Summary
Monitoring by means of blood and urine analysis for methanol was successfully applied in 32 male workers who were exposed to methyl methacrylate (MMA) monomer at 6 ppm as a geometric mean and at 112 ppm as the maximum. Measurement of time-weighted average (TWA) intensity of the vapor exposure was successfully conducted with a diffusive sampler with activated carbon cloth as an adsorbent. Methanol concentrations in whole blood, serum, and urine samples were measured by headspace gas chromtography. The methanol concentrations in the three biological samples collected at the end of 8-h workshifts related linearly with the TWA MMA vapor concentrations, with correlation coefficients of 0.8–0.9. Quantitative evaluation of MMA in vapor and of methanol in urine suggests that only 1.5% of MMA inhaled will be excreted in urine as methanol. There were no significant clinical symptoms or abnormal hematological or serum biochemical findings at this exposure level, except that some workers complained throat irritation and frequent cough and sputa. The results indicate that biological monitoring by analysis for methanol is sensitive enough to detect MMA exposure at levels at which no serious health effects are to be expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1992) 1992–1993 threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. ACGIH, Cincinnati
Baker S, Brooks SC, Walker DM (1988) The release of residual monometric methyl methacrylate from acrylic appliances in the human mouth: An assay for monomer in saliva. J Dent Res 67:1295–1299
Bigatti MP, Lamberti L, Canvas M, Rossi E (1989) Lack of sister-chromatid exchange induction by polymethyl methacrylate bone cement in human lymphocytes cultured in vitro. Mutat Res 227:21–24
Cai S-X, Huang M-Y, Chen Z, Liu Y-T, Jin C, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Seiji K, Inoue O, Ikeda M (1991) Subjective symptom increase among dry-cleaning workers exposed to tetrachloroethylene vapor. Ind Health 29:111–121
Cockerill D (1987) Allergies to ear moulds. Br J Audiol 21:143–145
Collins JJ, Page LC, Caporossi C, Utidjian HM, Saipher JN (1989) Mortality patterns among men exposed to methyl methacrylate. J Occup Med 31:41–46
Darre E, Vedel P, Jensen JS (1987) Skin protection against methylmethacrylate. Acta Orthop Scand 58:236–238
Darre E, Jogensen LG, Vedel P, Jensen JS (1992) Breathing zone concentrations of methylmethacrylate monomer during joint replacement operations. Pharmacol Toxicol 71:198–200
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (1992) MAK- and BAT-values 1992. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim
Donaghy M, Rushworth G, Jacobs JM (1991) Generalized peripheral neuropathy in a dental technician exposed to methyl methacrylate monomer. Neurology 41:1112–1116
Fisheer AA (1989) Permanent loss of fingernails due to allergic reaction to an acrylic nail preparation: a sixteen-year follow-up study. Cutis 43:404–406
Harper M (1992) A novel sampling method for methyl methacrylate in workplace air. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 53:773–775
Hirayama T, Ikeda M (1979) Applicability of carbon felt to the dosimetry of solvent vapor mixture. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 40:1091–1096
Inoue O, Seiji K, Kasahara M, Nakatsuka H, Watanabe T, Yin SN, Li G-L, Jin C, Cai S-X, Ikeda M (1986) Quantitative relation of urinary phenol levels to breath zone benzene concentrations; a factory survey. Br J Ind Med 43:692–697
Inoue T (1968) A table of subjective symptom questionnaires for solvent workers. In: Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association (eds) Health management of solvent workers. Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association, Tokyo, pp 66–67
Jackson S (1965) Creatinine in urine as an index of urinary excretion rate. Health Phys 12:843–850
Kanzaki T, Karasawa Y, Jinno T, Isayama K (1989) Contact stomatitis due to methyl methacrylate monomer. Contact Dermatitis 20:146–148
Kassis V, Vedel P, Darre E (1984) Contact dermatitis to methyl methacrylate. Contact Dermatitis 11:26–28
Kawai T, Yasugi K, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Hirase Y, Uchida Y, Ikeda M (1991) Methanol in urine as a biological indicator of occupational exposure to methanol per se. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 63:311–318
Kawai T, Yasugi K, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Iguchi H, Uchida Y, Iwami O, Ikeda M (1992) Comparative evaluation of urinalysis and blood analysis as means of detecting exposure to organic solvents at low concentrations. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:223–234
Koizumi A, Ikeda M (1981) A servomechanism for vapor concentration control in experimental exposure chambers. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J 42:417–425
Liu Y-T, Jin C, Chen Z, Cai S-X, Yin S-N, Li G-L, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Seiji K, Inoue O, Kawai T, Ukai H, Ikeda M (1988) Increased subjective symptom prevalence among workers exposed to trichloroethylene at sub-OEL levels. Tohoku J Exp Med 155:183–195
Ludwig K, Scheiffarth OF, Lund O-E (1987) Release and elimination of methylmethacrylate monomer after intraocular lens implantation. Graefe's Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 225:426–428
Marez T, Shirali P, Hildebrand HF, Haguenoer JM (1991) Increased frequency of sister chromatid exchange in workers exposed to high dose of methylmethacrylate. Mutagenesis 6:127–129
Mizunuma K, Kawai T, Yasugi T, Horiguchi S, Iwami O, Ikeda M (1992) In vitro hydrolysis of methyl acetate, a limitation in application of head-space gas-chromatography in biological monitoring of exposure. Toxicol Lett 62:247–253
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (1980) Methyl methacrylate. NIOSH manual of analytical methods, vol 6. USDHHS, Washington DC, pp S43-1–S43-10
Pople IK, Phillips H (1988) Bone cement and the liver. A dose-related effect? J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 70:364–366
Rainsford SG, Lloyd Davies TA (1965) Urinary excretion of phenol by men exposed to benzene: a screening test. Br J Ind Med 22:21–26
Rajaniemi R, Tola S (1985) Subjective symptoms among dental technicians exposed to the monomer methyl methacrylate. Scand J Work Environ Health 11:281–286
Sandmeyer EE, Kirwin CJ Jr (1981) Methyl methacrylate. In: Clayton GD, Clayton FE (eds) Patty's industrial hygiene and toxicology. Wiley-Interscience, New York, pp 2298–2299
Sax NI (1975) Dangerous properties of industrial materials, 4th edn. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p 927
Spealman CR, Main RJ, Haag HB, Larson PS (1945) Monomeric methyl methacrylate. Studies on toxicity. Ind Med 14:292–298
Thomas JP, Finch R (1991) Esophageal erosion. A complication of acrylic fixation in anterior cervical fusion. Spine 16:1238–1240
Ukai H, Watanabe T, Nakatsuka H, Satoh H, Liu S-J, Qiao X, Yin H, Jin C, Li G-L, Ikeda M (1993) Dose-dependent increase in subjective symptoms among toluene-exposed workers. Environ Res 60:274–289
Uchida Y, Liu Y-T, Huang M-Y, Nakatsuka H, Ukai H, Watanabe T, Wang Y-L, Zhu F-Z, Yin H, Ikeda M (1993) Symptoms and signs of workers exposed predominantly to xylenes. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:597–605
Yasugi T, Kawai T, Mizunuma K, Ikeda M (1992a) Diffusive personal sampler for methyl acetate monitoring. Bull Environ Contain Toxicol 49:325–333
Yasugi T, Kawai T, Mizunuma K, Horiguchi S, Iwami O, Iguchi H, Ikeda M (1992b) Formic acid excretion in comparison with methanol excretion in urine of workers occupationally exposed to methanol. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 64:329–337
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mizunuma, K., Kawai, T., Yasugi, T. et al. Biological monitoring and possible health effects in workers occupationally exposed to methyl methacrylate. Int. Arch Occup Environ Heath 65, 227–232 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381195
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381195