Summary
Asymmetry in binary data arises when one of the two states (e.g. state “1”) is interpreted as more informative than the other state. A common example in ecology occurs when one state represents presence of some unit and the other state represents absence. The problem of the classification of individuals based upon a set of such characters is related to the goal of group homogeneity. The homogeneity of a group of individuals is defined as the count over all possible pairs of individuals and all characters, of the number of shared 1 states, minus the number of mismatches or 0–1, 1-0 combinations. The shared 0 states are effectively neutral, then, in terms of 1-state homogeneity.
The behaviour of some common binary similarity measures is examined in relation to 1-state homogeneity. Although the Jaccard coefficient comes close to having the desired behaviour it exhibits undesirable behaviour for some data values and a proportionality relationship between matches and mismatches that may not always be desirable. A new coefficient, “C”, is introduced which overcomes these problems and leads to homogeneous classifications in the sense described above. Further general recommendations are made for the use of these coefficients in various contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baroni-Urbani C, Buser MW (1976) Similarity of binary data. Syst Zool 25:251–259
Clifford HT, Stephenson W (1975) An introduction to numerical classification. Academic Press, New York, p 229
Farris JS (1979) The information content of the phylogenetic system. Syst Zool 28:483–519
Janowitz MF (1980) Similarity measures on binary data. Syst Zool 29:342–359
Sneath PHA Sokal RR (1973) Numerical taxonomy. WH Freeman and Co., San Francisco, p 573
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Faith, D.P. Asymmetric binary similarity measures. Oecologia 57, 287–290 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377169
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377169