Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological studies on the role of the periductal stroma in the regression of the human male Müllerian duct

  • Published:
Anatomy and Embryology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The regression of the male Müllerian duct has been studied in human embryos and fetuses by means of the semi-thin light microscopic technique and by electron microscopy. After completion of the duct's differentiation during week 7, a periductal stroma is formed by two types of mesenchymal-like cells: light, epitheloid cells originating from the coelomic epithelium and dark, fusiform cells of mesonephric origin. During week 9 these cells condense to a compact cuff in which the light cells occupy the inner core. The duct is entirely sealed by an epitheloid stratum of the periductal stroma. At the same time, the basal lamina thickens up to 300 nm by apposition of extracellular material. During weeks 10 to 12, the inner stromal core is invaded by dark fusiform cells from the peripheral stratum which intermingle with the light cells. The basal lamina dissolves, the epithelio-stromal interface becomes indistinct and finally disappears. During week 13 remnants of the Müllerian duct can be observed. They result from the complete merging of the ductal into the periductal compartment.

Müllerian duct regression is divided into two functional steps: First the duct is prevented from growth by the epitheloid cells of the stromal cuff. This process lasts for 2 to 3 weeks. In the second place the basal lamina breaks up under the influence of the dark stromal component. This event launches the regression proper and lasts for another 2 to 3 weeks. Necrosis of cells or programmed cell death does not play a decisive role in the regression of the human Müllerian duct.

In the upper, nonregressing part of the duct, light epitheloid cells are scarce and do not seal the duct. A periductal extracellular space is preserved during the entire period and the periductal stroma does not fuse with the duct's epithelium. The epithelio-stromal interface is maintained along this section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Cunha GR, Chung LWK, Shannon JM, Reese BA (1980) Stromalepithelial interactions in sex differentiation. Biol Reprod 22:19–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha GR, Chung LWK, Shannon JM, Taguchi O, Fujii H (1983) Hormone-induced morphogenesis and growth: Role of mesenchymal-epithelial interactions. Rec Progr Horm Res 39:559–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe PK, Swann DA (1978) The role of Müllerian inhibiting substance in mammalian sex differentiation. In: Johnson MH (ed) Development in mammals. vol 3. North-Holland Publ Comp, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 323–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Donahoe PK, Budzik GP, Trelstad R, Mudgett-Hunter M, Fuller jr A, Hutson JM, Ikawa H, Hayashi A, MacLaughlin D (1982) Müllerian-inhibiting substance: An update. Rec Progr Horm Res 38:279–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyche WJ (1979) A comparative study of the differentiation and involution of the Müllerian duct and Wolffian duct in the male and female fetal mouse. J Morphol 162:175–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi A, Donahoe PK Budzik GP, Trelstad RL (1982) Periductal and matrix glycosaminoglycans in rat Mullerian duct development and regression. Dev Biol 92:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein AF, Wartenberg H, Vossmeyer J (1971) Zur Cytologie der pränatalen Gonadenentwicklung beim Menschen. III. Die Entwicklung der Leydigzellen im Hoden von Embryonen und Feten. Z Anat Entwickl Gesch 135:43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Josso N, Picard JY, Tran D (1977) The antimüllerian hormone. Rec Progr Horm Res 33:117–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Josso N, Picard JY, Tran D (1980) A new testicular glycoprotein: Anti-Müllerian hormone. In: Steinberger A, Steinberger E (eds) Testicular development, structure and function. Raven Press, New York, pp 21–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost A (1947) Recherches sur la différenciation sexualle de l'embryon de lapin. III. Rôle des gonades foetales dans la différenciation sexuelle somatique. Arch d'Anat Micros 36:271–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Jost A (1953) Problems of fetal endocrinology: The gonadal and hypophyseal hormones. Rec Progr Horm Res 8:379–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil K (1977) Development and loss of androgen responsiveness in the embryonic rudiment of the mouse mammary gland. Dev Biol 61:358–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil K, Schwartz P (1976) Tissue interaction in androgen response of embryonic mammary rudiment of mouse: Identification of target tissue for testosterone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:4041–4044

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JM, Donahoe PK, Ito Y, Hendren III WH (1977) Programmed cell death in the Müllerian duct induced by Müllerian inhibiting substance. Am J Anat 149:353–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Price JM, Donahoe PK, Ito Y (1979) Involution of the female Mullerian duct of the fetal rat in the organ-culture assay for the detection of Mullerian inhibiting substance. Am J Anat 156:265–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Trelstad RL, Hayashi A, Hayashi K, Donahoe PK (1982) The epitheliomesenchymal interface of the male rat Mullerian duct: Loss of basement membrane integrity and ductal regression. Dev Biol 92:27–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Vossmeyer J (1971) Zur Cytologie der pränatalen Gonaden-Entwicklung beim Menschen. I. Die Histogenese des Hodens, an Eponschnitten untersucht. Z Anat Entwickl Gesch 134:146–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1978) Human testicular development and the role of the mesonephros in the origin of a dual Sertoli cell system. Andrologia 10:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1979) Der Mesonephros und die Gonadenentwicklung. Verh Anat Ges 73:385–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1981 a) Differentiation and development of the testes. In: Burger H, deKretser D (eds) The testis. Raven Press, New York, pp 39–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1981b) Primordial germ cells and prospermatogonia during organogenesis of the male gonad and development of the fetal testis. Fortschr Andrologie 7:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1982) Development of the early human ovary and role of the mesonephros in the differentiation of the cortex. Anat Embryol 165:253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartenberg H (1983) Structural aspects of gonadal differentiation in mammals and birds. Differentiation 23 (suppl.):64–71

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dedicated to Professor Dr. med. Dr. med. h.c. Hermann Voss on the Occasion of his 90th Birthday.

Supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wartenberg, H. Morphological studies on the role of the periductal stroma in the regression of the human male Müllerian duct. Anat Embryol 171, 311–323 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347020

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00347020

Key words

Navigation