Skip to main content
Log in

Scorpions, spiders and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Scorpions, spiders and solpugids are generalist predators on the same types of arthropod prey. However, these potential competitors also frequently eat one another (=intraguild predation). In a 29 mo. experiment, >6,000 scorpions were removed from 300 (10x10m) quadrats. Significantly more spiders (but not solpugids) occurred in removal versus control quadrats. Two alternate hypotheses potentially explain this result: exploitation competition for jointly exploited prey or intraguild predation. There was no evidence of exploitation competition: no differences existed between removal and control quadrats in prey abundance or spider size and reproductive characteristics. It appears that the release from predation pressure in areas from which scorpions were removed produced the observed increase in spider abundance. Current ecological theory does not fully apply to situations whereby species at the same trophic level interact as both predators and potential competitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham BJ (1983) Spatial and temporal patterns in a sagebrush steppe spider community (Arachnida: Araneae). Journal of Arachnology 11:31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred DM and Kaston BJ (1983) A list of Utah spiders with their localities. Great Basin Naturalist 43:494–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME (1984) Pertubation experiments in community ecology: Theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Davidson D, Reichman O (1979) An experimental study of competition between seed eating desert rodents and ants. Amer Zool 19:1129–1143

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew M (1961) Ecology of the spiders of a desert community. New York Entomological Society 69:5–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloudsley-Thompson JL (1958) Spiders, scorpions, centipedes and mites. Pergamon Press Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloudsley-Thompson JL (1977) Adaptational biology of solifugae (Solpugida). Bull British Arachnol Soc 4:61–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1983) On the prevelence and relative importance of interspecific competition: Evidence from field experiments. Amer Natur 122:661–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford CS (1981) Biology of desert invertebrates. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (1982) The biology of spiders. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertsch WJ, Reichert SE (1976) The spacial and temporal partitioning of a desert spider community, with description of new species. Amer Mus Novit 2604:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt RD (1984) Spatial heterogeneity, indirect interactions, and coexistence of prey species. Amer Natur 124:377–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaston BJ (1982) How to know the spiders. Wm C Brown Co, Dubuque, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Mares M, Blair W, Enders F, Greegor D, Hulse A, Hunt J, Otte D, Sage R, Tomoff C (1977) The strategies and community patterns of desert animals. In: Orians GH, Davies NB (eds) Convergent evolution in warm deserts. Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Stroudsburg, Pa, pp 107–163

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick SJ, Polis GA (1986) Comparison of the diet of Paruroctonus mesaensis at two sites. Proceedings of the IX International Congress of Arachnology, Panama (in press)

  • McCormick SJ, Polis GA (1987) Prey, predators and parasites. Chap 7. In: Polis GA (ed), Biology of Scorpions. Stanford Univ Press, Palo Alto, CA (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally RC (1983) On assessing the significance of interspecific competition to guild structure. Ecology 64:1646–1652

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma MH (1963) Solpugida of the Nevada test site. Sci Bull Brig Young Univ (Bio Ser) 3(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma MH (1966) Feeding behavior of North American Solpugida (Arachnida). Florida Entomol 49:199–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma MH (1974) Solpugid populations in southwestern New Mexico. Florida Entomol 57:385–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Muma MH (1979) Arid-grassland solpugid population variations in southwestern New Mexico. Florida Entomol 62:320–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuessly GS, Goeden RD (1984) Aspects of the biology and ecology of Diguetia mojavea Gertsch (Araneae, Diguetidae). J Arachnol 12:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1979) Prey and feeding phenology of the desert sand scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke (Vaejovidae). J Zool (London) 188:333–346

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1984) Age structure component of niche width and intraspecific resource partitioning: Can age groups function as ecological species? Amer Natur 123:541–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA (1987) Ecology of scorpions. Chap 6. In: Polis GA (ed) Biology of Scorpions. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Farley RD (1979) Characteristics and environmental determinants of natality, growth and maturity in a natural population of the desert scorpion, Paruroctonus mesaensis Stahnke. J Zool (London) 187:517–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Farley RD (1980) Population biology of a desert scorpion: Survivorship, microhabitat, and the evolution of life history strategy. Ecology 61:620–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Sissom WD, McCormick SJ (1981) Predators of scorpions: Field data and a review. J Arid Envir 4:309–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Root RB (1967) The niche exploitation pattern of the blue-gray gnatcatcher. Ecol Monogr 37:317–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmoller R (1970) Terrestrial desert arthropods: Fauna and ecology. Biol 52:77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1968) The Anolis lizards of Bimini: Resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49:704–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1974) Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1982) The controversy over interspecific competition. Amer Scient 70:586–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1983) Field experiments on interspecific competition. Amer Natur 122:240–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW, Toft CA (1983) Spider populations: extraordinary high densities on islands without top predators. Science 219:1353–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1983) Competition theory, hypothesis testing, and other community ecological buzzwords. Amer Natur 122:626–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Turnbull A (1973) Ecology of the true spiders (Araneomorphae). Ann Rev Ent 18:305–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Waide RB, Reagan DP (1983) Competition between West Indian anoles and birds. Amer Natur 121:133–138

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Polis, G.A., McCormick, S.J. Scorpions, spiders and solpugids: predation and competition among distantly related taxa. Oecologia 71, 111–116 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377328

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377328

Key words

Navigation