Summary
The term “size hierarchy” has been used frequently by plant population biologists but it has not been defined. Positive skewness of the size distribution, which has been used to evaluate size hierarchies, is inappropriate. We suggest that size hierarchy is equivalent to size inequality. Methods developed by economists to evaluate inequalities in wealth and income, the Lorenz curve and Gini Coefficient, provide a useful quantification of inequality and allow us to compare populations. A measure of inequality such as the Gini Coefficient will usually be more appropriate than a measure of skewness for addressing questions concerning plant population structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson AB (1970) On the measurement of inequality. J Econ Theory 2:244–263
Bowman MJ (1946) Readings in the Theory of Income Distributions. Blackston, Philadelphia
Diaconis P, Efron B (1983) Computer intensive methods in statistics. Sci Am 248(5):116–130
Efron B (1982) The jackknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plants. SIAM Monograph No. 38
Ford ED (1975) Competition and stand structure in some evenaged plant monocultures. J Ecol 63:311–333
Gini C (1912) Variabilita e mutabilita. Bologna
Koyama H, Kira T (1956) Intraspecific competition among higher plants. VIII. Frequency distribution of individual plant weight as affected by the interaction between plants. J Inst Polytech Osaka Cy University 7:73–94
Leverich WJ, Levin DA (1979) Age-specific survivorship and reproduction in Phlox drummondi. Am Nat 113:881–903
Lorenz MO (1905) Methods for measuring the concentration of wealth. Am Stat Assoc 9:209–219
Obeid M, Machin D, Harper JL (1967) Influence of density on plant to plant variation in fiber flax Linum usitatissumum L. Crop Sci 7:471–473
Ogden J (1970) Plant population structure and productivity. Proc New Zeal Ecol Soc 17:1–9
Ricci U (1916) L'indice di variabilita e la curve dei reddita. Rome
Sen A (1973) On Economic Inequality. Clarendon, Oxford
Sohn JJ, Policansky D (1977) The costs of reproduction in the mayapple Podophyllum peltatum (Berberidaceae). Ecology 58:1366–1374
Sokal RR, Rohlf JE (1981) Biometry. Freeman, San Francisco
Solbrig OT (1981) Studies on the population biology of the genus Viola II. The effect of plant size on fitness in Viola sororia. Evolution 35:1080–1093
Turner MD, Rabinowitz DR (1983) Factors affecting frequency distributions of plant mass: the absence of dominance and suppression in Festuca paradoxa. Ecology 64:469–475
Weiner J (1984) Size hierarchies in experimental populations of annual plants. Submitted
Werner PA, Caswell H (1977) Population growth rates and age versus stage distribution models for teasel (Dipsacus sylvestris Huds.). Ecology 58:1103–1111
White J, Harper JL (1970) Correlated changes in plant size and number in plant populations. J Ecol 58:467–485
Yoda K, Kira T, Ogawa H, Hozumi KJ (1963) Self-thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. J Biol Osaka Cy Univ 14:107–129
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Weiner, J., Solbrig, O.T. The meaning and measurement of size hierarchies in plant populations. Oecologia 61, 334–336 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379630
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379630