Skip to main content
Log in

Survey of garnets for fossil fission tracks

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Andradites and spessartines contain enough uranium to make these minerals interesting for fission track dating. Almandines and pyropes usually are not favourable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Fleischer, R. L., Price, P. B.: Techniques for geological dating of minerals by chemical etching of fission fragment tracks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 28, 1705–1714 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D., Muralli, A. V., Rajan, R. S., Tamhane, A. S., Lorin, J. C., Pellas, P.: Techniques for proper revelation and viewing of etch-tracks in meteoritic and terrestrial minerals. Earth Plan. Sci. Lett. 5, 111–119 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeser, C. W., Dodge, F. G. W.: Fission-track ages of accessory minerals from granitic rocks of the central Sierra Nevada batholith, California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 80, 2201–2212 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeser, G. W., Faul, H.: Fission track annealing in apatite and sphene. J. Geophys. Res. 74, 705–710 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haack, U.K., Gramse, M. Survey of garnets for fossil fission tracks. Contr. Mineral. and Petrol. 34, 258–260 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373298

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00373298

Keywords

Navigation