diffusion of Industrial Robots in the OECD Countries and the Impact Thereof’, Robotics 3 (March), 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Charles and Staffan Jacobsson, 1988, Flexible Automation. The Global Diffusion of New Technology in the Engineering Industry, London: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Bruce and Lars-Erik Gadde, 1983, Automotive Component Supply Strategies, Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudgin, G. 1984, ‘P. M. E. et créations d'emplois. Le cas exemplaire du Royaume-Uni’, in Les P.M.E. créent-elles des emplois? Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Donald A., 1986, Automation Technology and Industrial Renewal. Adjustment Dynamics in the U.S. Metal-working Sector, Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, Ken-ichi, 1987, ‘Network Industrial Organization in Japan’, Paper presented at the International Workshop on New Issues in Industrial Economics, Case Western Reserve University, June.

  • Leclerc, E., 1984, ‘Modernisation des P.M.I. japonaises et mutations des structures productives’, in Les P.M.E. créent-elles des emplois? Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, David E. and Laurence Shumann, 1985, ‘Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand’, American Economic Review 75 (September), 758–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J. and Charles F. Sabel, 1984, The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscraft, David J. and F. M. Scherer, 1987, ‘Life after Takeover’, Journal of Industrial Economics XXXVI (December), 147–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosegger, Gerhard, 1986, ‘International Rivalry and Cooperation: The Case of the U.S. Automobile Industry’, Case Western Reserve University, Research Program in Industrial Economics Working Paper.

  • Scherer, F. M., 1988, ‘Corporate Takeovers: The Efficiency Arguments’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 2 (Winter), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, William G., 1982, ‘Causes of Increased Competition in the Economy, 1939–1980’, Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Lawrence J., 1982, ‘The Automobile Industry’, in Walter Adams (ed.), The Structure of American Industry, sixth edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, B. The evolution of manufacturing technology and its impact on industrial structure: An international study. Small Bus Econ 1, 21–37 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389914

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389914

Keywords

Navigation