Summary
Branch growth and leaf formation from terminal and from lateral buds of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.) were measured in response to simulated insect defoliation. A single large branch representative of the crown of each tree was used for enumeration of growth and of bud numbers throughout three successive years of 0, 50, 75, and 100% leaf removal for the entire tree. Leaf number per tree for both species after the last year of defoliation was reduced in direct proportion to the severity of defoliation, in comparison to the predefoliation status of the trees. Bud number per tree for red maple, but not for red oak, was also reduced in proportion to severity of defoliation.
Averaged over all defoliation treatments, defoliation reduced branch growth more than leaf production. Furthermore, the reduction in branch growth and leaf production was greater in red oak than in red maple. Three years of successive defoliation reduced the mean lateral plus terminal branch growth by 40% in red oak and by 23% in red maple, while leaf number was reduced 22% in red oak and remained unchanged in red maple. In red maple, 100% defoliation caused greater branch death than the 50 or 75% defoliation treatments, and the amount of death was greater after each successive year of defoliation. In contrast to red maple, undefoliated red oak incurred a substantial amount of branch death throughout the study which was little affected by defoliation treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker WL (1941) Effect of gypsy moth defoliation on certain trees. J Forest 39:1017–1022
Campbell RW, Sloan RJ (1977) Forest stand responses to defoliation by the gypsy moth. Forest Sci Monograph 19, p 34
Giese RL, Houston DR, Benjamin DM, Kuntz JE (1964) A new condition of sugar maple. Part I. pp 1–19 In: Studies of Maple Blight. Univ Wis Res Bull 250: p 128
Heichel GH, Turner NC (1976) Phenology and leaf growth of defoliated hardwood trees. In: Anderson J, Kaya H (eds) Perspectives in forest entomology, Academic Press, New York pp 31–40
Heichel GH, Turner NC (1983) CO2 assimilation of primary and regrowth foliage of red maple (Acer rubrum L) and red oak (Quercus rubra L): adaptation to defoliation. Oecologia (Berlin) 57:14–19
Heichel GH, Turner NC, Walton GS (1972) Anthracnose causes dieback of regrowth on defoliated oak and maple. Plant Dis Rptr 56:1046–1047
Hodson AC (1981) The response of aspen (Populus tremuloides) to artificial defoliation. Great Lakes Entomol 14:167–169
Houston DR, Kuntz JE (1964) Pathogens associated with the maple blight. Part VII. pp 58–79 In: Studies of Maple Blight. Univ Wis Res Bull 250 p 128
Kegg JD (1973) Oak mortality caused by repeated gypsy moth defoliations in New Jersey. J Econ Ent 66:639–641
Minott CW, Guild IT (1925) Some results of the defoliation of trees. J Econ Ent 18:345–348
Nichols, JO (1970) Oak mortality. Penn Dept Forest and Waters, Harrisburg, PA Forest Pest Rep 43:2
Staley JM (1965) Decline and mortality of red and scarlet oaks. For Sci 11:2–17
Stephens GR (1971) The relation of insect defoliation to mortality in Connecticut forests. Conn Agric Exp Stn Bull 723:16
Stephens GR (1981) Defoliation and mortality in Connecticut forests. Conn Agr Exp Stn Bull 796:13
Turner NC, Heichel GH (1977) Stomatal development and seasonal changes in diffusive resistance of primary and regrowth foliage of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.). New Phytol 78:71–81
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heichel, G.H., Turner, N.C. Branch growth and leaf numbers of red maple (Acer rubrum L.) and red oak (Quercus rubra L.): response to defoliation. Oecologia 62, 1–6 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377364
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377364