This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Blunt, Anthony, Artistic Theory in Italy, 1450–1600, Oxford, 1940.
Boring, Edwin G., “Visual Perception as Invariance,” Psychological Review, Vol. 59, March 1952, pp. 141–148.
Boring, Edwin G., “The Gibsonian Visual Field,” Psychological Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, May 1952, pp. 246–247.
Bunim, Marian Schild, Space in Medieval Painting and the Forerunners of Perspective, New York, 1940.
Burchett, R., Linear Perspective, London, 1872.
Burton, H. E., “The Optics of Euclid,” Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 35 (1945), pp. 357–372.
Carter, B. A. R., “Perspective,” in The Oxford Companion to Art, ed., Harold Osborne, Oxford, 1970, pp. 840–861.
Cohen, M. R., & L. E. Drabkin, eds., A Sourcebook in Greek Science. Harvard, 1948 (1969).
Francastel, Pierre, La Figure et le Lieu, Paris, 1967.
Gibson, James J., “The Visual Field and the Visual World: A Reply to Professor Boring,” Psychological Review, Vol. 59, No. 2, March 1952, pp. 149–151.
Gibson, James J., The Perception of the Visual World, Boston, 1950.
Gibson, James J., The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Boston, 1966.
Gioseffi, Decio, “Perspective,” in Encyclopedia of World Art, Vol. XI, New York, 1966, pp. 185–222.
Gogel, Walter, C. “The Organization of Perceived Space, I: Perceptual Interactions,” and “II: Consequences of Perceptual Interactions,” Psychologische Forschung, Vol. 36 (1973), pp. 195–247.
Gogel, Walter C., “Size, Distance, and Depth Perception,” Chapter 8 of Handbook of Perception, Vol. 9, eds. E. C. Carterette & M. D. Friedmann, New York, 1978, pp. 299–333.
Gogel, Walter C., “The Common Occurrence of Errors of Perceived Distance,” Perception & Psychophysics, 1979, Vol. 25 (1), pp. 2–11.
Goodman, Nelson, Languages of Art, Indianapolis & New York, 1968.
Gordon, Jan, Modern French Painters, New York, 1923 (1970).
Hauck, Guido, Die Subjektive Perspektive und die Horizontalen des Dorischen Styls, Stuttgart, 1879.
Heath, Sir Thomas, A History of Greek Mathematics, Vol. I, From Thales to Euclid, Oxford, 1921.
Holt, E. G., A Documentary History of Art, Vol. I, Garden City, N.Y., 1957.
Ivins, William M., Jr., Art and Geometry, New York, 1946 (1964).
Kline, Morris, Mathematics in Western Culture, London, 1954.
Lindberg, David C., Theories of Vision from Al-Kindi to Kepler, Chicago, 1976.
Mach, Ernst, The Principles of Physical Optics, Dover, USA, 1953.
Manse, Robert, “This Curving World: Hyperbolic Linear Perspective,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 32 (Winter, 1973), pp. 147–161.
Panofsky, Erwin, “Die Perspektive als ‘Symbolische Form’,” Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg, Warburg Institute, University of London, 1967.
Pedretti, Carlo, “Leonardo on Curvilinear Perspective,” Bibliotheque d'Humanisme et Renaissance, Vol. 25 (1963), pp. 69–87.
Pirenne, M. H., Optics, Painting and Photography, Cambridge, 1970.
Richter, Jean Paul, The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci, Vol. 1, New York, 1970.
Rock, Irvin, An Introduction to Perception, New York & London, 1975.
Ronchi, Vasco, “Classical Optics is a Mathematical Science,” Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Vol. 1 (1961) No. 2, pp. 160–171.
Spencer, John R., Leon Battista Alberti, On Painting, translated with Introduction and Notes, New Haven & London, 1956.
Ver Eecke, Paul, Euclide, l'Optique et la Catoptrique, Paris, 1959.
White, John, The Birth and Rebirth of Pictorial Space, London, 1957 (1972).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by A. Seidenberg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brownson, C.D. Euclid's optics and its compatibility with linear perspective. Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. 24, 165–194 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357417
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00357417