Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of polydactyly of the hands and fee

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The authors present a new classification of polydactyly based on radiomorphological alterations. The malformations are defined in two directions, as in a system of coordinates. The longitudinal arrangement is based on the pathogenetic principle of bifurcation of a finger or a toe ray from distal to proximal. We accordingly divided polydactylies into five types: distal phalanx, middle phalanx, proximal phalanx, metacarpal or metatarsal, carpal or tarsal. The transverse arrangement indicates which rays are involved. All polydactylies, including the special forms such as rudimentary manifestations, triphalangism, and multiple duplications, can be incorporated into this simple basic scheme. Depending on their characteristics, the special forms are further subdivided, e.g., into a distal or proximal phalanx type with simple or double triphalangism, or a tarsal type with third-degree duplication and first-degree aplasia. Numerous radiological examples and schematic drawings illustrate the classification. The advantage of the classification is that it depends exclusively upon the skeletal finding and all manifestations are registered according to a simple scheme longitudinally and transversely. This makes them codifiable for the computer and suitable for multicenter studies. The special forms, the rudiment, triphalangism, and multiple duplication, can easily be further subclassified. Moreover, the nomenclature is simple and is oriented to anatomical terminology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ammon FA von (1842) Die angeborenen chirurgischen Krankheiten des Menschen. Herbig, Berlin, pp 96–101

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ballowitz E (1905) Über die Hyperdaktylie des Menschen. Klin Jahrb 13:143–250

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bardeleben K (1890) Über die Hand- und Fußmuskeln der Säugetiere, besonders die des Präpollex (Prähallux) und Postminimus. Anat Anz 5:435–444

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blauth W (1981) Fehlbildungen der Hand. Handchirurgie 13:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blauth W, Olason AT (1984) Polydactyly of the feet. Acta Orthop Scand 55:687

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christiansen JC, Leff F, Lepow G, Schwartz R, Colon P, Arminio S, Nixon P, Segel D, Leff S (1981) Congenital polydactyly and polymetatarsalia: classification, genetics and surgical correction. J Foot Surg 20:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Egawa T, Dor T, Yoshioka Y, Hiroshima K (1969) Polydactyly of the foot. Jap J Plast Reconstr Surg 12:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  8. Förster A (1861) Die Mißbildungen des Menschen, mit Atlas. Mauke, Jena, pp 43–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire I (1837) Histoire générale et particulière des anomalies de l'organisation chez l'homme et les animaux, Bd II. Hauman, Bruxelles, pp 684–865

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gräfenberg E (1920) Die entwicklungsgeschichtliche Bedeutung der Hyperdaktylie menschlicher Gliedmaßen. Stud Path Entwickl 2:565–619

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grebe H (1964) Mißbildungen der Gliedmaßen. In: Becker P (Hrsg) Humangenetik, Bd II. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp 182–200

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kanavel AB (1932) Congenital malformations of the hands. Arch Surg 25:1–53 and 282–320

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kerckring Th (1670) “Spicilegium anatomicum continens observationum anatomicarum rariorum centuriam unam necnon osteogeniam foetuum etc.” Amsterdam, 1670. Cited by:

  14. Pol R (1958) Mißbildungen der Extremitäten. In: Schwalbe E, Gruber G (Hrsg) Die Morphologie der Mißbildungen des Menschen und der Tiere. Teil III: Die Einzelmißbildungen. Fischer, Jena, pp 683–719

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klaußner F (1900) Über Mißbildungen der menschlichen Gliedmaßen und ihre Entstehungsweise. Bergmann, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leeson MC, Wilcox PG, Weiner DS (1985) Congenital duplication of the foot and toes. Foot Ankle 5:191–197

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meckel J (1816) Handbuch der pathologischen Anatomic, Bd II. Heinrich, Leipzig, pp 35–39

    Google Scholar 

  18. Milles BL (1928) The inheritance of human skeletal anomalies. J Hered 19:28

    Google Scholar 

  19. Millesi H (1967) Deformation of the fingers following operation for polydactylia. Klin Med (Wien) 22:266–272

    Google Scholar 

  20. Miura T (1980) Polydactyly in Japan. Handchirurgie 12:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  21. Müller W (1937) Die angeborenen Fehlbildungen der menschlichen Hand. Thieme, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nathan P, Keniston R (1975) Crossed polydactyly. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 57:847–848

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nitsche F (1932) Über lokalisierte Doppelmißbildungen und ihre Genese. Z Orthop Chir 55:601–617

    Google Scholar 

  24. O'Rahilly R (1951) Morphological patterns in limb deficiencies and duplication. Am J Anat 89:135–193

    Google Scholar 

  25. Olason AT (1986) Zur Klassifikation und Morphologie von Polydaktylien der Füße. Medizinische Inaugural-Dissertation, Kiel

  26. Pol R (1914) Die Vertebraten-Hypermelie. Stud Path Entwickl 1:71–184

    Google Scholar 

  27. Przibram H (1921) Die Bruch-Dreifachbildung im Tierreiche. Arch Entwickl-Mech Org 48:205–444

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schenk R, Jacquemain B (1969) Hochgradige numerische Plusvariante an Hand und Fuß. Z Orthop 105:515–527

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ströer W (1936) Die Extremitätenmißbildungen und ihre Beziehungen zum Bauplan der Extremität. Z Anat Entwickl-Gesch 108:136–160

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sverdrup A (1922) Postaxial polydactylism in six generations of a Norwegian family. J Genet 12:217–240

    Google Scholar 

  31. Temtamy S, McKusick V (1969) Synopsis of hand malformations with particular emphasis on genetic factors. Birth Defects: Original Article Series 5:125–184

    Google Scholar 

  32. Temtamy S, McKusick V (1978) The genetics of hand malformations. Birth Defects: Original Article Series 14:364–440

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tuch BA, Lipp EB, Larsen IJ, Gordon LH (1977) A review of supernumerary thumb and its surgical management. Clin Orthop 125:159–167

    Google Scholar 

  34. Venn-Watson E (1976) Problems in polydactyly of the foot. Orthop Clin North Am 7:909–927

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wassel HD (1969) The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. Clin Orthop 64:175–193

    Google Scholar 

  36. Weil S (1923) Diplocheirie und Diplopodie. Z Orthop 43:565–607

    Google Scholar 

  37. Werthemann A (1952) Die Entwicklungsstörungen der Extremitäten. In: Lubarsch O, Henke F, Rössle R (eds) Handbuch der speziellen pathologischen Anatomie and Histologie, Bd IX, Teil 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 24–56

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wood VE (1978) Polydactyly and the triphalangeal thumb. J Hand Surg 3:436–444

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Buck-Gramcko on the occasion of his 60th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blauth, W., Olason, A.T. Classification of polydactyly of the hands and fee. Arch. Orth. Traum. Surg. 107, 334–344 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381058

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381058

Keywords

Navigation