Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae)

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We studied behavioral mechanisms underlying the spatial distribution of Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) females searching for larval host plants on a flat plain in Colorado. The rate of female movement, as represented by an empirically estimated diffusion coefficient, is affected by two factors. First, when searching in areas of high host-plant density, females tend to make sharper turns and fly for shorter distances between landings, compared to areas of low plant density. As a result, the rate of female displacement is lowered when they search in areas of high host-plant density, and thus females tend to aggregate in such areas. The second factor affecting female movement is the presence of males. Harassment by males induces females to increase the rate of their movement, and females are often chased out of host patches by males. Our results explain the observed spatial and temporal patterns of female distribution in relation to the distribution of host plants and males. In years when host plants are plentiful, harrassement by males in one host patch induces females to move to another. This pattern of female movement tends to disrupt the relationship between the spatial distributions of host plants and females, as well as females and males. In the year when hosts were concentrated in a single large patch, females could not easily avoid male harassment, and consequently we observed strong corelations of female-host distributions and male-female distributions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brussard PF, Ehrlich PR, Singer MC (1974) Adult movements and population structure in Euphydryas editha. Evolution 28:408–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappuccino N, Kareiva P (1985) Coping with capricious environment: a population study of the rare woodland butterfly Pieris virginiensis. Ecology 66:152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney SP, Duggan AE (1983) The biology of the orange tip butterfly Anthocaris cardamines in Britain. Ecol Entomol 8:271–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullenward MJ, Ehrlich PR, White RR, Holdren CE (1979) The ecology and population genetics of an alpine checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas anicia. Oecologia 38:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaconis P, Efron B (1983) Computer-intensive methods in statistics. Sci Am 248:116–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T, Wright S (1943) Genetics of natural populations. X. Dispersion rates in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 28:304–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Efron B (1982) The jacknife, the bootstrap and other resampling plans. SIAM Monograph No. 38

  • Ehrlich PR, Murphy DD (1981) The population biology of the checkerspot butterflies (Euphydryas). Biol Zentralbl 100:613–629

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, White RR, Singer MC, McKechnie SW, Gilbert LE (1975) Checkerspot butterflies: a historical perspective. Science 176:221–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris CD, Brown FM (1981) Butterflies of the Rocky Mountain States. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, Oklahoma, pp 331–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes JL (1981) The population ecology of a natural population of the pierid butterfly Colias alexandria. Oecologia 49:188–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwasa Y, Odendaal FJ, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR, Launer AL (1983) Emergence patterns in male butterflies: a hypothesis and a test. Theor Pop Biol 23:363–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R (1977) Movement patterns and egg distribution in cabbage butterflies. J Anim Ecol 46:195–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1982) Experimental and mathematical analyses of herbivore movement: quantifying the influence of plant spacing and quality on foraging discrimination. Ecol Monogr 52:261–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM (1983) Local movement in herbivorous insects: applying a passive diffucion model to mark-recapture field experiments. Oecologia 57:322–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Kareiva PM, Shigesada N (1983) Analyzing insect movement as a correlated random walk. Oecologia 56:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG (1983a) Thermoregulation and flight in Colias butterflies: elevational patterns and mechanistic limitations. Ecology 64:534–545

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsolver JG (1983b) Ecological significance of flight activity in Colias butterflies: implications for reproductive strategy and population structure. Ecology 64:546–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1981) The role of theoreticalecology in the description and understanding of populations in heterogeneous environements. Am Zool 21:865–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovely PS, Dahlquist FW (1975) Statistical measures of bacterial motility and chemotaxis. J Theor Biol 50:477–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh LM, Jones RE (1988) The form and consequences of random walk movement models. (in press)

  • Murphy DD, Menninger MS, Ehrlich PR (1984) Nectar source distribution as a determinant of oviposition host species in Euphydryas chalcedona. Oecologia 62:269–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal FJ, Iwasa Y, Ehrlich PR (1985) Duration of female availability and its effect on butterfly mating systems. Am Nat 125:673–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal FJ, Turchin P, Stermitz FR (1988) An incidental-effect hypothesis explaining aggregation of males in a population of Euphydryas anicia. Am Nat 132:735–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Odendaal FJ, Jones KN, Stermitz FR (1989) Mating behavior and male investment in Euphydryas anicia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). J Res Lep (in press)

  • Okubo A (1980) Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Mathematical Problems. Springer, Heidelberg Berlin New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rausher MD (1985) Variability for host preference in insect populations: mechanistic and evolutionary models. J Insect Physiol 31(11):873–889

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed WJ (1983) Confidence estimation of ecological aggregation indices based on counts—a robust procedure. Biometrics 39:987–998

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutowski RL (1978) The form and function of ascending flights in Colias butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields O (1967) Hilltopping. J Res Lep 6:69–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC (1972) Complex components of habitat suitability within a butterfly colony. Science 173:75–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC (1982) Quantification of host preference by manipulation of oviposition behavior in the butterfly Euphydryas editha. Oecologia 52:224–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer MC, Ehrlich PR (1979) Population dynamics of the checkerspot butterfly Euphydryas editha. Fortschr Zool 25:53–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam JG (1973) The formulation and interpretation of mathematical models of diffusionary processes in population biology. In: Bartlett MS, Hiorns RW (eds) The mathematical theory of the dynamics of biological population. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–85

    Google Scholar 

  • White RR (1979) Foodplant of alpine Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). J Lep Soc 33:170–173

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Odendaal, F.J., Turchin, P. & Stermitz, F.R. Influence of host-plant density and male harassment on the distribution of female Euphydryas anicia (Nymphalidae). Oecologia 78, 283–288 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377167

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377167

Key words

Navigation