Skip to main content
Log in

Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The nest locations of two ant species in the Colorado Desert are intraspecifically overdispersed. Intraspecific overdispersion has been thought to represent strong intraspecific competition. Here we consider this hypothesis along with three competing hypotheses: microhabitat selection by foundress queens, predation on foundress queens, and predation on established colonies. To test these hypotheses five types of data were collected: (1) the forager population sizes of Veromessor pergandei and Pogonomyrmex californicus, (2) the response of the territory use of V. pergandei to varying levels of food, (3) the encounter rates of conspecifics and other ant species to foundress queens artificially placed near and far from conspecific colonies, (4) predation on colonies as a function of colony spacing, and (5) the relationship between the plant microhabitat at the nest and colony spacing. The results show that established colonies have no apparent selectivity for a particular type of plant microhabitat nor do foundress queens show avoidance or attraction toward conspecifics. V. pergandei workers show only a slight ability to find V. pergandei queens that are artificially placed near their entrances. Certain spiders are the most common ant predators on our study area. Direct observations on spiders indicate that colonies with closer neighbors are not prone to a higher risk of predation. In addition, the estimates of the death rate of workers from a mark-recapture technique indicate that colonies with closer neighbors lose similar numbers of workers as compared to colonies with further neighbors. In favor of the competition hypothesis, the summed size of intraspecific nearest neighbor pairs are larger for colonies that are spaced further apart than those colonies that are spaced closer together. We also develop an index of foraging directionality for the column foraging species V. pergandei. Using this measure, we find that nearest neighbors tend to avoid foraging toward each other. The response of territory use to food levels was tested with experiments involving patches of cracked wheat. These experiments showed that patches away from nearest neighbors were found significantly sooner than patches toward nearest neighbors. The above five sets of data together suggest that resource competition and perhaps queen predation by established colonies account for the intraspecific spatial patterns of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartz SH, Holldobler B (1982) Colony founding in Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and the evolution of foundress associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 10:137–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR (1956) A study of mutual occurrence of plant species. Ecology 37:21–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess JW, Ralston D, Shaw E (1982) Territorial aggregation: An ecological spacing strategy in acorn woodpeckers. Ecology 63:575–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson DM, Gentry JB (1973) Effects of shading on the migratory behavior of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 54:452–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew RN (1979) Mammalian predation on honey ants, Myrmecocystus (Formicidae). Southwest Nat 24:677–682

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBruin MK, Rost LCM, Draisma FGAM (1977) Estimates of the number of foraging ants with the Lincoln-index method in relation to the colony size of Formica polyctena. J Anim Ecol 46:457–470

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVita J (1979) Mechanisms of interference and foraging among colonies of the harvester ant Pogonomyrmex californicus in the Mojave Desert. Ecology 60:729–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmes GW (1974) The spatial distribution of a population of two ants species living in limestone grassland. Pedobiologia 14:412–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson JM (1972) Mark-recapture techniques for population estimates of Pogonomyrmex ant colonies: An evaluation of the 32P technique. Ann Entomol Soc Am 65:57–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentry JB (1974) Response to predation by colonies of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 55:1328–1338

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon SA (1978) Food and foraging ecology of a desert harvester ant, Veromessor pergandei (Mayr), Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JS, Gentry JB (1981) Foraging pattern, colony distribution, and foraging range of the Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius. Ecology 62:1467–1473

    Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B (1970) Steatoda fulva (Theridiidae), a spider that feeds on harvester ants. Psyche 77:202–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Holldobler B (1979) Territoriality in ants. Meetings of the American Philosophical Society pp 211–219

  • Holldobler B (1981) Foraging and spatiotemporal territories in the honey ant Myrmecocystus mimicus Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:310–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks HB (1929) The honey ant Myrmecocystus melliger at San Antonio, Texas. Bulletin Brooklyn Entomological Society 24:32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Pielou EC (1960) A single mechanism to account for regular, random, and aggregated populations. J Ecol 48:575–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter SD, Jorgensen CD (1981) Foragers of the harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex owyheei: A disposable caste? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 9:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Rissing SW (1981) Prey preferences in the desert horned lizard: influence of prey foraging method and aggressive behavior. Ecology 62:1031–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti RT, Case TJ (1984) Spatial patterns and diet overlap between colonies of three desert ant species. Oecologia (Berlin) 62:401–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer DT Jr, Whitford WG (1981) Behaviorial responses of a predator, the round tailed horned lizard, Phrynosoma modestum and its prey, the honey pot ant, Myrmecocystus spp. Am Midl Nat 105:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair DF (1985) On tests of spatial randomness using mean nearest neighbor distance. Ecology 66:1084–1085

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler GC, Wheeler J (1973) Ants of Deep Canyon. University of California, Riverside

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG (1978) Foraging in seed-harvesting ants Pogonomyrmex spp. Ecology 59:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WG, Byrant M (1979) Behavior of a predator and its prey: The horned lizard (Phrynosoma cornutum) and harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.). Ecology 60:686–694

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodell SRS, Mooney HA, Hill AJ (1969) The behavior of Larrea divaricata (Creosote bush) in response to rainfall in California. J Ecol 57:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaton RI (1978) A cyclical relationship between Larrea tridentata and Opuntia leptocaulis in the Northern Mohave Desert. J Ecol 66:651–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeaton RI, Cody ML (1976) Competition and spacing in plant communities: The Northern Mojave Desert. J Ecol 49:255–269

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ryti, R.T., Case, T.J. Overdispersion of ant colonies: a test of hypotheses. Oecologia 69, 446–453 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377067

Keywords

Navigation