Summary
After cervical myelography by direct puncture at C 1/2 level, 120 patients were randomly allocated to one of two groups, in one the patients were allowed to be fully ambulant and in the other the regimen was bed rest for 24h. Questionnaires recording the frequency and severity of side effects were completed at intervals after the examination. Headache, nausea and vomiting were common; fits and mental changes occurred also but were uncommon. The incidence and severity of these side effects did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Macpherson P, Teasdale E, Macpherson PY (1983) Radiculography: is routine bed rest really necessary? Clin Radiol (in press)
Gore SM (1981) Assessing clinical trials — restricted randomisation. Br Med J 282:2114–2117
Skalpe IO, Amundsen P (1975) Thoracic and cervical myelography with metrizamide. Radiology 116:101–106
Sortland O (1977) Cervical myelography with metrizamide using lumbar injection. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 355:141–153
Ahlgren P (1977) Myelography with metrizamide in the cervical region. Acta Radiol [Suppl] (Stockh) 355:98–104
Keiffar SA, Binet EF, Esquerra JV, Hantman RP, Cross CE (1978) Contrast agents for myelography: clinical and radiological evaluation of amipaque and pantopaque. Radiology 129: 695–705
Sykes RHD, Wasenaar W, Clark P (1981) Incidence of adverse effects following metrizamide myelography in non-ambulatory and ambulatory patients. Radiology 138:625–627
Gulati AN, Donald A, Guadagnoli BA, Quigley JM (1981) Relationship of side effects to patients position during and after metrizamide lumbar myelography. Radiology 141:113–116
Robertson WD, Lapointe JS, Nugent RA, Robinson RG, Daly LF (1980) Positioning of patients after metrizamide lumbar myelography. AJR 134:947–948
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teasdale, E., Macpherson, P. Incidence of side effects following direct puncture cervical myelography. Neuroradiology 25, 85–86 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333297
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333297