Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of vapor pressure on stomatal control of gas exchange in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Increasing leaf to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) caused reductions in stomatal conductance of both current year and previous season needles of Pseudotsuga menziesii saplings. The stomata of current year needles were found to be more responsive to changes in VPD than those of previous season needles. The reductions in stomatal conductance of current year needles were not associated with decreases in xylem pressure potential. In fact, the reductions in stomatal conductance of current year needles were sometimes sufficient to reduce transpiration and thus raise xylem pressure potential even though VPD was increasing. There was a decline in stomatal responsiveness to VPD in current year needles between early and late summer. Pressure-volume curves determined for different age needles at different times of the year suggested that differences and changes in stomatal responsiveness to VPD may have been caused in part by differences and changes in needle water potential components. Hexane washes of current year needles during the late summer succeeded in partially restoring their VPD sensitivity, suggesting that changes in the water permeability of the external cuticle during needle maturation may also have played a role in causing the summer decline in VPD responsiveness.

In both current and previous year needles VPD-induced changes in stomatal conductance had a greater relative effect on transpiration (q w) than on net photosynthesis (PhN). In maturing needles the ratio of the sensitivities of transpiration and net photosynthesis to changes in stomatal conductance, (∂q w/∂g s)/∂PhN/∂g s), remained nearly constant as VPD was varied. This provides experimental support for a recent hypothesis that stomata respond to environmental fluctuations in such a manner as to maintain the above ratio constant, which optimizes CO2 uptake with respect to water loss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beardsell MF, Jarvis PG, Davidson B (1972) A null-balance diffusion porometer suitable for use with leaves of many shapes. J Appl Ecol 9:677–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham GE, Coyne PI (1977) A portable, temperature-controlled, steady-state porometer for field measurements of transpiration and photosynthesis. Photosynthetica 11:148–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliss LC, Mayo JM (1980) An ecophysiological investigation of the jackpine woodland with reference to revegetation of mined sands. Alberta Oil Sands Env Res Program VE 6.1

  • Cowan IR (1977) Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv Bot Res 4:117–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan IR, Farquhar GD (1977) Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. Symp Soc Exp Biol 31:471–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards ME, Meidner H (1978) Stomatal responses to humidity and water potentials of epidermal and mesophyll tissue. J Exp Bot 29:771–780

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD (1978) Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Aust J Plant Physiol 5:787–800

    Google Scholar 

  • Farquhar GD, Schulze ED, Küppers M (1980) Responses to humidity by stomata of Nicotiana glauca L. and Corylus avellana L. are consistent with the optimization of carbon dioxide uptake with respect to water loss. Aust J Plant Physiol 7:315–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace J, Malcom DC, Bradbury IK (1975) The effect of wind and humidity on leaf diffusive resistance in Sitka spruce seedlings. J Appl Ecol 12:931–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Hoffmann GJ (1976) Leaf conductance response to humidity and water transport in plants. Agronomy J 68:876–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall AE, Schulze ED (1980) Stomatal response to environment and a possible interrelation between stomatal effects on transpiration and CO2 assimilation. Plant, Cell and Env 3:467–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellqvist j, Richards GP, Jarvis PG (1974) Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in Sitka spruce trees measured with the pressure chamber. J Appl Ecol 11:637–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley TM, Duhme F, Hinckley AR, Richter H (1980) Water relations of drought hardy shrubs: Osmotic potential and stomatal reactivity. Plant, Cell and Env 3:131–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 24:519–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann MR (1976) Stomatal response of Engelmann spruce to humidity, light, and water stress. Plant Physiol 57:898–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann MR (1979) Stomatal control and the development of water deficit in Engelmann Spruce seedlings during drought. Can J For Res 9:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange OL, Lösch R, Schulz ED, Kappen L (1971) Responses of stomata to changes in humidity. Planta 100:76–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange OL, Medina E (1979) Stomata of the CAM plant Tillandsia recurvata respond directly to humidity. Oecologia 40:357–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow MM, Ibaraki K (1979) Stomatal control of water loss in siratro (Macroptilium atropurpureum (DC) Urb.), a tropical pasture legume. Ann Bot 43:639–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidner H (1975) Water supply, evaporation, and vapor diffusion in leaves. J Exp Bot 26:666–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidner H (1976a) Vapor loss through, stomatal pores with the mesophyll tissue excluded. J Exp Bot 27:172–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Meidner H (1976b) Water vapor loss from a physical model of a substomatal cavity. J Exp Bot 27:691–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer FC (1981) Water use efficiency in Douglas fir: The nature of plant response to selected environmental variables. Seattle WA, PhD Thesis, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer FC (1982) The effect of light on stomatal control of gas exchange in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings. Oecologia (in press)

  • Neilson RE, Jarvis PG (1975) Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) VI. Response of stomata to temperature. j Appl Ecol 12:879–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallardy SG, Kozlowski TT (1979) Stomatal response of Populus clones to light intensity and vapor pressure deficit. Plant Physiol 64:112–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawson HM, Woodward RG (1976) Photosynthesis and transpiration in dicotyledonous plants I. Expanding leaves of tobacco and sunflower. Aust J Plant Physiol 3:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SW, Knoerr KR (1977) Components of water potnetial estimated from xylem pressure measurements. Oecologia 28:191–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SW, Strain BR, Knoerr KR (1980) Seasonal patterns of leaf water relations in four co-occurring forest tree species: Parameters from pressure-volume curves. Oecologia 46:330–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Running SW (1976) Environmental control of leaf water conductance in conifers. Can J For Res 6:104–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo, DJ (1974) Factors affecting photosynthesis in Douglas fir. Seattle WA, PhD Thesis, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze ED, Lange OL, Buchsbom U, Kappen L, Evenari M (1972) Stomatal responses to changes in humidity in plants growing in the desert. Planta 108:259–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze ED, Lange OL, Evenari M, Kappen L, Buchsbom U (1975) The role of air humidity and temperature in controlling stomatal resistance of Prunus armeniaca L. under desert conditions III. The effect on water use efficiency. Oecologia 19:303–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Seybold A (1961/62) Ergebnisse und Probleme pflanzlicher Transpirationsanalysen. Jh Heidelberger Akad Wiss 6:5–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour VA (1980) Leaf cuticle: An investigation of some physical and chemical properties derived from a study of Berberis. Seattle WA, PhD Thesis, University of Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheriff DW (1979) Stomatal aperture and the sensing of environment by guard cells. Plant, Cell and Env 2:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheriff DW (1977) The effect of humidity on water uptake by, and viscous flow resistance of, excised leaves of a number of species: Physiological and anatomical observations. J Exp Bot 28:1399–1407

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan CS, Black TA, Nnymah JU (1977) Characteristics of stomatal diffusion resistance in a Douglas fir forest exposed to soil water deficits. Can J For Res 7:595–604

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MT, Hammel HT (1972) The measurement of the turgor pressure and the water relations of plants by the pressure bomb technique. J Exp Bot 23:267–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyree MT, Yianoulis P (1980) The site of water evaporation from sub-stomatal cavities, liquid path resistances, and hydroactive stomatal closure. Ann Bot 46:176–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts WR, Neilson RE (1978) Photosynthesis in Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) VIII. Measurements of stomatal conductance and 14CO2 uptake in controlled environments. J Appl Ecol 15:245–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteman PC, Koller D (1964) Environmental control of photosynthesis and transpiration in Pinus halepensis. Israel J Bot 13:166–176

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meinzer, F.C. The effect of vapor pressure on stomatal control of gas exchange in Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings. Oecologia 54, 236–242 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378398

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378398

Keywords

Navigation