Summary
A field experiment was conducted to establish whether or not inter-and intraspecific competition occurs between two syntopic species of orb-weaving spiders. Replicated single-species and mixed-species adult populations of the basilica spider, Mecynogea lemniscata, and the labyrinth spider, Metepeira labyrinthea, were established at a range of densities on open experimental units in the species' natural habitat. Each experimental unit was a 4mx1.6mx1m wood frame supporting branches upon which introduced spiders built webs. Survival and reproduction on the units were monitored from 1 August through 1 November 1978,
There were no significant negative interspecific effects of density upon either survival or reproduction, which indicates that interspecific competition was not occurring during the experiment. There was statistically significant evidence of intraspecific competition between females for both species, but the negative density effects were small. They explained 5% of the variance in Mecynogea web height, 2% of the variance in Metepeira survival, and 1% of the variation in number of eggs per sac for Mecynogea.
Hence inter-and intraspecific competition was either absent or weak in 1978, despite the fact that a field experiment conducted the previous year (Wise 1979) demonstrated that prey abundance was limiting the egg production of both species. Evidence of food limitation in 1977 followed by only weak competitive interactions the following year suggests that the significance of resource limitation and competition may vary temporally for the basilica and labyrinth spiders.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atchley WR, Gaskins CT, Anderson D (1976) Statistical properties of ratios. I. Empirical results. Syst Zool 25:137–148
Barata JL, Wise DH Prey of two co-occurring orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneidae). In preparation for submission to J Arachnology
Colebourn PH (1974) The influence of habitat structure on the distribution of Araneus diadematus Clerck. J Anim Ecol 43:401–409
Enders F (1974) Vertical stratification in orb-web spiders (Araneida, Araneae) and a consideration of other methods of coexistence. Ecology 55:317–328
Kajak A (1967) Productivity of some populations of web spiders. In: K Petrusewicz (ed), Secondary productivity of terrestrial ecosystems. Pánstwowe Wydawn. Naukowe Warsawa p 807–820
Kaston BJ (1978) How to know the spiders, 3rd ed. Wm. C Brown Pub Co, Dubuque, Iowa, 272 p
Luczak J (1963) Differences in the structure of communities of web spiders in one type of environment (young pine forest). Ekol Pol Ser A II:159–221
Post WM III, Riechert SE (1977) Initial investigation into the structure of spider communities. I. Competitive effects. J Anim Ecol 46:729–749
Riechert SE (1978) Energy based territoriality in populations of the desert spider Agelenopsis aperta (Gertsch). Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:711–722
Riechert SE (1979) Games spiders play. II. Resource assessment strategies. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 6:121–128
Schaefer M (1978) Some experiments on the regulation of population density in the spider Floronia bucculenta (Araneae: Linyphiidae). Symp Zool Soc Lond 42:203–210
Uetz GW, Johnson AD, Schemske DW (1978) Web placement, web structure, and prey capture in orb-weaving spiders. Bull Brit Arachnol Soc 4:141–148
Vollrath F (1976) Competitive exclusion in tropical kleptoparasitic spider species in the genus Argyrodes (Arachnida: Araneae: Theridiidae). Ent Germ 3:104–108
Wiens JA (1977) On competition and variable environments. Amer Sci 65:590–597
Wise DH (1975) Food limitation of the spider Linyphia marginata: experimental field studies. Ecology 56:637–646
Wise DH (1979) Effects of an experimental increase in prey abundance upon the reproductive rates of two orb-weaving spider species (Araneae: Araneidae). Oecologia (Berl) 41:289–300
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wise, D.H. Inter-and intraspecific effects of density manipulations upon females of two orb-weaving spiders (araneae: araneidae). Oecologia 48, 252–256 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347972
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347972