Skip to main content
Log in

Karotypic characterization of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) with conventional, fluorochrome and restriction endonuclease-banding techniques

  • Published:
Marine Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A karyotypic analysis was carried out in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) using conventional banding techniques, fluorochromes and restriction endonucleasebanding. The standard karyotype of turbot is 2n=44 chromosomes, with 48 chromosome arms. Nucleolar organizer regions, which were localized in the short arm of Chromosome Pair No. 3, showed C-and chromomycin A3-positive staining. C-bands were mainly located at the centromeres, but were also present in some interstitial and telomeric locations. No differences were revealed among constitutive heterochromatin bands after treatment of fixed chromosomes with fluorochrome staining and restriction endonucleases. Digestion with DdeI restriction enzyme produced a pattern of interstitial banding which suggested some degree of differentiation along the chromosome arms in turbot. Neither variation in chromosome number of arm number nor polymorphism in nucleolar organizer regions was revealed in the turbot analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida-Toledo LF, Foresti F, Toledo FSA (1981) Constitutive heterochromatin and nucleolus organizer region in knifefish Apteronotus albifrons (Pisces, Apteronotidae). Experientia 37:953–954

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya CT, Bickham JW, Gold JR (1984) A cell culture technique for chromosome preparation in cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1984:232–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker CJ (1972) A method for the display of chromosomes of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa, and other marine fishes. Copeia 1972: 365–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanquer A, Alayse JP, Berrada-Rkhami O, Berrebi P (1992) Allozyme variation in turbot (Psetta maxima) and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus) (Osteichthyes, Pleuronectiformes, Scophthalmidae) throughout their range in Europe. J Fish Biol 41:725–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Brulé T (1989) Analysis of the enzyme polymorphism in a plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., population from the north-west coast of Brittany, France. J Fish Biol 35:607–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Z, Fox DP (1990) A new method for fish chromosome preparation. J Fish Biol 37:553–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan Z, Fox DP (1991) Robertsonian polymorphism in plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., and cod, Gadus morhua L. (Pisces Pleuronectiformes and Gadiformes). J Fish Biol 38:635–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka H, Niiyama H (1970) Notes on the somatic chromosomes of ten species of pleuronected fishes. Chromosome Inf Serv 11:18–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR (1984) Silver-staining and heteromorphism of chromosomal nucleolus organizer regions in North American cyprinid fishes. Copeia 1984:133–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold JR, Li YC, Shipley NS, Powers PK (1990) Improved methods for working with fish chromosomes with a review of metaphase chromosome banding. J Fish Biol 37:563–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley SE (1987) The chromosomes of salmonid fishes. Biol Rev 62:197–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley SE, Horne MT (1985) Cytogenetic techniques in fish genetics. J Fish Biol 26:575–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell WM, Black A (1980) Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a l-step method. Experientia 36:1014–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Tvanov VN (1969) The chromosomes of the Black Sea flatfish Rhombus maeticus Pallas. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR (Biol Sciences) 187:507–509 [Transl. Plenum Publishing Corp, Consultants Bureau, New York 1987]

    Google Scholar 

  • John B, King M, Schweizer D, Mendelak D (1985) Equilocality of heterochromatin distribution and heterochromatin heterogeneity in acridic grasshoppers. Chromosoma 88:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuno T, Ojima Y, Yamashita N (1986) Chromosomes of flounder, Paralichthys olvacceus. Proc Japan Acad 62:194–196

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrande WH (1975) Karyology of six species of Louisiana flatfishes (Pleuronectiformes: Osteichthyes). Copeia 1975:516–522

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez P, Viñas A, Bouza C, Arias J, Amaro R, Sánchez L (1991) Cytogenetical characterization of hatchery stocks and natural populations of sea and trown trout from Northwestern Spain. Heredity, Lond 66:9–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106:283–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S (1970) The enormous diversity in genome sizes of fishes as a reflection of nature's extensive experiments with gene duplication. Am Fish Soc 99:120–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohno S, Atkin NB (1966) Comparative DNA values and chromosome some complements of species of fishes. Chromosoma 18:455–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Patro R, Prasad PG (1981) Chromosomal studies in five Indian flatfishes. Copeia 1981:498–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips R, Ihsen PE (1985) Chromosome banding in salmonid fish: nucleolar organizer regions in Salmo and Salvelinus. Can J Genet Cytol 27:433–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocchi A (1982) On the heterogeneity of heterochromatin. Caryologia 35:169–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez L, Martínez P, Bouza C, Viñas A (1991) Chromosomal heterochromatin differentiation in Salmo trutto with restriction enzymes. Heredity, Lond 66:241–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez L, Martínez P, Viñas A, Bouza C (1990) Analysis of the structure and variability of nucleolar organizer regions of Salmotrutta by C-, Ag-, and restriction endonuclease banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 54:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D (1976) Reverse fluorescent chromosome banding with chromomycin and DAPI. Chromosoma 58:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith PJ, Fujio Y (1982) Genetic variation in marine teleosts: high variability in habitat specialists and low variability in habitat generalists. Mar Biol 69:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorgaard GH, Allen SK (1987) Chromosome manipulation and markers in fishery management. In: Ryman N, Utter F (eds) Population genetics and fishery management. Washington University Press, Seattle and London, pp 319–331

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by J. M. Pérès, Marseille

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bouza, C., Sanchez, L. & Martínez, P. Karotypic characterization of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) with conventional, fluorochrome and restriction endonuclease-banding techniques. Marine Biology 120, 609–613 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350082

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00350082

Keywords

Navigation