Skip to main content
Log in

Segmented models for stress-strain diagrams

  • Published:
Wood Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Tension and compression stress-strain data from tests of wood specimens were mathematically described by 2- or 3-segment models, respectively. Three or four parameters are required by the segmented models, but these are easily obtained from regression analysis of the digitized data. One required parameter is Young's modulus. The model parameters varied with moisture content, and it was possible to regenerate typical stress-strain diagrams at a variety of moisture levels for use in a finite-element program. This form of analysis makes it possible to demonstrate statistically that wood stress-strain diagrams have an initial linear segment, and that the stress-strain diagrams are not entirely curvilinear as some have proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous 1983: BMDP Statistical Software: 1983 Printing with additions. Berkeley CA: University of California Press

  • Bach, L. 1966: Nonlinear mechanical behavior of wood in longitudinal tension. Ph.D. dissertation, State University College of Forestry at Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazan, I. M. M. 1980: Ultimate bending strength of timber beams. Ph.D. dissertation in Civil Engineering, Nova Scotia Technical College, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazhenov, V. A.; Perelygin, L. M.; Semenova, E. A. 1953: Testing compression strength of wood across the grain (Ob ispytanii drevesiny na szhatie poperek volokon). Akademiya Nauk SSSR, Trudy instituta lesa. Volume 9: 315–331. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, PST Cat. No. 163. OTS 60-51131. Available from National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, as Document Number TT 6051131

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Conners, T. E. 1985: The effect of moisture gradients on the stiffness and strength of yellowpoplar. Ph.D. dissertation in Forestry and Forest Products, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, A. G. H. 1942: Stress-strain relations in timber beams of Douglas fir. ASTM Bulletin 118: 19–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, S. J. 1965: Ultimate strength theory for rectangular wooden beams. In: Symposium on Timber and Timber Structures. Transactions of the Engineering Institute of Canada. EIC-65-BR & STR 13. 8 (A-16): 7–11

  • O'Halloran, M. R. 1973: Curvilinear stress-strain relationship for wood in compression. Ph. D. dissertation in Forest and Wood Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramberg, W.; Osgood, W. R. 1943: Description of stress-strain curves by three parameters. U. S. National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, Technical Note No. 902. U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute 1982: Statistical Analysis System. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, E. G. 1944: Strength properties of yellow poplar from West Virginia. Bulletin of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute 38(2). Engineering Experiment Station Series No. 59

  • Urbanik, T. J. 1982: Method analyzes analogue plots of paperboard stress-strain data. Tappi 65 (4): 104–108

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author gratefully acknowledges the discussions with Dr. T. E. McLain which helped to simplify these models

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conners, T.E. Segmented models for stress-strain diagrams. Wood Sci.Technol. 23, 65–73 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350608

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350608

Keywords

Navigation