Skip to main content
Log in

Erfahrungen mit der Öltropfenmethode zur Lokalisation der Mikroelektrodenspitze bei transtubulären Potentialmessungen an der Rattenniere

  • Kurzmitteilungen Und Methodisches
  • Published:
Pflüger's Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tiere Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The reliability of the method for locating the tip of a microelectrode in renal tubules described by Eigler for the Necturus kidney, was investigated in the rat kidney. The method, as originally described, involves the injection of an oil droplet into the tubular lumen upstream from the site of entry of the microelectrode. A reversible increase in electrode resistance during passage of the droplet down the tubule past the microelectrode tip is then taken as proof of intraluminal position of the electrode. In the rat nephron, we have observed, however, that such alterations in electrode resistance can occur even when the electrode is not located within the tubular lumen. Hence, in the present experiments, this method could not be used to distinguish between transtubular and transcellular potential differences. It was therefore concluded that previous measurements of electrical potential differences in rat proximal tubules in which the oil droplet method was used for locating the electrode tip [7–9] cannot be accepted with certainty as transtubular values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Boroffka, I.: Elektrolyttransport im Nephridium von Lumbricus terrestris. Z. vergl. Physiol. 51, 25 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eigler, F. W.: Short-circuit current measurements in proximal tubule of necturus kidney. Amer. J. Physiol. 201, 157 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frömter, E., u. U. Hegel: Transtubuläre Potentialdifferenzen an proximalen und distalen Tubuli der Rattenniere. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 291, 107 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  4. -- T. Wick u. U. Hegel: Untersuchungen zur Ausspritzmethode für die Lokalisation der Mikroelektrodenspitze bei transtubulären Potentialmessungen an der Ratte. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. (in Vorbereitung) (1966).

  5. Giebisch, G.: Electrical potential measurements in single nephrons of necturus. J. cell. comp. Physiol. 51, 221 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hegel, U., E. Frömter u. T. Wick: Der elektrische Wandwiderstand des proximalen Konvolutes der Rattenniere. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. (in Vorbereitung) (1966).

  7. Hierholzer, K., M. Wiederholt, H. Holzgreve, G. Giebisch, R. M. Klose, and E. E. Windhager: Micropuncture study of renal transtubular concentration gradients of sodium and potassium in adrenalectomized rats. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 285, 193 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kashgarian, M., Y. Warren, and H. Levitin: Micropuncture study of proximal renal tubular chloride transport during hypercapnea in rat. Amer. J. Physiol. 209, 655 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marsh, D., and S. Solomon: Relationship of electrical potential differences to net ion fluxes in rat proximal tubules. Nature (Lond.) 201, 714 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Whittembury, G.: Site of potential difference measurements in single renal proximal tubules of necturus. Amer. J. Physiol. 204, 401 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Woodbury, D. M., and J. W. Woodbury: Correlation of microelectrode potential recordings with histology of rat and Guinea-pig thyroid glands. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 169, 553 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit Unterstützung durch die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hegel, U., Frömter, E. Erfahrungen mit der Öltropfenmethode zur Lokalisation der Mikroelektrodenspitze bei transtubulären Potentialmessungen an der Rattenniere. Pflügers Archiv 291, 121–128 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362657

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00362657

Navigation