Skip to main content
Log in

A self-referential ‘cogito’

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Descartes, René: 1973–1978, Oeuvres de Descartes, ed. Charles Adam and Paul Tannery, Nouvelle Présentation (J. Vrin, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gilson, Etienne (ed.): 1976, Descartes, René: Discours de la méthode, texte et commentaire (J. Vrin, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gueroult, Martial: 1953, Descartes selon l'ordre des raisons (Aubier, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hilbert, David: 1935, ‘Mathematische Probleme. Vortrag, gehalten auf dem internationalen Mathematiker-kongress zu Paris 1900’, reprinted in Hilbert, David: Gesammelte Abhandlungen (Springer Verlag, Berlin), pp. 290–329.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hilbert, David: 1905, ‘Über die Grundlagen der Logik und Arithmetik’, Verhandlungen des Dritten Internationalen Mathematikerkongresses in Heidelberg vom 8. bis 13. August 1904 (Teubner Verlag, Leipzig).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hintikka, Jaakko: 1962, ‘Cogito ergo sum: inference or performance?’, The Philosophical Review LXXI, 1, pp. 3–32; reprinted in: Willis Doney (ed.), Descartes, A Collection of Critical Essays (Anchor, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kant, Immanuel: 1956, Kritik der reinen Vernunft, ed. Raymund Schmidt (Meiner-Verlag, Hamburg).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loewer, Barry: 1981, ‘Descartes' skeptical and antiskeptical arguments’, Philosophical Studies 39, pp. 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sextus Empiricus II: 1935, Against the Logicians, ed. J. B. Bury, Loeb Library (Heinemann, London).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boos, W. A self-referential ‘cogito’. Philosophical Studies 44, 269–290 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354107

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354107

Navigation