Abstract
We examined the public interest reports of General Motors from 1971 to 1990 and presented the contents thereof herein. The principal areas disclosed by GM during those years that are discussed in this paper were minorities, women, and employment issues, energy and the environment, international operations, automotive safety, and philanthropic activity. The purpose of this study was to examine the public interest report as a vehicle through which a firm might disclose information in the public interest. We concluded that there were at least three principal forces driving GM's disclosures. They included public attention focused on, potential costs associated with, and the relative subjectivity of an issue.
In reading their public interest reports, it became clear that GM is socially responsive in matters of public interest. Whether they are socially responsible is a judgment not within the scope of this study. However, we do not preclude the possibility that the report may serve as a vehicle which would build a certain momentum in public responsibility, and thus partially drive decisions made by management in social issues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karatnycky, A.: 1994, ‘In Global Vacuum, Tyranny Advances’, The Wall Street Journal 129(118), A18.
Meadows, D. et al.: 1972, The Limits to Growth (Universe Books, New York).
Merino, B. and M. Neimark: 1982, ‘Disclosure Regulation and Public Policy: A Sociohistorical Reappraisal’, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 1, 35–58.
Neimark, M.: 1992, The Hidden Dimensions of Annual Reports: Sixty Years of Social Conflict at General Motors (Markus Wiener Publishing, Inc., New York).
Paul, Karen: 1989, ‘Corporate Social Monitoring in South Africa: A Decade of Achievement, An Uncertain Future’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 463–469.
Paul, K. and D. Aquila: 1988, ‘Political Consequences of Ethical Investing: The Case of South Africa’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 691–697.
The Boston Women's Health Book Collective: 1984, The New Our Bodies, Ourselves: A Book By and For Women (Simon & Schuster, Inc., New York).
Tinker, T. and M. Neimark: 1987, ‘The Role of Annual Reports in Gender and Class Contradictions at General Motors: 1917–1976’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 12, 71–88.
Wood, D.: 1991, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16(4), 691–718.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
David Malone is an Associate Professor of Accounting at the University of Idaho. Dr. Malone's research interests are primarily in corporate social responsibility and public interest accounting. His research has been accepted for publication in journals which include Business & Professional Ethics Journal, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, Kent/Bently Journal of Accounting and Computers, Journal of Computer Information Systems, Oil and Gas Tax Quarterly, Petroleum Accounting and Financial Management Journal, and Journal of Education for Business.
Robin W. Roberts is the union Pacific/Charles B. Handy Professor of Accounting at Iowa State University. Dr. Roberts' research include public sector and public interest accounting and auditing. His research has been accepted for publication in such journals as Accounting, Organizations, & Society, Advances in Accounting, Business & Professional Ethics Journal, Journal of Accounting Research, and Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malone, D., Roberts, R.W. Public interest reports as a medium for corporate disclosure: The case of General Motors. J Bus Ethics 15, 759–771 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381740
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381740