Skip to main content
Log in

Cannibalism as the cause of an ontogenetic shift in habitat use by fry of the threespine stickleback

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In Crystal Lake, British Columbia, small fry (≤15 mm SL) of the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) are concentrated in vegetation while larger fry are not. Because fry in all size classes feed primarily on zooplankton, even when in vegetation, we hypothesized that size-limited predation was responsible for the observed shift in habitat use with size. The major predators on fry in Crystal Lake are adult threespine stickleback, the water scorpion, Ranatra sp. (Hemiptera: Nepidae), backswimmers, Notonecta spp. (Hemiptera: Notonectidae), and dragonfly naiads of the genus Aeshna (Odonata: Aeschnidae). On the basis of distribution and hunting behavior we excluded the insects Ranatra sp., and Notonecta sp. as causal agents for this shift in resource by fry in water >0.25 m deep. Ranatra was found almost exclusively near the shoreline in water <0.25 m deep, and both insects hunted primarily as ambush predators within vegetation. Such predators seemed more likely to drive vulnerable fry from vegetation than to restrict them to it. In contrast, Aeshna naiads and adult stickleback frequently hunted outside of vegetation. In prey preference experiments the naiads did not show the decline in predation efficiency on fry >15 mm SL that would be expected if size-limited predation by this insect was responsible for the observed shift in resource use by fry. Adult stickleback only fed on fry <15 mm SL, and in an experimental situation, consumed fry at a rate 10 times greater than that exhibited by any of the insects. Predation experiments demonstrated that small fry (11–15 mm) spent more time in vegetation in the presence of adult conspecifics than they did in control pools, as would be expected if size-limited cannibalism caused small, vulnerable fry to be restricted to vegetation. Fry >15 mm SL were found outside of vegetation more often than in control treatments. The probable cause of this result is that adults become aggressive toward fry at this size, and often could be seen chasing large fry from vegetation during the experiments. Dragonfly naiads (Aeshna spp.) spent most of their time in vegetation in the experimental pools. Both size classes of fry spent less time in vegetation in the presence of dragonfly naiads than they did in control treatments, an apparent reflection of their similar vulnerabilities to these naiads. The presence of vegetation in pools reduced predation rates by adult stickleback on small fry. Because the experiments presented here indicate that fry are capable of rapidly assessing predation risk and of altering their behavior adaptively, we conclude that small fry occupy vegetation as a refuge from cannibalism. Once fry have reached the size-threshold at which they are no longer vulnerable to adult conspecifics they are able to forage farther from vegetation thereby reducing risk of predation by insects in vegetation and possibly acquiring more abundant food resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown JA (1985) The adaptive significance of behavioural ontogeny in some centrarchid fishes, Env Biol Fish 13:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell JP, Thorp JH, Jervey TO (1980) Predator-prey relationships among larval dragonflies, salamanders, and frogs. Oecologia (Berlin) 46:285–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Calef GW (1973) Natural mortality of tadpoles in a population of Rana aurora. Ecology 54:741–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Martindale S, Pulliam HR (1980) Avian flocking in the presence of a predator. Nature 285:400–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1970) A predator-prey system in the marine intertidal region. I. Balanus glandula and several predatory species of Thais. Ecol Monogr 40:49–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Connel JH (1970) On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forests. In: Boer PJ den, Gradwell GR (eds) Proceedings of the Advance Study Institute on Dynamics of Numbers Populations (Oosterbeck 1970). Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen, pp 298–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities. In: Cody MI, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook WL, Streans FA (1984) Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecology (Berlin) 64:177–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowder LB, Cooper WE (1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63:1802–1813

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump ML (1984) Ontogenetic changes in vulnerability to predation in tadpoles of Hyla pseudopuma. Herpetologica 40:265–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebeling AW, Laur DR (1985) The influence of plant cover on surfperch abundance at an offshore temperate reef. Envir Biol Fish 12:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • FitzGerald GJ (1983) The reproductive ecology and behaviour of three sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteidae) in a salt marsh. Biol Behav 8:67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox LR (1975) Factors influencing cannibalism, a mechanism of population limitation in the predator Notonecta hoffmanni. Ecology 56:933–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser DF, Cerri RD (1982) Experimental evaluation of predatorprey relationships in a patchy environment consequences for habitat use patterns in minnows. Ecology 63:307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JJ (1967) Asplanchna and postero-lateral spine production in Brachionus calyciflorus. Arch Hydrobiol 64, 1–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JJ, Stemberger RS (1984) Asplanachna-induced polymorphism in the rotifer Keratella slacki. Limnol Oceanog 29:1309–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass NR (1971) Computer analysis of predation energetics in the largemouth bass. In: Patten BC (ed) Systems analysis and simulation in ecology. Academic Press, New York, pp 326–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall DJ, Werner EE (1977) Seasonal distribution and the abundance of fishes in the littoral zone of a Michigan lake. Trans Am Fish Soc 106:545–555

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausfater G, Hrdy SB (1984) Infanticide. Aldine, Hawthorn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Holbrook SJ, Schmitt RJ (1984) Experimental analyses of patch selection by foraging surfperch, (Embiotoca jacksoni Agazzi). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 79:39–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson PBN (1961) The impact of predation especially by the tiger fish (Hydrocynus vittatus Cast.) on African freshwater fishes. Proc Zool Soc London 136:603–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadel K (1975) Freilandstudien zur Uberlevenstrate von Kreuzdrotenlarven (Bufo calamita Laur.). Rev Suisse Zool 83:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Keast A, Harker J, Turnbull D (1978) Nearshore fish habitat utilization and species associations in Lake Opinicon (Ontario, Canada). Env Biol Fish 3:173–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Kynard BE (1978) Breeding behavior of a lacustrine population of threespine sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.). Behaviour 67:178–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin DR, Werner EE (1980) Resource partitioning in two coexisting sunfish: pumpkinseed (Lepomis gibbosus) and northern longear sunfish (Lepomis megalotis peltastes). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 37:1411–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubchenco J (1983) Littorina and Fucus: effect of herbivores, substratum heterogeneity, and plant escapes during succession. Ecology 64:1116–1123

    Google Scholar 

  • Milinski M, Heller R (1978) Influence of a predator on the optimal foraging behaviour of sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Nature 275:642–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittlebach GG (1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62:1370–1386

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittlebach GG (1984) Predation and resource partitioning in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 65:499–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie GEE (1972) Morphology, life history and ecology of an unusual stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) in the Queen Charlotte Islands, Canada. Can J Zool 50:721–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Natural history, limiting factors and energetics of the opisthobranch Navanax inermis. Ecology 46:603–619

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1976) Size-limited predation: an observational and experimental approach with the Mytilus-Pisaster interaction. Ecology 57:858–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterkin GF, Tubbs CR (1965) Woodland regeneration in the New Forest, Hamsphire, since 1650. J Appl Ecol 2:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1981) The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:225–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1984) Intraspecific predation and “infant killing” among invertebrates. In: Hausfater G, Hrdy SB (eds) Infanticide. Aldine, Hawthorn, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popova O (1967) The ‘predator prey’ relationship among fishes. In: S. Gerking (ed) The biological basis of, freshwater fish production. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 359–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Power ME, Matthews WJ, Stewart AJ (1985) Grazing minnows, piscivorous bass and stream algae: dynamics of a strong interaction. Ecology 66:1448–1456

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimchen TE (1980) Spine deficiency and polymorpism in a population of Gasterosteus aculeatus: an adaptation to predators? Can J Zool 58:1232–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Savino JF, Stein RA (1982) Predator-prey interaction between largemouth bass and bluegills as influenced by simulated, submersed vegetation. Trans Am Fish Soc 111:255–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlosser IJ (1987) The role of predation in age- and size-related habitat use by stream fishes. Ecology 68:651–659

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt RJ, Holbrook SJ (1985) Patch selection by juvenile black surfperch (Embiotocidae) under variable risk: interactive influence of food quality and structural complexity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 85:269–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JC (1981) Adaptive changes in antipredator behavior of a grasshopper during development. Evolution 35:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Semler DE (1971) Some aspects of adaptation in a polymorphism for breeding colours in the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) J Zool Soc Lond 165:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1982) Foraging strategies and the avoidance of predation by an aquatic insect Notonecta hoffmani. Ecology 63:786–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RA (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish Ecology 58:1237–1253

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RA, Magnuson JJ (1976) Behavioral response of crayfish to a fish predator. Ecology 58:571–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis J, Keen WH, Juilianna J (1985) The role of relative body size in a predator-prey relationship between dragonfly naiads and larval anurans. Oikos 45:59–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1979) Niche partitioning by food size in fish communities. In: Stroud, RH, Clepper H (eds) Predator-prey systems in fisheries management. Sport Fishing Institute, Washington DC, pp 311–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE (1984) The mechanisms of species interactions and community organization in fish. In: Strong DR, Simberloff D, Abele LG, Thistle AB (eds) Ecological communities: conceptual issues and the evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 360–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Hall DJ (1979) Foraging efficiency and habitat switching in competing sunfishes. Ecology 60:256–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF (1984) The ontogenetic niche and speices interactions in size-structured populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:393–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Werne EE, Hall DJ, Laughlin DR, Wagner DJ, Wilsmann LA, Funk FC (1977) Habitat partitioning in a freshwater fish community. J Fish Res Board Can 34:360–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Gilliam JF, Hall DJ, Mittlebach GG (1983) An experimental test of the effects of predation risk on habitat use in fish. Ecology 64:1540–1548

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Mittlebach GG, Hall DJ, Gilliam JF (1983) Experimental tests of optimal habitat use in fish: the role of relative habitat profitability. Ecology 64:1525–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorisky FG, FitzGerald GJ (1985) Sex, cannibalism and sticklebacks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 18:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton FJ (1971) A note on the nest-raiding behaviour of male sticklebacks. Can J Zool 49:960–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Wootton FJ (1976) The biology of sticklebacks. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaret TM (1980) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press. New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Foster, S.A., Garcia, V.B. & Town, M.Y. Cannibalism as the cause of an ontogenetic shift in habitat use by fry of the threespine stickleback. Oecologia 74, 577–585 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380056

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380056

Key words

Navigation