Skip to main content
Log in

Implementation of the transformation field analysis for inelastic composite materials

  • Originals
  • Published:
Computational Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

The transformation field analysis is a general method for solving inelastic deformation and other incremental problems in heterogeneous media with many interacting inhomogeneities. The various unit cell models, or the corrected inelastic self-consistent or Mori-Tanaka fomulations, the so-called Eshelby method, and the Eshelby tensor itself are all seen as special cases of this more general approach. The method easily accommodates any uniform overall loading path, inelastic constitutive equation and micromechanical model. The model geometries are incorporated through the mechanical transformation influence functions or concentration factor tensors which are derived from elastic solutions for the chosen model and phase elastic moduli. Thus, there is no need to solve inelastic boundary value or inclusion problems, indeed such solutions are typically associated with erroneous procedures that violate (62); this was discussed by Dvorak (1992). In comparison with the finite element method in unit cell model solutions, the present method is more efficient for cruder mesches. Moreover, there is no need to implement inelastic constitutive equations into a finite element program. An addition to the examples shown herein, the method can be applied to many other problems, such as those arising in active materials with eigenstrains induced by components made of shape memory alloys or other actuators. Progress has also been made in applications to electroelastic composites, and to problems involving damage development in multiphase solids. Finally, there is no conceptural obstacle to extending the approach beyond the analysis of representative volumes of composite materials, to arbitrarily loaded structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bahei-El-DinY. A. 1990: Plasticity analysis of fibrous composite laminates under thermomechanical loads. In: KennedyJ. M.; MoellerH. H.; JohnsonW. S. (ed.): Thermal and mechanical behavior of metal matrix and ceramic matrix composites. ASTM STP 1080: 20–39. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahei-El-DinY. A.; ShahR. S.; DvorakG. J. 1991: Numerical analysis of the rate-dependent behavior of high temperature fibrous composites. In: SinghalS. N.; JonesW. F.; CruseT.; HerakovichC. T. (ed.) Mechanics of composites at elevated and cryogenic temperatures. ASME AMD 188: 67–78. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • BellmanR. E.; KalabaR. E.; LockettJ. A. 1966: Numerical inversion of the Laplace transform. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • BenvenisteY. 1987: A new approach to the application of Mori-Tanaka's theory in composite materials. Mech. of Materials 6: 147–157

    Google Scholar 

  • ChristensenR. M. 1971: Theory of viscoelasticity, an introduction. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • ChristersenR. M. 1979. Mechanics of composite materials. John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DafaliasY. F.; PopovE. P. 1976: Plastic internal variables formalism of cyclic plasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 43: 645–651

    Google Scholar 

  • DvorakG. J. 1990: On uniform fields in heterogeneous media. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 431: 89–110

    Google Scholar 

  • DvorakG. J. 1991: Plasticity theories for fibrous composite materials. In: EverettR. K.; ArsenaultR. J. (ed.): Metal matrix composites, Mechanisms and properties, vol. 2: 1–77. Academic Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • DvorakG. J. 1992: Transformation field analysis of inelastic composite materials. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437: 311–327

    Google Scholar 

  • DvorakG. J.; BenvenisteY. 1992: On transformation strains and uniform fields in multiphase elastic media. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 437: 291–310

    Google Scholar 

  • DvorakG. J.; TeplyJ. L. 1985: Periodic hexagonal array models for plasticity analysis of composite materials. In: SawczukA.; BianchiV. (ed.): Plasticity today: Modeling, methods and applications, W. Olszak memorial volume, 623–642. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • EisenbergM. A.; YenC. F. 1981: A theory of multiaxial anisotropic viscoplasticity. J. Appl. Mech. 48: 276–284

    Google Scholar 

  • FindleyW. N.; LaiJ. S.; OnaranK. 1976: Creep and relaxation of nonlinear viscoelastic materials. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • GearC. W. 1971: Numerical initial value problems in ordinary differential equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • HillR. 1963: Elastic properties of reinforced solids: Some theoretical principles. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 11: 357–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindmarsh, A. C. 1974: GEAR: Ordinary differential equations system solver. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Report UCID-30001, Revision 3.

  • JohnsonW. S.; MirdamadiM.; Bahei-El-DinY. A. 1993: Stress-strain analysis of a [0/90]2s titanium matrix laminate subjected to a generic hypersonic flight profile. J. Composites Technology and Research, 15: 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • LawsN. 1973: On the thermostatics of composite materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 21: 9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • LevinV. M. 1967: Thermal expansion coefficients of heterogeneous materials. Mekhanika Tverdogo Tela. 2: 88–94, English Translation: Mech. of Solids. 11: 58–61

    Google Scholar 

  • MoriT.; TanakaK. 1973: Average stress in matrix and average elastic energy of materials with misfitting inclusion. Acta Metal. 21: 571–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah. R. S. 1991: Modeling and analysis of high temperature inelastic deformation in metal matrix composites. Ph.D. Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York

  • SkudraA. M.; AuzukalnsY. V. 1973: Creep and long-term strength of unidirectional reinforced plastics in compression. Polymer Mech. 6: 718–722

    Google Scholar 

  • SloanS. W. 1987: Substepping schemes for the numerical integration of elastoplastic stress-strain relations. Int. J. Num. Meth. Engng. 24: 893–911

    Google Scholar 

  • SternsteinS. S. 1977: Mechanical properties of glassy polymers. In: HermanH. (ed.): Treatise on Materials Science and Technology, vol. 10: part B 541–598. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SternsteinS. S.; HoT. C. 1972: Biaxial stress relaxation in glassy polymers: Polymethyl metchacrylate. J. Appl. Phys. 43: 4370–4383

    Google Scholar 

  • TEplyJ. L.; DvorakG. J. 1988: Bounds on overall instantaneous properties of elastic-plastic composites. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 36: 29–58

    Google Scholar 

  • WangY. M.; WengG. J. 1992: The influence of inclusion shape on the overall viscoelastic behavior of composites. J. Appl. Mech. 59: 510–518

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by S. N. Atluri, 4 September 1993

This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scienctific Research, and by the Office of Naval Research

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dvorak, G.J., Wafa, A.M. & Bahei-El-Din, Y.A. Implementation of the transformation field analysis for inelastic composite materials. Computational Mechanics 14, 201–228 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370073

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00370073

Keywords

Navigation