Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of microbial-feeding nematodes and protozoa in the rhizosphere of different plants

  • Published:
Biology and Fertility of Soils Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The biomass of microbial-feeding nematodes and protozoa was measured in the rhizospheres of peas, barley, grass and turnips grown for 10 weeks in pots containing a clay-loam soil; in the rhizospheres of peas and barley grown for 3 weeks in a sandy soil; and in the rhizosphere of barley grown for 11 weeks in an unfertilised and a fertilised clay-loam soil. The nematode biomass was consistently larger in the rhizosphere of all plants in both soils than in the bulk soil, but the protozoa biomass showed a rhizosphere effect only under pea and fertilised barley. The biomass of nematodes in the rhizosphere (1.2–22.3 μg dry weight g-1 dry soil) was greater than the biomass of protozoa (0.1–3.2 μg g-1), and greater under pea>barley>grass>turnip. It is suggested that nematodes are more able to exploit low bacterial densities than protozoa and that they initially migrate into the rhizosphere from the bulk soil. In samples of potato rhizosphere from field-grown plants, the nematode biomass was also greater than the active and total protozoan biomass. It is argued that in the rhizosphere the biomass of microbially feeding nematodes exceeds that of protozoa and that nematodes are more important in terms of nutrient cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • anderson RV, Gould WD, Woods LE, Cambardella RE, Ingham RE, Coleman DC (1983) Organic and inorganic nitrogenous losses by microbivorous nematodes in soil. Oikos 40:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bamforth SS (1985) The role of protozoa in litters and soils. J Protozool 32:404–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag B (1974) Nematodes associated with forest and woodland trees in Scotland. Ann Appl Biol 77:41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1981) Protozoan grazing of bacteria in soil-impact and importance. Microb Ecol 7:343–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarholm M (1985) Possible roles for roots, bacteria, protozoa and fungi in supplying nitrogen to plants. In: Fitter AH (ed) Ecological interactions in soil. Special publication no. 4, British Ecological Society, Blackwell Oxford, pp 255–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire JF, Greaves MP (1967) Protozoa and bacteria in the rhizosphere of Sinapis alba L., Trifolium repens L. and Lolium perenne L. Can J Microbiol 13:1057–1068

    Google Scholar 

  • Darbyshire JF, Wheatley RE, Greaves MP, Inkson RHE (1974) A rapid micromethod for estimating bacterial and protozoan populations in soil. Rev Ecol Biol Sol 11:465–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Freckman DW (1982) Parameters of the nematode contribution to ecosystems. In: Freckman DW (ed) Nematodes in soil ecosystems. Universtiy of Texas Press, Austin, pp 81–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodey JB (1963) Soil and freshwater nematodes. 2nd, Methuen, London, John Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS (1986) Mineralization of nitrogen and phosphorus by mixed cultures of the ciliate protozoan Colpoda steinii, the nematode Rhabditis sp. and the bacterium Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 18:637–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths BS, Ritz K (1988) A technique to extract, enumerate and measure protozoa from mineral soils. Soil Biol Biochem 20:163–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson VE, Katznelson H (1961) The effect of plant roots on the nematode population of the soil. Can J Microbiol 7:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt HW, Cole CV, Klein DA, Coleman DC (1977) A simulation model for the effect of predation on bacteria in continuous culture. Microbiol Ecol 3:259–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt HW, Coleman DC, Ingham ER, Ingham RE, Elliott ET, Moore JC, Rose SL, Reid CPP, Morley CR (1987) The detrital food web in a shortgrass prairie. Biol Fertil Soils 3:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurley MA, Roscoe ME (1983) Automated statistical analysis of microbial enumeration by dilution series. J Appl Bacteriol 55:159–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC (1985) Interactions of bacteria, fungi and their nematode grazers: Effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol Monogr 55:119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingham ER, Trofymow JA, Ames RN, Hunt HW, Morley CR, Moore JC, Coleman DC (1986) Trophic interactions and nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid grassland soil. I. Seasonal dynamics of the natural populations, their interactions and effects on nitrogen cycling. J Appl Ecol 23:597–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Klemedtsson L, Berg P, Clarholm M, Schnürer J, Rosswall T (1987) Microbial nitrogen transformations in the root environment of barley. Soil Biol Biochem 19:551–558

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing D (1976) The soils of the country round Perth, Arbroath and Dundee. Memoir of the soil survery of Great Britain, HMSO, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Page FC (1967) Taxonomic criteria for Limax amoebae with descriptions of 3 new species of Hartmanella and 3 of Vahkampfia. J Protozool 14:499–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharmacia. Percoll methodology and applications. Pharmacia, S-751 82 Uppsala, Sweden

  • Schnürer J, Clarholm M, Boström S, Rosswall T (1986) Effects of moisture on soil microorganisms and nematodes: A field experiment. Microb Ecol 12:217–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN (1946) A method for estimating the numbers of soil protozoa, especially amoebae, based on their differential feeding on bacteria. Ann Appl Biol 33:112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh BN (1964) Soil protozoa and their probable role in soil fertility. Bull Natl Inst Sci India 26:238–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GS, Johnston CM, Cornforth IS (1983) Comparison of nutrient solutions for the growth of plants in sand culture. New Phytol 94:537–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlenius B (1968a) Influence of microorganisms and temperature upon some Rhabditid nematodes. Pedobiologia 8:137–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohlenius B (1968b) Studies of the interactions between Mesodiplogaster sp. and other rhabditid nematodes and a protozoan. Pedobiologia 8:340–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Stout JD, Heal OW (1967) Protozoa. In: Burgess A, Raw F (eds) Soil biology. Academic Press, London, pp 149–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor WD (1978) Growth responses of ciliate protozoa to the abundance of their bacterial prey. Microb Ecol 4:207–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood FH (1973) Feeding relationships of soil-dwelling nematodes. Soil Biol Biochem 5:593–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Woombs M, Laybourn-Parray J (1984) Feeding biology of Diplogasteritus nudicapitatus and Rhabditis curvicaudata (Nematoda) related to food concentration and temperature, in sewage treatment plants. Oecologia (Berlin) 64:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeates CW (1979) Soil nematodes in terrestrial ecosystems. J Nematol 11:213–229

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Griffiths, B.S. A comparison of microbial-feeding nematodes and protozoa in the rhizosphere of different plants. Biol Fertil Soils 9, 83–88 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335867

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00335867

Key words

Navigation