Summary
Evidence is presented which suggests that the mesophyll cell walls of cotton leaves may influence observed rates of transpiration.
The net diffusive flux of water vapour, from the upper and lower surfaces of a leaf, was compared with the flux of nitrous oxide through a leaf and evidence obtained of an extra resistance in the water-vapour pathway associated with water transport in the mesophyll cell walls.
This extra resistance appeared to be insignificant at low transpiration rates and in turgid leaves, but increased with transpiration rate and dehydration. The most likely explanation for its origin appeared to be a reduction in hydraulic conductivity across the internal cuticle which lines the outer surfaces of the mesophyll cell walls. In turn this served to reduce the relative vapour pressure at the sites of evaporation.
The experiments were conducted under conditions where stomatal opening was induced by CO2-free air. Under normal conditions stomatal closure would tend to reduce the development of this extra resistance. Even so, the results throw doubt on the validity of the long-standing assumption that the water-vapour pressure at the evaporation sites is equal to the saturation vapour pressure under all conditions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, P. L., Dittmer, D. S. (eds.): Environmental biology. Bethesda, Md.: Fed. Amer. Soc. Exp. Biol. 1966.
Boon-Long, T. S.: Transpiration as influenced by osmotic concentration and cell permeability. Amer. J. Bot. 28, 333–343 (1951).
Fischer, R. A.: Resistance to water loss in the mesophyll of leek (Allium porrum). J. exp. Bot. 19, 135–145 (1968).
Gale, J., Poljakoff-Mayber, A., Kahane, I.: The gas diffusion porometer technique and its application to the measurement of leaf mesophyll resistance. Israel J. Bot. 16, 187–204 (1967).
Goodspeed, M. J., Savage, J. V.: An analogue to digital converter for chart records. J. Sci. Instruments (J. Physics, E) 2, 451–455 (1968).
Holmgren, P., Jarvis, P. G., Jarvis, M. S.: Resistance to carbon dioxide and water vapour transfer in leaves of different plant species. Physiol. Plantarum (Cph.) 18, 557–573 (1965).
Jarvis, P. G., Jarvis, M. S.: Effect of several osmotic substrates on the growth of Lupinus albus seedlings. Physiol. Plant. 16, 485–500 (1963).
Jarvis, P. G., Jarvis, M. S., Slatyer, R. O.: A controlled environment chamber for studies of gas exchange by each surface of a leaf. CSIRO Div. Land Res. Tech. Pap. No 29 (1966a).
——: Calibration of beta gauges for determining leaf water status. Science 153, 78–79 (1966b).
——, Rose, C. W., Begg, J. E.: An experimental and theoretical comparison of viscous and diffusive resistances to gas flow through amphi-stomatous leaves. Agric. Meteorol. 4, 103–117 (1966).
Kennedy, J. S., Booth, C. O.: Water relations of leaves from woody and herbaceous plants. Nature (Lond.) 181, 1271–1272 (1958).
Klemm, G.: Untersuchungen über den Transpirationswiderstand der Mesophyll-membranen und seine Bedeutung als Regulator für die stomatäre Transpiration. Planta (Berl.) 47, 547–587 (1956).
Knight, R. C.: The interrelations of stomatal aperture, leaf water content, and transpiration rate. Ann. Bot. 31, 221–240 (1917).
Lewis, F. J.: Physical conditions of the surface of the mesophyll cell walls of the leaf. Nature (Lond.) 156, 407–408 (1945).
Livingston, B. E., Brown, W. H.: Relation of the daily march of transpiration to variations in the water content of foliage leaves. Bot. Gaz. 53, 309–330 (1912).
Milthorpe, F. L., Spencer, E. J.: Experimental studies of the factors controlling transpiration. J. exp. Bot. 8, 413–437 (1957).
Rawlins, S. L.: Resistance to water flow in the transpiration stream. In: Stomata and water relations in plants (I. Zelitch, ed.), p. 69–85. New Haven, Conn.: Agric. Exp. Stat. 1963.
Reynolds, E. S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol. 17, 208–212 (1963).
Scott, F. M.: Internal suberization of tissues. Bot. Gaz. 111, 378–394 (1950).
—: Cell wall surface of the higher plants. Nature (Lond.) 210, 1015–1021 (1966).
Shimshi, D.: The effect of soil moisture and phenylmercuric acetate upon stomatal aperture, transpiration and photosynthesis. Plant. Physiol. 38, 713–721 (1963).
Slatyer, R. O.: The measurement of diffusion pressure deficit in plants by a method of vapour equilibration. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 11, 349–365 (1958).
—: Some physical aspects of internal control of leaf transpiration. Agric. Meteorol. 3, 281–292 (1966).
—: Plant water relationships. New York: Acad. Press 1967.
—, Bierhuizen, J. F.: Transpiration from cotton leaves under a range of environmental conditions in relation to internal and external diffusive resistances. Aust. J. biol. Sci. 17, 115–130 (1964).
—, Jarvis, P. G.: A gaseous diffusion porometer for continuous measurement of diffusive resistance of leaves. Science 151, 574–576 (1966).
Slavik, B.: The influence of water deficit on transpiration. Physiol. Plantarium (Cph.) 11, 524–536 (1958).
Weatherley, P. E.: Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurements of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol. 49, 81–87 (1950).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarvis, P.G., Slatyer, R.O. The role of the mesophyll cell wall in leaf transpiration. Planta 90, 303–322 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386383
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00386383