Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An anti-predator response in the great tit (Parus major): Is it tuned to predator risk?

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Two semi-quantitative predictions about the intensity of defence against a predator based on the associated costs and benefits as a function of predator species, were examined in great tits (Parus major) feeding nestlings. One premise was that defence behaviour is adaptive. Defence comprised of vocalizing and homing in on a live raptor near the nest hole. The intensity of defence as judged by two measures of approaching (Minimum Distance, Average Distance) varies with the species of raptor, i.e. sparrowhawk ♀ (Accipiter nisus), pigmy owl (Glaucidium perlatum), and tawny owl (Strix aluco). With the exception of the response to the pigmy owl, defence intensities proved to conform to both predictions; the tits correctly assessed the relative overall risk from each predator (“predator pressure”) i.e. its degree of specialization on great tits, and the immediate risk of defence. The failure to verify the predictions regarding the pigmy owl is thought to derive from our incomplete assessment of the cost function and/or from the response being mal-adaptive.

The male takes a greater risk, exceeding the female's by an amount independent of the species of raptor. The sexual difference remains functionally unexplained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ainley DG (1972) Flocking in Adélie Penguins. Ibis 114:188–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Berndt R, Winkel W (1967) Die Gelegegröße des Trauerschnäppers (Ficedula hypoleuca) in Beziehung zu Ort, Zeit, Biotop und Alter. Vogelwelt 88:97–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bildstein KL (1982) Responses of northern harriers to mobbing passerines. J Field Ornithol 53:7–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet G, Ovenden D (1982) Pareys Buch der Säugetiere. Parey, Berlin Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Coss RG (1978) Development of face aversion by the jewel fish (Hemichromis bimaculatus, Gill 1862). Z Tierpsychol 48:28–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1969) Funktionsweise und Stammesgeschichte des Flugfeinderkennens einiger Darwinfinken (Geospizinae). Z Tierpsychol 26:394–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1975) The functional organization of anti-predator behavior in the pied flycatcher: A study of avian visual perception. Anim Behav 23:1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1978) The adaptive significance of avian mobbing. I. Teleonomic hypotheses and predictions. Z Tierpsychol 48:175–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1980) An unknown determinant of a sex-specific atruism. Z Tierpsychol 53:139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Curio E (1983) Time-energy budgets and optimization. Experientia 39:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Denson RD (1979) Owl predation on a mobbing crow. Wilson Bull 91:133

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebersole JP (1977) The adaptive significance of interspecific territoriality in the reef fish Eupomacentrus leucostictus. Ecology 58:914–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1978) A predator's view of animal color patterns. In: Hecht MK, Steere WC, Wallace B (eds) Evolutionary Biology, vol 11. Plenum Publ Corp, pp 319–364

  • Farr JA (1975) The role of predation in the evolution of social behaviour of natural populations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Evolution 29:151–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway DM (1970) The Oxford expedition to the Falkland Islands 1969. Predator recognition in two species of Falkland Islands passerines. Bull Oxf Univ Explor Club 18:27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz v Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1971) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol 4. Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, Frankfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Glutz v Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM (1980) Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas, Vol 9. Akad Verlagsgesellschaft, Wicsbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC Jr (1977) Discrimination of aerial predators by American coots in nature. Anim Behav 25:1065–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennessy DF, Owings DH (1978) Snake species discrimination and the role of olfactory cues in the snake-directed behaviour of the California ground squirrel. Behaviour 65:115–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinde RA (1952) The behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some other related species. Behaviour Suppl 2:1–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch SM, Bolles RC (1980) On the ability of prey to recognize predators. Z Tierpsychol 54:71–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford FA (1982) Do inter- and intraspecific aggression vary in relation to predation pressure in sticklebacks? Anim Behav 30:909–916

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruuk H (1964) Predators and anti-predator behaviour of the black-headed gull (Larus ridibundus (L.)). Behaviour 11:1–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Losey GS (1981) Experience leads to attack of novel species by an interspecific territorial damselfish, Eupomacentrus fasciolatus. Anim Behav 29:1271–1272

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1974) Models in Ecology, Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore FR (1978) Interspecific aggression: Toward whom should a mockingbird be aggressive? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:173–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Niethammer G (1937–1942) Handbuch der deutschen Vogelkunde. Vol 1–3, Leipzig

  • Ortiz PR, Jenssen TA (1982) Interspecific aggression between lizard competitors, Anolis cooki and Anolis cristatellus. Z Tierpsychol 60:227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Owings DH, Coss RC (1977) Snake mobbing by California ground squirrels: Adaptive variation and ontogeny. Behaviour 62:50–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Owings DH, Coss RC (1981) How ground squirrels deal with snakes. Anima 99:37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DW (1976) The effect of a species-specific avoidance response to predatory starfish in the intertidal distribution of two gastropods. Oecologia (Berlin) 23:83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Regelmann K, Curio E (in press) Determinants of brood defence in the great tit Parus major L. Behav Ecol Sociobiol

  • Regelmann K, Curio E, Völkel P, Zell RA (submitted) The benefits of avian mobbing: Dilution of risk or attack interference?

  • Ricklefs RE (1973) Fecundity, mortality, and avian demography. In: Farner DS (ed) Breeding biology of birds, Nat Acad Sciences, Washington, pp 366–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherzinger W (1970) Zum Aktionssystem des Sperlingskauzes (Glaucidium passerinum (L)). Zoologica 118:1–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönn S (1978) Der Sperlingskauz. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg, Lutherstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Seghers BH (1973) An analysis of geographic variation in the antipredator adaptations of the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Ph D thesis, Univ British Columbia

  • Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Marler P (1980) Vervet monkey alarm calls: semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Anim Behav 28:1070–1094

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalter MD (1979) Responses of nesting passerines to alarm calls. Ibis 121:362–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedd DH (1982) Seasonal variation and function of mobbing and related antipredator behaviours of the American robin (Turdus migratorius). Auk 99:342–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith S, Hosking E (1955) Birds fighting. Faber & Faber Ltd London

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder NFR, Snyder HA (1971) Defenses of the Florida apple snail Pomacea paludosa. Behaviour 40:175–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry: The principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 2nd edn. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE (1976) Field experiments on species recognition by the threespot damselfish Eupomacentrus planifrons (Pisces: Pomacentridae). Anim Behav 24:562–569

    Google Scholar 

  • Thresher RE (1978) Territoriality and aggression in the threespot damselfish (Pisces: Pomacentridae): an experimental study of causation. Z Tierpsychol 46:401–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Uttendörfer O (1952) Neue Ergebnisse über die Ernährung der Greifvögel und Eulen. Ulmer Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon PJ, Burghardt GM (1979) The ophiophage defensive response in crotaline snakes: extension to new taxa. J Chem Ecology 5:141–151

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arbeitsgruppe für Verhaltensforschung, Abteilung für Biologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Postfach 1021 48, D-4630, Bochum, Federal Republic of Germany

    E. Curio, G. Klump & K. Regelmann

Authors
  1. E. Curio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. Klump
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. Regelmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curio, E., Klump, G. & Regelmann, K. An anti-predator response in the great tit (Parus major): Is it tuned to predator risk?. Oecologia 60, 83–88 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379324

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379324

Keywords

Search

Navigation