Skip to main content
Log in

A generalized model to predict the effect of voids on modulus in ceramics

  • Papers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An equation recently developed by the present author to describe the modulus of particulate composites as a function of the volume fraction of particles was modified in this study to describe modulus as a function of porosity. This new equation was applied to available modulus literature for ceramics where voids were the particulate phase. By varying the porosity interaction coefficient, σ, this new generalized void/modulus equation was shown to be able to yield equations previously used to predict modulus as a function of voids for ceramics. Wang theoretically described the mode of porosity interaction during compaction with a constant, α, to calculate the void/modulus relationship for three different compaction conditions. The generalized void/modulus equation developed in this study fit Wang's theoretical data exceptionally well, even though the porosity interaction coefficients, σ, obtained did not agree closely with Wang's values of α. Wang also experimentally measured the porosity and Young's modulus of manufactured alumina rods prepared with spherical and “egg-shaped” powders. The optimum fit for spherical particles occurred at σ=0.9 and an initial porosity of P i=0.405 and for “egg-shaped” particles at σ=1.05 and P i=0.475. The generalized void/modulus the equation for σ=−1 yields an equation that has the same form as Wang's proposed empirical equation that utilized two empirical constants, b and c. Wang's experimental data fitted with his proposed empirical equation gave a positive value for the constant c of 0.982 which corresponded to a negative value of P i of -0.0743 which was not defined in the theoretical considerations developed in this study. While this value of the initial porosity, P i, does give a better fit of the data for the interaction constant σ=-1, it still did not fit all the data as well as the results calculated for interaction coefficients nearer 1.0. The results of this study have shown that an excellent fit of most void/modulus data can be obtained using the generalized void/modulus equation developed in this study without making assumptions inconsistent with the theory presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. L. Coble and W. D. Kingery, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 39 (1956) 377.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eugene Ryshkewitch, ibid. 36 (1953) 65.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F.P. Knudsen, ibid. 42 (1959) 376.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. C. Wang, J. Mater. Sci. 19 (1984) 801.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Idem, ibid. 19 (1984) 809.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.K. Mackenzie, Proc. Phys. Soc. (Lond.) 63B (1) (1950) 2.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. Gatto, Allumino 19 (1) (1950) 19.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. M. Spriggs, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44 (1961) 628.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. F. P. Knudsen, ibid. 45 (2) (1962) 94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. I. Soroaka and P. J. Sereda, ibid. 51 (1968) 337.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. D. Carnahan, ibid. 51 (1968) 223.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D. F. Porter, J. S. Reed and David Lewis III, ibid. 60 (1977) 345.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. P. H. Hasselman, ibid. 45 (1962) 452.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. K. K. Phani, and S.K. Niyogi, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) 257.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. D. Agarwal, G. A. Panizza and L. J. Broutman, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54 (1971) 620.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Richard D. Sudduth, J. App. Polym. Sci. 48 (1993) 25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Idem, ibid. 48 (1993) 37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Idem, ibid. 50 (1993) 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Idem, ibid. 52 (1994) 985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Idem, ibid. 54 (1994) 1243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. K. Mcgeary J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44 (1961) 513.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Do Ik Lee, J. Paint Technol. 42 (1970) 579.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. George E. Dieter, “Mechanical Metallurgy” 2nd Edn (McGraw Hill, New York, (1976) p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Einstein, Ann. Phys. 19 (1906) 289.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Idem, ibid. (1911) 591.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. C. Drucker, “Introduction to Mechanics of Deformable Solids” (McGraw Hill, New York, (1967) pp. 64–5.

    Google Scholar 

  27. B. J. Budiansky, J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 13 (1965) 223.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jack C. Smith, J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 78A (1974) 355.

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Van Der Poel, Rheol. Acta 1 (1958) 198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. E. H. Kerner, Proc. Phys. Soc. B69 (1956) 808.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Z. Hashin and S. J. Shtrikman, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 11 (1963) 127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sudduth, R.D. A generalized model to predict the effect of voids on modulus in ceramics. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE 30, 4451–4462 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361531

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00361531

Keywords

Navigation