Skip to main content
Log in

Hydroxyethylstarch deposits in human skin — a model for pruritus?

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Severe itching for unknown reasons has been reported after administration of hydroxyethylstarch (HES) in haemodilution therapy of humans. After HES treatment, vacuoles in cells of various organs in humans have been shown, predominantly affecting the mononuclear phagocyte system. These vacuoles present indirect evidence for phagocytosis of HES particles. Since phagocytosis is also known to occur in the skin, this organ might represent a target for HES deposition, resulting in subsequent release of mediators responsible for the observed itching. The aim of the present investigation was to study skin biopsies of patients, who had received HES and suffered subsequently from itch. Skin sections were investigated for morphological impairment by means of light and electron microscopy, immunohistochemistry and immunoelectron microscopy using a polyclonal anti-HES antiserum. Storage of HES was demonstrated in the skin of all patients, mainly in dermal macrophages, endothelial cells of blood and lymph vessels, some perineural cells and endoneural macrophages of larger nerve fascicles, some keratinocytes and Langerhans cells. Treatment with antihistaminic agents proved ineffective in these patients; this fits with the observation that morphological signs of histamine release from mast cells were absent. These findings indicate that other mediators from HES-affected cells must be responsible for the development of the itching. Thus, investigation of HES storage may be a useful contribution to the elucidation of release of itch mediators and induction of pruritus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ansel J, Perry P, Brown J, Damm D, Phan T, Hart D, Luger T, Hefeneider S (1990) Cytokine modulation of keratinocyte cytokines. J Invest Dermatol 94: 101S-107S

    Google Scholar 

  2. Csató M, Bozóky B, Hunyadi J, Dobozy A (1986) Candida albicans phagocytosis by separated human epidermal cells. Arch Dermatol Res 279: 136–139

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cullen MJ, Singer M (1990) Severe anaphylactoid reaction to hydroxyethyl starch. Anaesthesia 45: 1041–1042

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dienes HP, Gerharz CD, Wagner R, Weber M, John HD (1986) Accumulation of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in the liver of patients with renal failure and portal hypertension. J Hepatol 3: 223–227

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dowd PM, Camp RDR, Greaves MW (1988) Effect of human recombinant IL-1 in normal human skin. Skin Pharmacol 1: 36–40

    Google Scholar 

  6. Foreman JC (1989) Peptides, neurogenic inflammation and itch. Skin Pharmacol 2: 220

    Google Scholar 

  7. HÄgermark O (1989) Histamine, serotonin, prostaglandins and cytokines. Skin Pharmacol 2: 219

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hermann J, Gall H (1990) Diognose und Therapie des persistierenden Pruritus nach Infusion von HydroxyÄthylstÄrke (HÄS). Aktuel Dermatol 16: 166–167

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hong B, Zhong T (1988) Studies on the side-effect of hydroxyethyl starch injections. Yaoxue Tongbao 23: 51

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hulse JD, Jacobi A (1983) An overview of the colloid and its metabolism. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 17: 334–341

    Google Scholar 

  11. Humphrey JH, Grennan D (1981) Different macrophage populations distinguished by means of fluorescent polysaccharides. Recognition and properties of marginal-zone macrophages. Eur J Immunol 11: 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hsu SM, Raine L, Fanger H (1981) Use of a avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex in immunoperoxidase techniques. J Histochem Cytochem 29: 577–580

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jarecki-Black JC, Atkins L, Pratt KM, Pepkowitz SH, Glassman AB (1986) Effect of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in reducing parasite load in experimental visceral Leishmaniasis. Ann Clin Lab Sci 16: 450–454

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jesch F, Hubner G, Zumtobel V, Zimmermann M, Me\mer K (1979) Hyroxyethylstarke (HES 450/0.7) in Plasma und Leber. Konzentrationsverlauf und histologische VerÄnderungen beim Menschen. Infusionstherapie 6: 112–117

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kroemer H, Haa\ A, Müller K, JÄger H, Wagner EM, Heimburg P, Klotz U (1987) Hemodilution therapy in ischemic stroke: pharmacokinetics and plasma viscosity during long term infusion of dextran 40 or hetastarch 200/0.5. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 31: 705–711

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindblad G, Falk J (1976) Konzentrationsverlauf von HydroxyÄthylstÄrke und Dextran in Serum und Lebergewebe von Kaninchen und die histopathologischen Folgen der Speicherung von HydroxyethylstÄrke. Infusionstherapie 2: 301–303

    Google Scholar 

  17. Me\mer K, Kreimeier U, Intaglietta M (1986) Present state of intentional hemodilution. Eur Surg Res 18: 254–263

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakasato SK (1982) Evaluation of hetastarch. Clin Pharm 1: 509–514

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parker NE, Porter JB, Williams HJM, Leftley M (1982) Pruritus after administration of hetastarch. BMJ 284: 385–386

    Google Scholar 

  20. Parth E, Jurecka W, Szépfalusi Z, Schimetta W, Gebhart W, Scheiner O, Kraft D (1992) Histological and immunohistochemical investigations of hydroxyethylstarch deposits in rat tissues. Eur Surg Res 24: 13–21

    Google Scholar 

  21. Potter B, Medenica M (1968) Ultramicroscopic phagocytosis of synthetic melanin by epidermal cell in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 51: 300–303

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ramono EL, Ramono M (1977) Staphylococcal protein A bound to colloidal gold: a useful reagent to label antigenantibody sites in electron microscopy. Immunochemistry 14: 711–715

    Google Scholar 

  23. Richter W, Hedin H (1983) Solutions and emulsions used for intravenous infusions. In: Weck AL de, Bundgaard H (eds) Handbook of experimental pharmacology, vol 63. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 581–626

    Google Scholar 

  24. Richter W, deBelder AN (1976) Antibodies against hydroxyethylstarch produced in rabbits by immunization with a protein hydroxyethylstarch conjugate. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 52: 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ring J, Me\mer K (1977) Incidence and severity of anaphylactoid reactions to colloid volume substitutes. Lancet I: 466–469

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schneeberger R, Albegger K, Oberascher G, Miller K (1990) Juckreiz — eine Nebenwirkung von HydroxyÄthylstÄrke (HES)? HNO 38: 298–303

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sirtl C, Laubenthal H, Dieterich HJ, Hugler P, Peter K (1990) Nebenwirkungen von künstlichen kolloidalen Plasmaersatzmitteln unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von HydroxyethylstÄrke (HES). Beitr Anaesth Intensivmed 31: 35–53

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thompson WL, Fukushima T, Rutherford RB, Walton RB (1970) Intravascular persistence, tissue storage and excretion of hydroxyethylstarch. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131: 965–972

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jurecka, W., Szépfalusi, Z., Parth, E. et al. Hydroxyethylstarch deposits in human skin — a model for pruritus?. Arch Dermatol Res 285, 13–19 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370817

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370817

Key words

Navigation