Skip to main content
Log in

Prey selection by an intertidal beetle: field test of an optimal diet model

  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Adult beetles Thinopinus pictus LeConte (Staphlyinidae) live on sand beaches in temporary burrows from which they emerge at night to prey on amphipods Orchestoidea calforniana (Brandt). I constructed models of amphipod size selection by beetles, using the size distributions of amphipods measured on the beach, and the results of laboratory experiments on capture success, reaction distance and feeding rates. Capture success decreased and the probability that an amphipod was detected increased with increasing amphipod size. Beetles observed during beach searches selected larger sizes of amphipods than predicted from availability and vulnerability of different sizes. To apply an optimal foraging model, I estimated the profitability of different sizes of amphipods from the number of amphipods of a given size required to satiate a beetle in the laboratory. Profitability was highest for large amphipods and lowest for small amphipods and isopods. However, amphipod abundance on the beach was always below the threshold at which specialization on larger sizes was predicted to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barnard CJ, Brown CAJ (1981) Prey size selection and competition in the common shrew (Sorex araneus L.). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 8:239–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers DE (1963) Field identification of five species of Californian beach hoppers (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Pac Sci 17:315–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownell P, Farley RD (1979) Prey-localizing behaviour of the nocturnal desert scorption, Paruroctonus mesaensis: orientation to substrate vibrations. Anim Behav 27:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1976) Optimal foraging: Attack strategy of amantid. Amer Natur 110:141–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson J (1978) Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59:211–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig PC (1970) The behavior and distribution of the intertidal sand beetle, Thinopinus pictus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae). Ecology 51:1012–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig PC (1973a) Orientation of the sand-beach amphipod, Orchestoidea corniculata. Anim Behav 21:699–706

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig PC (1973b) Behaviour and distribution of the sand-beach amphipod Orchestoidea corniculata. Mar Biol 23:101–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson DW (1978) Experimental tests of the optimal diet in two social insects Behav Ecol Sociobiol 4:35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers DM (1977) The nature of prey selection by planktivorous fish. Ecology 58:46–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Elner RW, Hughes (1978) Energy maximization in the diet of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. J Anim Ecol 47:103–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner MB (1981) Mechanisms of size selectivity by planktivorous fish: a test of hypotheses. Ecology 62:571–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Goss-Custard JD (1977) Optimal foraging and the size selection of worms by redshank (Tringa totanus). Anim Behav 25:10–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood JJD, Elton RA (1979) Analyzing experiments on frequency-dependent selection by predators. J Anim Ecol 48:721–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths D (1980) The feeding biology of ant-lion larvae: prey capture, handling and utilization. J Anim Ecol 49:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths D (1981) Sub-optimal foraging in the ant-lion Macroleon quinquemaculatus. J Anim Ecol 50:697–702

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1966) The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem Entomol Soc Can 48:1–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger RG, Barnard DE (1981) Foraging tactics of a terrestial salamander: Choice of diet in structurally simple environments. Amer Natur 117:639–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Krebs JR (1978) Optimal foraging decision rules for predators. In JR Krebs, NB Davies (eds), Behavioral ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass p 23–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch WW, Oaten A (1975) Predation and population stability. Adv Ecol Res 9:1–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh P (1981) Size-selective predation on Daphnia by Neomysis mercedis. Ecology 62:894–900

    Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo JE (1979) Indices of food preference by a predator. J Fish Res Board Can 36:470–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastorok RA (1981) Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecology 62:1311–1324

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliam HR (1974) On the theory of optimal diets. Amer Natur 108:59–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke GH, Pulliam HR, Charnov EL (1977) Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Quart Rev Biol 52:137–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards LJ (1982) Foraging behaviour of the intertidal beetle Thinopinus pictus (Staphylinidae). PhD thesis, University of British Columbia

  • Zach R (1978) Selection and dropping of whelks by northwestern crows. Behavior 67:134–148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richards, L.J. Prey selection by an intertidal beetle: field test of an optimal diet model. Oecologia 55, 325–332 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376920

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376920

Keywords

Navigation