Skip to main content
Log in

Biotic soil factors affecting the growth and development of Ammophila arenaria

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

To study the origin of replant disease of Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link the growth and development in sand originating from the rhizosphere of a natural Ammophila vegetation was compared with the growth in sand from the sea-floor. In a greenhouse experiment, the growth of Ammophila seedlings in rhizosphere sand, when compared with that in sea sand, was significantly reduced. As sterilization by means of gamma-irradiation increased the biomass production of Ammophila seedlings significantly, it was concluded that the rhizosphere sand contained biotic factors that were harmful to Ammophila. In rhizosphere sand the roots of Ammophila were brown and poorly developed, and the specific uptake rates of N, P and K were reduced. The shoot weight proportion of the total plant dry matter was hardly influenced. In an outdoor experiment with Ammophila seedlings and cuttings, using both sands, the mortality was high and the plants were feeble in rhizosphere sand whereas plants in sea sand grew vigorously. It seems plausible that the plants in rhizophere sand were dessicated because the root system was shallow and badly developed. In the greenhouse experiments, Ammophila cuttings were less sensitive to the inhibiting factors in the rhizosphere than seedlings. This was confirmed in the outdoor experiment. Calammophila baltica (Fluegge ex Schrader) Brand, however, was hardly affected by the harmful biotic factors in the greenhouse. These results are discussed with reference to the ecology of Ammophila. It is assumed that the catching of fresh windblown sand provides Ammophila with a way to escape from harmful biotic soil factors, and it was concluded that degeneration of Ammophila is caused mainly by self-intolerance due to these biotic soil factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel Wahab AM (1975) Nitrogen fixation by Bacillus strains isolated from the rhizosphere of Ammophila arenaria. Pl Soil 42:703–708

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdel Wahab AM, Wareing PF (1980) Nitrogenase activity associated with the rhizosphere of Ammophila arenaria and effect of inoculation of seedlings with Azotobacter. New Phytol 84:711–722

    Google Scholar 

  • Adriani MJ, Terwindt JHJ (1974) Sand stabilization and dune building. Rijkswaterstaat communications no 19, Government Publishing Office. The Hague, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad MH, Neckelman J (1978) N2-fixation by roots and rhizosphere of sand dune plants. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenk 141:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr DA, McKenzie JB (1976) Dune stabilization in Queensland, Australia, using vegetation and muches. Int J Biometeorol 20:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown RL, Hafenrichter AL (1948b) Factors influencing the production and use of beachgrass and dunegrass clones for erosion control. II. Influence of density of planting. J Am Soc Agr 40:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nooij MP, Troelstra SR, Wagenaar R (1986) Growth reduction in Plantago lanceolata in relation to biotic factors in the soil environment. Oecologia (Berlin) 70:266–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Disraeli DJ (1984) The effect of sand deposits on the growth and morphology of Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldred RA, Maun MA (1982) A multivariate approach of the problem of decline in vigour of Ammophila. Can J Bot 60:1371–1380

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst WHO, Van Duin WE, Oolbekking GT (1984) Vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae in dune vegetation. Acta Bot Neerl 33:151–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassouna MG, Wareing PF (1964) Possible role of rhizosphere bacteria in the nitrogen nutrition of Ammophila arenaria. Nature 202:467–469

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt EJ (1966) Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. CMI Bureau, Bucks, pp 547

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoestra H (1968) Replant diseases of apple in The Netherlands. PhD. thesis Agricultural University Wageningen, Netherlands

  • Hope-Simpson JF, Jefferies RL (1966) Observations relating to vigour and debility in marram grass (Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link). J Ecol 54:271–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL (1977) The natural establishment of Ammophila arenaria from seed. Oikos 29:133–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL (1979) Biological flora of the British Isles: Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link (Psamma arenaria (L.) Roem. et Schult.: Calamagrostis arenaria (L.) Roth). J Ecol 67:363–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL (1980) The effect of habitat perturbation of leaf populations of Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link. Acta Bot Neerl 29:443–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Huiskes AHL, Harper JL (1979) The demography of leaves and tillers of Ammophila arenaria in a dune sere. Ecol Plant 14:435–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel M (1970) Studies on the ecology of the nematods inhibiting Ammophila arenaria plant community on beaches and dunes of Baltic sea shore. Akademia Rolnicza 34:111–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing CC (1958) Studies in the ecology of Ammophila breviligulata I. Seedling survival and its relation to population increase and dispersal. Bot Gaz 119:208–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing CC (1967) The ecology of Ammophila breviligulata. II. Genetic change as a factor in population decline on stable dunes. Am Midl Nat 77:495–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Lux H (1969) Zur Biologie des Strandhafers (Ammophila arenaria) und seiner technischen Anwendung im Dünenbau. In: Tüxen R (ed) Experimentelle Pflanzensoziologie (1969) Den Haag, Netherlands, pp 138–145

  • Maas PWTh, Oremus PAI, Otten H (1983) Nematods (Longidorus sp. and Tylenchorhynchus microphasmis Loof) in growth and nodulation of sea buckthorn (Hippophaë rhamnoides L.) Pl Soil 73:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JK (1965) Corynephorus canescens (L.) P. Beauv. as a model for the Ammophila problem. J Ecol 53:447–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA (1984) Colinizing ability of Ammophila breviligulata through vegetative regeneration. J Ecol 72:565–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Maun MA, Lapierre J (1984) The effects of burial by sand on Ammophila breviligulata. J Ecol 72:827–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson TH (1960) Mycorrhizae in Graminae. II. Development in different habitats, particularly sand dunes. Trans Br mycol Soc 43:132–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson TH, Johnston C (1979) Mycorrhizae in the Gramineae. III. Glomus fasciculatus as the endophyte of pioneer grasses in a maritime sand dune. Trans Br mycol Soc 72:261–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Novozamsky I, Houba VJG, Temminghoff E, Van der Lee JJ (1984) Determination of ‘total’ N and ‘total’ P in a single soil digest. Neth J agric Sci 32:322–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson JS (1958) Rates of succession and soil changes of southern Lake Michigan sand dunes. Bot Gaz 119:125–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Oremus PAI (1982) Factors affecting growth and nodulation of Hippophaë rhamnoides (L.) ssp. Rhamnoides in the coastal sand dunes of the Netherland. PhD. thesis University of Utrecht, Netherlands

  • Oremus PAI, Otten H (1981) Factors affecting growth and nodulation of Hippophaë rhamnoides in soils from two successional stages of dune formation. Pl Soil 63:317–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlik BM (1983) Nutrient and productivity relations of the dune grasses Ammophila arenaria and Elymus mollis. I. Blade photosynthesis and nitrogen use efficiency in the laboratory and field. Oecologia (Berlin) 57:227–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Jenkinson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatments on metabolism in soil. II. Gamma irradiation, autoclaving, air-drying and fumigation. Soil Biol Biochem 8:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihan JR, Gray AJ (1985) Ecology of the hybrid Marram grass x Calammophila baltica in Britian. Vegetatio 61:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt GA (1979) The increasing interest in ‘minor pathogens’. In: Schippers B, Gams W (eds) Soil-borne plant pathogens. Academic, New York, pp 289–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Schippers B, Geels FP, Hoekstra O, Lamers JG, Maenhout CAAA, Scholte K (1985) Yield depressions in narrow rotations caused by unknown microbial factors and their suppression by selected Pseudomonads. In: Parker CA, Moore KJ, Wong PTW, Rovira AD, Kollmorgen JF (eds) Ecology and management of soil-borne plant pathogens. APS, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte K, Kupers LJP (1977) The causes of the lack of self-intolerance of winter rye, grown on light sandy soils. 1. Influences of foot rots and nematodes. Neth J agric Sci 25:225–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte K, Kupers LJP (1978) The cause of the lack of self tolerance of winter rye, grown on light sandy soils II. Influences of phytotoxins and soil microflora. Neth J agric Sci 26:250–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry. The principles of practice of statistics in biological research. ISBN 0-7167-1254-7

  • Van der Putten WH, Van Gulik WJM (1987) Stimulation of vegetation growth on raised coastal fore-dune ridges. Neth J agric Sci 35:198–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallén B (1980) Changes in structure and function of Ammophila during primary succesion. Oikos 34:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Westergaard M (1943) Gyto-taxonomical studies on Calamagrostis epigejos (L.) Roth, Ammophila arenaria (L.) Link and their hybrids (Ammophila baltica (Flügge) Link). Biologiske Skrifter 2:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams RF (1948) The effect of phosphorus supply on the rates of intake of phosphorus and nitrogen and upon certain aspects of phosphorus metabolism in gramineous plants. Aust J Sci Res 1:333–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis AJ (1963) Braunton Burrows: the effects on the vegetation of the addition of mineral nutrients to dune soils. J Ecol 51:353–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis AJ (1965) The influence of mineral nutrients on the growth of Ammophila arenaria. J Ecol 53:735–745

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Putten, W.H., van Dijk, C. & Troelstra, S.R. Biotic soil factors affecting the growth and development of Ammophila arenaria . Oecologia 76, 313–320 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379970

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379970

Key words

Navigation