Skip to main content
Log in

Bioelektrische Aktivität und Sauerstoff-Verbrauch isolierter Potentialbildner bei Sauerstoffdrucken zwischen 0 und 10 Atm

  • Published:
Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

1. Relations of oxygen pressure (between 0 and 10 atm.) to simultaneously measured heights of b-wave and oxygen consumption have been studied in the isolated amphibian eye.

2. It was intended to ascertain, if there is—within the cell—a mechanism enabling it to hold its own O2 consumption and its biological function on a constant level regardless of changes in surrounding O2 pressure.

3. It was found that, within the range of oxygen deficiency, bioelectric activity and O2 consumption of isolated cells change proportionally to O2 pressure.

4. High oxygen pressure damps the bioelectric activity but has no hindering effect on O2 consumption. Therefore dissociation of bioelectric activity and O2 uptake arises, which means a lowering of efficiency.

5. There is no experimental evidence of a mechanism within the single cell for smoothing out the effects of O2 pressure changes. On the whole, the isolated cell reacts in view of O2 consumption and bioelectric activity like a pure physicochemical system. Therefore it seems to be reasonable to describe the cell-behaviour towards oxygen by means of the law of mass action or even by flux equations as Thunberg and Lund have tried many years ago.

6. In the whole animal the regulatable blood flow screens the individual cells from outside changes of oxygen pressure within wide limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Bauereisen, E.: Z. Biol. 105, 293 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauereisen, E.: Ber. Akad. d. Wissensch. Armenische S.S.R. (1957).

  3. Bean, J. W., and D. F. Bohr: Amer. J. Physiol. 142, 379 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blasius, W., u. H. Zimmermann: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 264, 618 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brodie, H. R., K. W. Cross and T. R. Lomer: J. Physiol. (Lond.) 138, 156 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dickens, F.: Neurochemistry. Springfield/Ill.: Thomas 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebbecke, U.: Ergebn. Physiol. 45, 34 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Flückiger, E.: Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta 14, 369 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch, H., K. H. Euler u. M. Schneider: Pflügers. Arch. ges. Physiol. 265, 281 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaplan, S. A., and S. N. Stein: Amer. J. Physiol. 190, 157 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kolthoff, J. M., and J. J. Lingane: Polarography. New York: Intersc. Publ. 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Küchler, G., A. Pilz, W. Sickel u. E. Bauereisen: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 263, 566 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Küchler, G.: Ber. XXIV. Kongr. Physiol. Ges. München 1958 und unveröffentlichte Untersuchungen.

  14. Ludwig, C., u. A. Schmidt: Arb. Physiol. Anst. Leipzig III/1/1868.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lund, E. J.: J. exper. Zool. 51, 265/291 (1928).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martius, C.: Ber. III. Internat. Kongreß Biochem. Brüssel 1956.

  17. Massion, W.: Klin. Wschr. 1955, 457.

  18. Pflüger, E.: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 10, 251 (1875).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pichotka, J., O. Creutzfeld u. W. Höfler: Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 225, 323 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pilz, A., W. Sickel u. R. Birke: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 266, 193 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ranke, O. F.: Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg: Springer 1950.

  22. Rothschuh, K. E.: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 249, 175 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rudolph, G., u. G. Puchstein: Z. ges. exp. Med. 126, 298 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt, W., u. M. Siess: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 263, 492 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schneider, M.: Persönl. Mitteilung.

  26. Sickel, W., E. Bauereisen u. H.-G. Lippmann: Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 266, 219 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sickel, W., u. H.-G. Lippmann: Naturwissenschaften 45, 67 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Teylor, F. D.: J. Physiol. (Lond.) 140, 23 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Thunberg, T.: Scand. Arch. Physiol. 17, 133 (1905).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wiesinger, K.: Helv. physiol. pharmacol. Acta 8, Suppl. VII, 1 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Herrn Professor Dr. U. Ebbecke zum 75. Geburtstag gewidmet.

Mit 6 Textabbildungen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bauereisen, E., Lippmann, G.H., Schubert, E. et al. Bioelektrische Aktivität und Sauerstoff-Verbrauch isolierter Potentialbildner bei Sauerstoffdrucken zwischen 0 und 10 Atm. Pflügers Archiv 267, 636–648 (1958). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362965

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362965

Navigation