Abstract
Temporally overlapping, spatially separated visual stimuli were used for studying perception of simultaneity and temporal order. Pairs of flashes each of 100 ms duration were presented with stimulus onset asynchronies of 0, 30, 50, and 70 ms. Three spatial arrangements of flash presentation were tested: 1) both flashes were presented foveally; 2) one flash was presented foveally and the other at 9 deg in the left visual hemifield; 3) one flash was presented foveally and the other at 8 deg in the right visual hemifield. Onset asynchronies of 30 and 50 ms were not sufficient for correct identification of temporal order although the flashes were not perceived as simultaneous. Analysis of the response distributions suggests the existence of two-independent mechanisms for evaluating temporal interrelations: one for detecting simultaneity and the other for identifying temporal order. A better detection of simultaneity was found when synchroneous flashes were presented together with pairs of flashes separated by larger onset asynchronies. Reading habits may explain only part of the left-right asymmetries of the response distributions. The possible lateralization of the two suggested mechanisms within the cerebral hemispheres is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan LG (1975) The relationship between judgements of successiveness and judgement of order. Percept Psychophys 18:29–36
Allan LG, Kristofferson AB (1974) Successiveness discrimination: two models. Percept Psychophys 15:37–46
Baron J (1969) Temporal ROC curves and the psychological moment. Psychonomic Sci 15:299–300
Collyer CR (1976) The induced asynchrony effect: its rol visual judgements of temporal order and its relation to other dinamic perceptual phenomena. Percept Psychophys 19:47–54
Corso GM (1980) Auditory temporal order and perceived fusion-nonfusion. Percept Psychophys 28:465–470
Corwin TR, Boynton RM (1968) Transitivity of visual judgements of simultaneity. J Exp Psychol 78:560–568
Efron R (1963) The effect of handedness on the perception of simultaneity and temporal order. Brain 86:261–284
Ehrenstein WH, Manny K, Oepen G (1985) Foveal interocular time threshold and latency differences in Multiple Sclerosis. J Neurol 231:313–318
Galvin RJ, Regan D, Heron JR (1976) Impaired temporal resolution of vision after acute retrobulbar neuritis. Brain 99:255–268
Gibbon J, Rutschmann R (1969) Temporal order judgement and reaction time. Science 165:413–415
Hirsh IJ, Sherrick CE (1961) Perceived order in different sense modalities. J Exp Psychol 62:423–432
Oldfield RC (1971) Edinburgh handedness inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Rutschmann, R (1966) Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency. Science 152:1099–1101
Schieber F, Kline DW (1982) Age and the discrimination of visual successiveness. Exp Aging Res 8:159–161
Sekuler R, Tynan P, Levinson E (1973) Visual temporal order: a new illusion. Science 180:210–212
Sternberg S, Knoll RL (1973) The perception of temporal order: fundamental issues and a general model. In: Kornblum S (ed) Attention and performance IV. Academic Press, New York, pp 629–685
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitrani, L., Shekerdjiiski, S. & Yakimoff, N. Mechanisms and asymmetries in visual perception of simultaneity and temporal order. Biol. Cybern. 54, 159–165 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356854
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00356854