Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of a filling catheter during urodynamics

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective crossover study of 35 patients was performed to investigate the effect of a filling catheter upon closure pressure, functional length, and total urethral length. Urethral pressure profiles were done while the patients were in the sitting position with a full bladder, both with and without a 6 F pediatric feeding tube in the urethra. Both closure pressure and functional length were significantly higher with the filling catheter in situ. Urethral pressure profiles were different in all patients with the filling catheter in place. Urethral pressure profiles and cystometrograms should be done without filling catheters, using the smallest microtransducer catheters available, to avoid artifactual effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Millar HD, Baker LE. A stable ultraminiature catheter-tip pressure transducer. Med Biol Eng 1973; 11: 86–89

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Simultaneous urethrocystometry and urethral pressure profile measurement with a new technique. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1975; 54: 385–386

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asmussen M, Ulmsten U. Simultaneous urethro-cystometry with a new technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1976; 10: 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  4. Teague CT, Merrill DC. Laboratory comparison of urethral profilometry techniques. Urology 1979; 13: 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leach GE, Farsii A, Raz S. New dual-channel microtip transducer catheter for urethral pressure profile and cystometry. Urology 1982; 20: 555–557

    Google Scholar 

  6. Plante P, Susset J. Studies of female urethral pressure profile. Part I. The normal urethral pressure profile. J Urol 1980; 123: 64–69

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rud T, Anderson K-E, Asmussen M, Hunting A, Ulmsten U. Factors maintaining the urethral pressure in women. Invest Urol 1980; 17: 343–347

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hald T (chairman): The International Continence Society Committee on Standardization of Terminology. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function. Glasgow: The International Continence Society, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  9. Koraitim M. Catheter as source of error in urodynamic study. Urology 1982; 20: 223–225

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cass AS, Hinman F. Constant urethral flow in the female dog. III: Obstructive effects of a small recording catheter with and without urethral stenosis. Invest Urol 1968; 6: 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  11. Susset J, Plante P. Studies of female urethral pressure profile. Part II. Urethral pressure profile in female incontinence. J Urol 1980; 123: 70–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sand, P.K., Bowen, L.W. & Ostergard, D.R. The effect of a filling catheter during urodynamics. Int Urogynecol J 1, 124–127 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376594

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376594

Keywords

Navigation