Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal foraging: food patch depletion by ruddy ducks

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

I studied the foraging behavior of ruddy ducks (Oxyura jamaicensis) feeding on patchily distributed prey in a large (5-m long, 2-m wide, and up to 2-m deep) aquarium. The substrate consisted of a 4x4 array of wooden trays (1.0-m long, 0.5-m wide, and 0.1-m deep) which contained 6 cm of sand. Any tray could be removed from the aquarium and “loaded” with a known number of prey. One bird foraged in the aquarium at a time; thus, by removing a food tray after a trial ended and counting the remaining prey, I calculated the number of prey consumed by the bird. I designed several experiments to determine if ruddy ducks abandoned a food patch in a manner consistent with the predictions of a simple, deterministic, patch depletion model. This model is based on the premise that a predator should maximize its rate of net energy intake while foraging. To accomplish this, a predator should only remain in a food patch as long as its rate of energy intake from that patch exceeds the average rate of intake from the environment. In the majority of comparisons, the number of food items consumed by the ruddy ducks in these experiments was consistent with the predictions of the foraging model. When the birds did not forage as predicted by the model, they stayed in the patch longer and consumed more prey than predicted by the model. An examination of the relation between rate of net energy intake and time spent foraging in the food patch indicated that by staying in a patch longer than predicted, the ruddy ducks experienced only a small deviation from maximum rate of net energy intake. These results provided quantitative support for the prediction that ruddy ducks maximize their rate of net energy intake while foraging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Belovsky GE (1981) Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecol 62:1020–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky GE (1984) Summer diet optimization by beaver. Am Midl Nat 111:209–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody S (1945) Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: the marginal value theorem. Theor Pop Biol 9:129–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL, Orians GH, Hyatt K (1976) Ecological implications of resource depression. Am Nat 110:247–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie RJ (1977) Optimal foraging in great tits (Parus major). Nature 268:137–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B, Gong G (1983) A leisurely look at the boostrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat 37:36–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Emlen JM (1966) The role of time and energy in food preference. Am Nat 100:611–617

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RF (1980) Bayesian birds: a simple example of Oaten's stochastic model of optimal foraging. Theor Pop Biol 18:244–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Green RF (1984) Stopping rules for optimal foragers Am Nat 123:30–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Higashi M, Yanamura N (1981) Prey distribution as a factor determining the choice of optimal foraging strategy. Am Nat 117:710–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Janetos AC, Cole BJ (1981) Imperfectly optimal animals. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:203–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil AC (1983) Optimal foraging and the psychology of learning. Am Zool 23:291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging: decision rules for predators. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford, England, pp 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Cowie RJ (1976) Foraging strategies in birds. Ardea 64:98–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Ryan JC, Charnov EL (1974) Hunting by expectation or optimal foraging? A study of patch use by chickadees. Anim Behav 22:953–964

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Erichsen JT, Webber MI, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal prey selection in the great tit (Parus major). Anim Behav 25:30–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR, Stephans DW, Sutherland WJ (1983) Perspectives in optimal foraging. In: Brush AH, Clark GA (s) Perspectives in ornithology. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, pp 163–216

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Pianka ER (1966) On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am Nat 100:603–609

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1982) Optimal giving-up times and the marginal value theorem. Am Nat 119:511–529

    Google Scholar 

  • McNair JN (1983) A class of patch-use strategies. Am Zool 23:303–313

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara J (1982) Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment. Theor Pop Biol 21:269–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaten A (1977) Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor Pop Biol 12:263–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 15:523–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried WR (1973) Summer food and feeding of the ruddy duck in Manitoba. Can J Zool 51:1293–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1982) Optimal patch use: variation in selective pressure for efficient foraging. Am Nat 120:666–685

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JNM, Dawkins R (1971) The hunting behavior of individual great tits in relation to spatial variations in their food density. Anim Behav 19:695–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JNM, Sweatman HPA (1974) Food-searching behavior of titmice in patchy environments. Ecology 55:1216–1232

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephans DW, Charnov EL (1982) Optimal foraging: some simple stochastic models. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:251–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Tome MW (1981) Reproductive bioenergetics of female ruddy ducks in Manitoba. MS thesis University of Maine

  • Tome MW (1984) Changes in nutrient reserves and organ size of female ruddy ducks breeding in Manitoba. Auk 101:830–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Tome MW (1986) Foraging behavior of ruddy ducks: a test of optimal foraging theory. Ph D dissertation. University of Michigan

  • Ward, P, Batt, BDJ (1973) Propagation of captive waterfowl: the Delta Waterfowl Research Station system. Wildl Mgmt Inst, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Woakes AJ, Butler PJ (1983) Swimming and diving in tufted ducks, Aythya fuligula, with particular reference to heart rate and gas exchange. J Exp Biol 107:311–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley JB, Owen RB Jr (1978) Energy costs of activity and daily energy expenditure in the black duck. J Wildl Manage 42:739–745

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1974) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall Inc Englewood Cliffs NJ

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tome, M.W. Optimal foraging: food patch depletion by ruddy ducks. Oecologia 76, 27–36 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379596

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379596

Key words

Navigation