Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of the reproductive strategies of three species of Dysdercus from Africa (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Reproductive strategies have been investigated for three species of Dysdercus from Africa, D. intermedius, D. cardinalis and D. nigrofasciatus. Reproductive parameters were measured for each species on individuals cultured in the laboratory.

D. cardinalis is associated more with herbaceous than with arboreal host plants and is intermediate in body size. It tended to have the least age at first reproduction, reproduced most frequently, and layed the smallest clutches on average, spreading relatively high amounts of parental investment in more clutches than the other two species. It also laid the greatest number of clutches and eggs in a lifetime.

D. intermedius specializes on arboreal host plants, and is the largest of the three species. It had the greatest age at first reproduction, reproduced less frequently than D. cardinalis, and layed the largest clutches. Its parental investment over time declined earlier than that of D. cardinalis. D. intermedius layed the least number of clutches in a lifetime, but its lifetime gross reproduction was intermediate in magnitude.

D. nigrofasciatus has the widest diet breadth, and is the smallest in body size. Its age at first reproduction was similar to that of D. cardinalis, but D. nigrofasciatus reproduced least frequently, laying relatively large clutches. It was similar to D. intermedius in its pattern of parental investment over time, and essentially layed the same number of clutches in a lifetime as the latter species, although its lifetime gross reproduction was the smallest.

It is suggested that the reproductive strategies of the three species might have evolved as adaptations to selection events in the niches of the immature stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blueweiss L, Fox H, Kudzama V, Nakashima D, Peters, R, Sams S (1978) Relationship between body size and some life history parameters. Oecologia (Berlin) 37:257–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis NT (1975) Hormonal control of flight muscle histolysis in Dysdercus fulvoniger. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68:387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Derr JA (1980) Coevolution of the life history of a tropical seed-feeding insect. Ecology 61:881–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Derr JA, Alden B, Dingle H (1981) Insect life histories in relation to migration, body size, and host plant array: a comparative study of Dysdercus. J Anim Ecol 50:181–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingle H, Arora G (1973) Experimental studies of migration in bugs of the genus Dysdercus. Oecologia (Berlin) 12:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards FJ (1970) Endocrine control of flight muscle histolysis in Dysdercus intermedius. J Insect Physiol 16:2027–2031

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz RS, Stamp NE, Halverson TG (1982) Iteroparity and semelparity in insects. Am Nat 120:264–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesel JT (1976) Reproductive strategies as adaptations to life in temporally heterogeneous environments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:57–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie JH (1974) Natural selection for within-generation variance in offspring number. Genetics 76:601–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell MP, Southwood TRE (1978) Foraging strategies of insects. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 9:75–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1953) The concept of pattern in ecology. Proc Acad Nat Sci Philadel 105:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1969) Seed eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity and dispersal. Evolution 23:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen DH (1976) Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 7:347–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachaise D (1983) Reproductive allocation in tropical Drosophilidae: further evidence on the role of breeding-site choice. Am Nat 122:132–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1965) Selection for colonizing ability. In “The genetics of colonizing species”. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GI (eds) Academic Press, New York, pp 77–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin RC (1979) Fitness, survival and optimality. In “Analysis' of ecological systems”. In: Horn DJ, Stairs GR, Mitchell RD (eds) Ohio State University Press, Columbia, Ohio, USA, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd M, Dybas HS (1966) The periodical cicada problem, II: Evolution. Evolution 20:466–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy GI (1968) Pattern in life history and the environment. Am Nat 102:390–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson EO (1958) The insect pests of cotton in tropical Africa. Commonwealth Inst Entomol, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer WM (1974) Optimal reproductive effort in fluctuating environments. Am Nat 108:783–790

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmutterer H (1969) Pests of crops in northeast and central Africa. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1981) Biometry, 2nd ed. Freeman, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1962) Migration of terrestrial arthropods in relation to habitat. Biol Rev 37:171–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1976) Life history tactics: a review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol 51:3–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1977) Propagule size, number and dispersal in Ambystoma and Asclepias. Am Nat 111:43–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterholder B (1983) Opportunity-cost foraging models of stationary and mobile predators. Am Nat 122:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kasule, F.K. A comparison of the reproductive strategies of three species of Dysdercus from Africa (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Oecologia 65, 260–265 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379226

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00379226

Keywords

Navigation