Skip to main content
Log in

Does the hazard rate for new plants vary between low- and high-tech industries?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on a longitudinal data base the hazard rates of over 12000 newly established plants in U.S. manufacturing industry in 1976 are estimated and then compared between low and high-tech industries. It is found that the hazard rate differs across industries, and it also varies between low and high-tech industries. The hazard rate in lowtech industries is reduced in the presence of scale economies, whereas the exposure to risk tends to be higher in high-tech industries. The influence of start-up size in reducing the hazard rate is apparently similar between low and high-tech industries, but its role is found to be more important in the high-technological industries. Market growth and R&D intensity exert no influence on the hazard rate in either the low- or high-tech industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1989a, ‘Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing’, Economica 56, 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1989b, ‘Births and Firm Size’, Southern Economic Journal 56, 467–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1991, ‘New-Firm Survival and the Technological Regime’, Review of Economics and Statistics 60, 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B and Talat Mahmood, 1991, ‘The Rate of Hazard Confornting New Firms and Plants in U.S. Manufacturing’, Discussion Paper, FS IV 91-7, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.

  • Baldwin, John and Paul Gorecki, 1991, ‘Entry, Exit and Productivity Growth’, in Paul Geroski and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.), Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991, pp. 244–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, Josef and Rudolf Schüssler, 1990, ‘Organizational Mortality: The Liabilities of Newness and Adolescence’, Administrative Science Quaterly 35, 530–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comanor, Williams S. and Thomas A. Willson, 1967, ‘Advertising, Market Structure, and Performance’, Review of Economics and Statistics 49, 423–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, David R., 1972, ‘Regression Models and Lifetables (with Discussion)’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 34, 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, David R., 1975, ‘Partial Likelihood’, Biometrics 62, 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Timothy, J. Roberts Mark and Larry Samuelson, 1988, ‘Paterns of Firms Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries’, Rand Journal of Economics 19, 495–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, Timothy, J. Roberts Mark and Larry Samuelson, 1989, ‘The Growth and Failure of U.S. Manufacturing Plants’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 104, 671–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David S., 1987a, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Growth, Size, and Age: Estimates for 100 Manufacturing Industries’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David S., 1987b, ‘Tests of Alternative Theories of Firms Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 95, 654–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, Paul and Joachim Schwalbach (eds.), 1991, Entry and Market Contestability: An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Bronwyn H., 1987, ‘The Relationship Between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the U.S. Manufacturing Sector’, Journal of Industrial Economics 35, 583–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, Boyan, 1982, ‘Selection and Evolution of Industry’, Econometrica 50, 649–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, Nicholas M., 1988, ‘Economic Duration Data and Hazard Functions’, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 646–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, James, 1986, ‘Entry and Exit on the Competitive Fringe’, Southern Economic Journal, 52, 640–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, Dale, 1974, ‘The Determinants of Entry: A Study of the Canadian Manufacturing Industries’, Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 58–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Bruce D. and Bruce A. Kirchhoff, 1989, ‘Formation, Growth and Survival: Small Firm Dynamics in the U.S. Economy’, Small Business Economics 1, 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1991, ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1991, pp. 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. and David Ross, 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, third edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Sidney G., 1984, ‘Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological Regimes’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation 5, 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mahmood, T. Does the hazard rate for new plants vary between low- and high-tech industries?. Small Bus Econ 4, 201–209 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389475

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00389475

Keywords

Navigation