Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recent emergence in the industrial organization literature of a wave of studies identifying small firms as more innovative than their larger counterparts poses something of a paradox? Where do small firms get their knowledge generating inputs? The purpose of this paper is to link innovative inputs to innovative outputs. This enables the identification of the extent to which spillovers exist from major sources generating new economic knowledge, such as the research and development (R&D) laboratories of private and public firms, as well as universities, to the innovative activity of large and small enterprises. Based on twenty Italian regions over a period of nine years, the emprical evidence suggests that, while firm R&D expenditures contribute to the generation of innovative output for all firms, as well as for large and small firms, the spillovers from university research are apparently more important for small-firm innovation than for large-firm innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AcsZoltan J. and David B.Audretsch (eds.), 1993, Small Firms and Entrepreneurship: An East-West Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AcsZoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’, American Economic Review 78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • AcsZoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1990, Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • AcsZoltan J., David B.Audretsch and Maryann P.Feldman, 1992, ‘Real Effects of Academic Research: Comment’, American Economic Review 82, 363–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • AcsZoltan J., David B.Audretsch and Maryann P.Feldman, 1994, ‘R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 77, 336–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • AudretschDavid B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B. and Maryann P. Feldman, 1996, ‘R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production’, American Economic Review 86.

  • Audretsch, David B. and Paula Stephan, 1996, ‘How Localized Are Networks in Biotechnology?’ American Economic Review 86.

  • AudretschDavid B. and MarcoVivarelli, 1995, ‘New-Firm Formation in Italy: A First Report’, Economics Letters 48, 77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BagnascoArnaldo, 1977, Tre Italie. La Problematica Territoriale dello Sviluppo Italiano, Bologna: II Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • BaldwinWilliam L. and John T.Scott, 1987, Market Structure and Technological Change, London: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • BecattiniGiacomo (eds.), 1987, Mercato e Forze Locali: Il Distrettto Industriale, Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • BoundJohn, ClintCummins, ZviGriliches, Bronwyn H.Hall and AdamJaffe, 1984, ‘Who Does R&D and Who Patents?’ in ZviGriliches (ed.), R&D, Patents and Productivity, Chicago: University of Chicago, pp. 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenWesley M. and Richard C.Levin, 1989, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure’, in RichardSchmalensee and RobertWillig (eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, Volume II, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 1105–1107.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenWesley M. and StevenKlepper, 1991, ‘Firm Size versus Diversity in the Achievement of Technological Advance’, in Zoltan J.Acs and David B.Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 182–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • CohenWesley M. and StevenKlepper, 1992, ‘The Tradeoff between Firm Size and Diversity in the Pursuit of Technological Progress’, Small Business Economics 4, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • FeldmanMaryann P., 1994a, ‘Knowledge Complementarity and Innovation’, Small Business Economics 6, 363–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • FeldmanMaryann P., 1994b, The Geography of Innovation, Boston: Kluwer Acadmic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • GalbraithJohn K., 1956, American Capitalism: The Concept of Counterveiling Power, Revised Edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • GrilichesZvi, 1979, ‘Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth’, Bell Journal of Economics 10, 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • HsiaoCheng, 1986. Analysis of Panel Data, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • JaffeAdam B., 1986, ‘Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits and Market Value’, American Economic Review 76, 984–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • JaffeAdam B., 1989, ‘Rea; Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • KleinknechtAlfred, 1989, ‘Firm Size and Innovation: Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industry’, Small Business Economics 1, 215–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • KleinknechtAlfred, Tom P.Poot and Jeroen O. N.Reijnen, 1991, ‘Technical Performance and Firm Size: Survey Results from the Netherlands’, in Zoltan J.Acs and David B.Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 84–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • KrugmanPaul, 1991, Geography and Trade, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LinkAlbert N. and JohnRees, 1990, ‘Firm Size, University Based Research, and the Returns to R&D’, Small Business Economics 2, 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • LinkAlbert N. and JohnRees, 1991, ‘Innovative Behavior in Small-Sized Firms’, Small Business Economics 3, 179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • LovemanGary and WernerSengenberger, 1991, ‘The Reemergence of Small-Scale Production: An International Perspective’, Small Business Economics 3, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarshallAlfred, 1920, Principles of Economics, Eighth Edition, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • MarxKarl, 1912, Capital, translated by Ernest Untermann, Volume I, Chicago: Kerr.

    Google Scholar 

  • OnidaFabrizio and FrancoMalerba, 1989, ‘R&D Cooperation between Industry, Universities and Research Organizations in Europe’, Technovation 9, 131–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • PavittKeith, M.Robson and J.Townsend, 1987, ‘The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945–1983’, The Journal of Industrial Economics 55, 291–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • RothwellRoy, 1989, ‘Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change’, Small Business Economics 1, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • SantarelliEnrico and AlessandroSterlacchini, 1990, ‘Innovation, Formal versus Informal R&D, and Firm Size: Some Evidence from Italian Manufacturing Firms’, Small Business Economics 2, 223–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchererF. M., 1967, ‘Market Structure and the Employment of Scientists and Engineers’, American Economic Review 57, 524–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchererF. M., 1982, ‘Inter-Industry Technology Flows in the United States’, Research Policy 11, 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SchererF. M., 1984, Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchererF. M., 1991, ‘Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem’, in Zoltan J.Acs and David B.Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchererF.M., 1992, ‘Schumpeter and Plausible Capitalism’, Journal of Economic Literature 30, 1416–1433.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchumpeterJoseph Alois, 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • SchwalbachJoachim and Klaus F.Zimmerman, 1991, ‘A Poisson Model of Patenting and Firm Structure in Germany’, in Zoltan J.Acs and David B.Audretsch (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change: An International Comparison, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylos-LabiniPaolo, 1986, Le classi sociali negli anni '80, Roma: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR), Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785, Berlin 30, Germany

    David B. Audretsch & Marco Vivarelli

  2. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Reichpietschufer 50, D-10785, Berlin 30, Germany

    David B. Audretsch & Marco Vivarelli

  3. Universita Cattolica di Piacenza, Italy

    David B. Audretsch & Marco Vivarelli

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marco Vivarelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audretsch, D.B., Vivarelli, M. Firms size and R&D spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Small Bus Econ 8, 249–258 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388651

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00388651

Keywords

Search

Navigation