Effects of “skeleton” photoperiods and high frequency light-dark cycles on the rhythm of cell division in synchronized cultures of Euglena

Summary

Two further lines of evidence support the contention (Edmunds, 1966) that the cell cycle in autotrophically grown Euglena can be coupled to an endogenous, circadian biological clock under certain conditions. So-called “skeleton” photoperiods (LD: 3,6,3:12 and LD: 4,4,4:12) following a complete photoperiod regime entrain the cell division rhythm in the population to a precise 24 hr period, although the step-sizes of the successive fission bursts are always less than 2.00, indicating that not all cells divide in any one 24 hr interval. These findings imply that the continuous action of light is not required for synchronization and suggest that the putative oscillation underlying the rhythm can be phased by discrete light (or dark) “pulses” or signals.

The effects of high frequency LD cycles whose periods were integral submultiples of 24 hr were also investigated. In most regimes (LD:1/4,1/2; LD:1/2,1; LD: 1,2; LD: 1,3; LD: 2,4; LD: 2,6; LD: 4,4) synchronous cell division iccurred in the culture with an average period of 26–27 hr, although only a fraction of the cells divided during any one burst. Similar results were obtained if (i) a synchronized culture was exposed to certain high frequency cycles whose periods were not integral submultiples of 24 hr (e.g., LD: 5,5 or LD: 8,8); (ii) an asynchronous culture (grown in LL) was subsequently exposed to a high frequency cycle; or (iii) a synchronized culture was subjected to a “random” LD cycle. The synchrony does not break down as long as the given LD regime is imposed and shows some indications of persistence in certain ensuing conditions of continuous illumination.

A general formula was derived which predicts the time of division, t _D , for an individual cell: t _D =k+nτ, where k is the initial phase delay, n is an integer, and τ is the free-running period of the rhythm observed in the population. These results are interpreted as indicating that the high frequency cycles employed were unable to entrain the circadian oscillation(s) hypothesized to underly and gate cell division, with the result that the rhythm reverted to its free-running period. Exposure to such cycles, however, apparently either initiates a rhythm or synchronizes the phases of the individual oscillations in the populations of cells. The possible direct interaction between energy supply and the observed somewhat variable period lengths is discussed; also, the relevance of stochastic models for the decay of division synchrony in the absence of a recurrent synchronizing procedure is considered.