Summary
Mature growth-phase internodes of Alaska paper birch (Betula resinifera) are preferred by the snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) over juvenile growth-phase internodes due to the low food value of the latter. While the mature over juvenile preferencec cannot be explained by the levels of inorganic nutrients or gross chemical fractions (resins or phenols), it can be explained by the striking differences in secondary metabolites of the two growth phases. The principle compound which renders the juvenile phase internodes unpalatable is papyriferic acid, a triterpene which is a demonstrated feeding deterrent to snowshoe hares and which is present in juvenile internodes at concentrations 25 times greater than those in mature internodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barikmo J (1976) Harens utnyttjelse av bjørk som vinterføde. Hovedoppqave ved Institute for Naturforvatning. NHL Dissertation
Bookhout TA (1965) The snowshoe hare in Upper Michigan: its biology and feeding coactions with white-tailed derr. Michigan Dept Conserv Res Develop Rep No 38
Bryant JP (1981 a) The regulation of snowshoe hare feeding behavior during winter by plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: Myers K, McIness CD (eds) Proc World Lagomorph Conf, 1979. Guelph Univ Press, Canada, pp 720–731
Bryant JP (1981 b) Phytochemical deterrence of snowshoe hare browsing by adventitious shoots of four Alaskan trees. Science 213:889–890
Bryant JP, Chapin III FS, Klein DR (1983 a) Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to herbivory. Oikos 40:357–368
Bryant JP, Wieland GD, Reichardt PB, Lewis VE, McCarthy MC (1983 b) Pinosylvin methyl ether deters snowshoe hare feeding on green alder. Science 222:1023–1025
Burns RE (1971) Method for estimation of tannin in grain sorghum. Agron J 63:511–512
Danell K, Bergstrom R, Dirke K (1984) Moose browsing on juvenile and adult birches (Betula pendula and Betula pubescens): Test of a hypothesis on chemical defense. Proc Int Union Game Biol (submitted)
Dimock EJ II (1974) Animal resistant Douglas-Fir: How likely and how soon? In: Black HC (ed) Wildlife and Forest Management in the Pacific Northwest. For Res Lab, School of Forestry-Oregon State Univ, Corvallis, pp 95–101
Dugle JP (1966) A taxonomic study of western Canadian species in the genus Betula. Can J Bot 44:929–1007
Fernald ML (1950) Gray's manual of botany. American Book Company, New York
Freeland WJ, Janzen DH (1974) Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am Nat 108:269–289
Geist V (1963) On the behavior of the North American moose (Alces alces Andersoni, Peterson 1950) in British Columbia. Behavior 20:377–416
Janzen DH (1973) Community structure of secondary compounds in plants. Pure Appl Chem 34:529–538
Janzen DH, Martin PS (1982) Neotropical Anachronisms: the fruits the Gomphotheres ate. Science 215:19–27
Kleiber M (1961) The fire of life: an introduction to animal energetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York
Klein DR (1977) Winter Food Preferences of Snowshoe Hares (Lepus americanus) in Interior Alaska. Proc Int Cong Game Biol 13:266–275
Libby WJ, Hood JV (1976) Juvenility in hedged radiata pine. Acta Hortic 56:91–98
Martin JS, Martin MM (1982) Tannin assays in ecological studies. Lack of correlation between phenolics, proanthocyanidins and protein-precipitating constituents in mature foliage of six oak speices. Oecologia (Berlin) 54:205–211
McKey D (1974) Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. Am Nat 108:305–320
McKey D (1979) The distribution of secondary compounds within plants. In: Rosenthal GA, Jansen DH (eds) Herbivores: Their interaction with secondary plant metabolites. Academic Press, New York, pp 55–133
Moss R, Miller GR, Allen SE (1972) Selection of heather by captive red grouse in relation to the age of the plant. J Appl Ecol 9:771–781
Mould ED, Robbins CT (1981) Evaluation of detergent analysis in estimating nutritional value of browse. J Wildl Manage 45:937–947
Palo RT (1984) Distribution of birch (Betula spp.), willow (Salix spp.) and poplar (Populus spp.) secondary metabolites and their potential role as chemical defense against herbivores. J Chem Ecol 10:499–520
Palo RT, Knutsson PG, Kiessling KH (1983 a) Seasonal variations in ruminant in vitro digestibility of Betula pendula in relation to nutritional content and phenolic constituents. Abstract of the Third European Ecological Symposium on Animal-Plant Interactions. Aug 22–26, 1983 Lund, Sweden
Palo RT, Pehrson A, Knutssson PG (1983 b) Can brich phenolics be of importance in the defense against browsing vertebrates? Finn Game Res (in press)
Pease JL, Vowles RH, Keith LB (1979) Interaction of snowshoe hares and woody vegetation. J Wildl Manage 43:43–60
Pehrson A (1981) Winter food consumption and digestibility in caged mountain hares. In: Meyers K, McIness CD (eds) Proc World Lagomorph Conf 1979. Guelph Univ Press, Canada, pp 732–742
Pehrson A (1983) Dry matter assimilation and nutrient retention in caged mountain hares. Holarctic Ecol 6:395–403
Price ML, van Scoyoc S, Butler LG (1978) A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J Agric Food Chem 26:1214–1218
Reichardt PB (1981) Papyriferic acid: a triterpenoid from Alaskan paper birch. J Org Chem 46:4576–4578
Ryala P (1966) Riekon jakiirunan talvisesta kasviravinnon valinnasta ja puissa ruokalilusta. Suomen Riista 19:79–93
Savory CJ (1978) Food consumption of red grouse in relation to the age and productivity of heather. J Anim Ecol 47:269–282
Schaffalitzky de Muckadell M (1962) Environmental factors in development stages of trees. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Tree Growth. Ronald Press, New York, p 289–298
Schultz JC, Baldwin IT, Nothnagle PJ (1981) Hemoglobin as a binding substrate in quantitative analysis of plant tannins. J Agric Food Chem 29:823–826
Schwartz CC, Franzmann AW, Johnson DC (1981) Moose Research Center Report. Alaska Dept of Fish and Game. Vol XII. Project progress report: federal aid in wildlife restoration project. W-21-2, Job 1.28R: pp 16–17
Shaver G, Chapin III FS (1980) Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61:662–675
Sinclair ARE, Krebs CJ, Smith JNM (1982) Diet quality and food limitation in herbivores: the case of the snowshoe hare. Can J Zool 60:889–897
Sinclair ARE, Smith JNM (1984) Do plant secondary compounds determine feeding preferences of snowshoe hares? Oecologia (Berl) 61:403–410
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Co, San Francisco
Sulkinoja M (1983) Lapin koivu. Oulun Yliopisto Pohjois-Suomen Tutkimuslaitos C47:40–46
Tahvanainen J, Helle E, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Lavola A (1984) Northern willows (Salix sp.) defend their juvenile shoots against the browsing mammals? Science (submitted)
Van Soest P (1982) Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Durham and Downey, Inc, New York
Viereck LA, Little EL (1972) Agriculture Handbook No 410. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC
Wolff JO (1980) The role of habitat patchiness in the population dynamics of snowshoe hares. Ecol Monogr 50:111–129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reichardt, P.B., Bryant, J.P., Clausen, T.P. et al. Defense of winter-dormant Alaska paper birch against snowshoe hares. Oecologia 65, 58–69 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384463
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384463