Skip to main content
Log in

Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems,and reproductive success in plants

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The percentage of ovules developing into seeds (seed-ovule ratios, S/O ratios) is about 85% in annuals but only approximately 50% in perennials.In both annuals and perennials, these typical S/O ratios occur regardless of the kind of breeding system, although many annuals are normally self-pollinating whereas perennials are virtually all cross-pollinating. The mean number of seeds maturing within individual fruits is defined as brood size, and is correlated with different modes of dispersal and strategies of ovule packging. Annuals also have significantly higher brood sizes (21.7) than perennials (<9.9). Among perennials, woody plants have both lower S/O ratios (32.7%) and brood sizes (3.3) than herbaceous perennials (57.2%, 13.5). S/O ratios appear to be largely determined genetically, whereas resource limitations are perhaps more critical in terms of regulating flower production. Among perennials, increased exposure to predators and pathogens is suggested as the best explanation for theevolution of breeding systems favoring genetic recombination. The maintenance of genetic polymorphisms, however, inevitably increases the frequency of lethal and sub-lethal allelic combinations (and perhaps mutations?), that appear to be responsible for the lower S/O ratios in perennials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard RW, Jain SK (1962) Population studies in predominantly self-pollinated species. II. Analysis of quantitative genetic changes in a bulk-hybrid population of barley. Evolution 16:90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Apirion D, Zohary D (1961) Chlorophyll lethals in natural populations of orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.): a case of balanced polymorphism in plants. Genetics 46:393–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnow L, Albee B, Wycoff A (1980) Flora of the central Wasatch Front Utah. Museum of Natural History, University of Utah, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett MD (1972) Nuclear DNA content and minimum generation time in herbaceous plants. Proc R Soc Lond B 181:109–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertin RI (1982) Paternity and fruit production in trumpet creeper (Campsis radicans).Am Nat 119:694–709

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggers JD (1981) In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in human beings. New Engl J Med 304:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock SJ, Benton RA (1979) The reproductive strategies of five perennial compositae. J Ecology 67:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Brambell FWR (1948) Prenatal mortality in mammals. Biol Rev 23:370–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Brink RA, Cooper DC (1947) The endosperm in seed development. Bot Rev 13:423–477

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB (1983) The efficiency of pollen transfer and rates of embryo initiation. Oecologia (Berl) 59:262–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper BB, Wiens D (1981) Fixed rates of random ovule abortion in Cryptantha flava (Boraginaceae) and its possible relation to seed dispersal. Ecology 62:866–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov E (1979) Simultaneous hermaphroditism and sexual selection. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 76:2480–2484

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinnappa CC, Morton JK (1984) Studies on the Stellaria longipes complex (Caryophyllaceae) — Biosytematics. Systematic Bot 9:95–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden RW (1972) Pollinators in high elevation ecosystems: relative effectiveness of birds and bees. Science 176:1439–1440

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1876) The effects of cross-and self-fertilization in the vegetable kingdom. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeney P (1976) Plant apparency and chemical defense. In: Wallace J. Mansell R (eds) Biochemical interactions between plants and insects. Rec Adv Biochem 10:1–40

  • Gillett JB (1962) Pest pressure, an underestimated factor in evolution. Syst Assoc Publ 4:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V (1975) Genetics of flowering plants. Columbia Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V (1982) Periodicities in the chromosome numbers of angiosperms. Bot Gaz 143:379–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant V, Flake RH (1974) Solution to the cost-of-selection dilemma. Proc NatAcad Sci USA 71:3865–3865

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane JBS (1957) The cost of natural selection. J Genetics 55:511–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamrick JL (1979) Genetic variation and longevity. In: Solbrig OT, Jain S, Johnson GB, Raven PH (eds) Topics in plant population biology. Columbia Univ Press, New York, pp 89–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert SJ (1979) Density studies on lupines. II. Components of seed yield. Ann Bot 43:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen D (1977) A note on optimal mate selection in plants. Am Nat 11:365–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MP, Cook SA (1968) “Clutch size” in buttercups. Am Nat 102:405–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee TD, Bazzaz FA (1982) Regulation of fruit and seed production in an annual legume, Cassia fasciculata. Ecology 63:1363–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin D (1975) Pest pressure and recombination systems in plants. Am Nat 109:437–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin DA, Turner BL (1978) Clutch size in Compositae. In: Stonehouse BD, Perrins CM (eds) Evolutionary ecology, Univ Park Press, Baltimore, pp 215–222

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1978) Clutch size in plants. Nature 276:671–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Munz PA (1974) A flora of southern California. Univ Calif Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Nittancourt D de (1977) Incompatibility in angiosperms. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornduff R (1969) Reproductive biology in relation to systematics. Taxon 18:121–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Renner O (1917) Versuche über die gametische Konstitution der Oenotheren. Z Bot 13:609–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury EJ (1942) Reproductive capacity of plants. Bell Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1983)Breeding systems and habitat effects on fitness components in three neotropical Costus (Zingiberaceae). Evolution 37:523–539

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson AJ (1981) Flower and fruit abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 12:253–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe EP (1981) Understanding evolution. 4th ed, Wm C Brown Co, Dubuque

    Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M, Rice B (1982) Evolution of the seed plants and inclusive fitness of plant tissues. Evolution 36:713–728

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson MF (1983) Plant reproductive ecology. Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt R (1981) Components of reproductive fitness in five tropical legumes. Bull Torrey Bot Club 108:67–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wiens, D. Ovule survivorship, brood size, life history, breeding systems,and reproductive success in plants. Oecologia 64, 47–53 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377542

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377542

Keywords

Navigation