Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy

  • Review Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lumbar spine disc disease has traditionally been treated surgically by laminectomy and manual removal of the offending disc material. Chymopapain was extensively used to decompress the disc pressure in a relatively noninvasive manner, but has been abandoned due to serious complications, including anaphylaxis and paraplegia. Onik introduced automated percutaneous discectomy in 1985. This procedure has proved safe and efficacious for treating lumbar disc disease without complications. It is performed on an out-patient basis under local anesthesia with minimal rehabilitation time. The success rate reported in a multi-institutional study with one year follow-up is approximately 75%. The majority of failures occur in patients with free fragments or spinal stenosis — both of which can be diagnosed preoperatively with good imaging examinations. Hence, the success rate can be expected to improve if preoperative imaging is relied upon to help choose appropriate patients. Over 30,000 percutaneous discectomy procedures have been performed. The only complication reported, disc infection, developed in fewer than 0.2% of cases. Automated percutaneous discectomy has the potential to treat a vast number of patients with lumbar disc disease who otherwise would have laminectomies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bocchi L, Ferrata P, Passarello F, Belloni G (1989) La nucleoaspirazione secondo Onik nel trattamento dell'ernia discale lombare analisi multicentrica dei primi risultati su oltre 650 trattamenti. Riv Neuroradiol 2:119

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davis GW (1988) Clinical experience with automated percutaneous discectomy. In: Onik G, Helms C (eds) Automated percutaneous discectomy. UCSF Radiology Research and Education Foundation, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  3. Davis GW, Onik G (1989) Clinical experience with automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop 238:98

    Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman WA (1983) Percutaneous discectomy. An alternative to chemonucleolysis. Neurosurgery 13:542

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hijikata S (1984) Percutaneous nuclectomy. Operation 38:507

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hijikata S (1989) Percutaneous nuclectomy: A new concept technique and 12 years' experience. Clin Orthop 238:9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hijikata S, Yamagishi M, Nakayama T, Oomori K (1975) Percutaneous discectomy: A new treatment method for lumbar disc herniation. J Tokyo Denryoku Hospital 5:39

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hijikata S, Nakayama T, Yamagishi M, Ichihara M (1979) Percutaneous nuclectomy. Seikei Geka 11:246

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoppenfeld S (1989) Percutaneous removal of herniated lumbar discs. 50 cases with ten-year follow-up periods. Clin Orthop 238:92

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kambin P, Gellman H (1983) Percutaneous lateral discectomy of the lumbar spine. Clin Orthop 174:127

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kambin P, Schaffer JL (1989) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy: Review of 100 patients and current practice. Clin Orthop 238:24

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maroon JC, Onik G, Sternau L (1989) Percutaneous automated discectomy: A new approach to lumbar surgery. Clin Orthop 238:64

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mink JH (1989) Imaging evaluation of the candidate for percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Clin Orthop 238:83

    Google Scholar 

  14. Monteiro A, Lefevre R, Pieters G, Wilmet E (1989) Lateral decompression of a pathological disc in the treatment of lumbar pain and sciatica. Clin Orthop 238:56

    Google Scholar 

  15. Onik G, Helms C, Ginsburg L, Hoaglund FT Morris J (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe: Porcine and cadaver model. Radiology 155:251

    Google Scholar 

  16. Onik G, Helms C, Ginsburg L, Hoaglund F, Morris J (1985) Percutaneous lumbar discectomy using a new aspiration probe. AJNR 6:290

    Google Scholar 

  17. Onik G, Maroon J, Helms C, Schweigel J, Mooney V, Kahanovitz N, Day A, Morris J, McCulloch J-A, Reicher M (1987) Automated percutaneous discectomy: Initial patient experience. Radiology 162:129

    Google Scholar 

  18. Onik G, Maroon J, Davis GW (1989) Automated percutaneous discectomy at the L5-S1 level: Use of a curved cannula. Clin Orthop 238:71

    Google Scholar 

  19. Onik G, Mooney V, Maroon J, Wiltse L, Helms C et al. (submitted for publication) Automated percutaneous discectomy: a prospective multi-institutional study

  20. Shepperd JAN, James SE, Leach AB (1989) Percutaneous disc surgery. Clin Orthop 238:43

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stern MB (1989) Early experience with percutaneous lateral discectomy. Clin Orthop 238:50

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suezawa Y, Jacob HAC (1986) Percutaneous nucleotomy: An alternative to spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 105:287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Helms, C.A., Onik, G. & Davis, G.W. Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy. Skeletal Radiol 18, 579–583 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355332

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355332

Key words

Navigation