Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of ethylene-propylene copolymers obtained with Ti, V and Zr catalyst systems

  • Published:
Polymer Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ethylene and propylene were copolymerized in n-heptane in the presence of high activity heterogeneous MgCl2/TiCl4 catalyst and homogeneous VOCl3 and Cp2ZrCl2 catalysts to study the effect on the catalyst to the microstructure and molecular weight distribution of the copolymer. The copolymer obtained with the zirconium catalyst was much more random in structure than that obtained with the vanadium and titanium catalysts and the molecular weight distribution was very narrow. Ethylene and propylene were also copolymerized in liquid propylene with MgCl2/TiCl4 and VOCl3 catalyst systems. These copolymers were column fractionated and the fractions were analysed by NMR spectroscopy and DSC. The fractions of the copolymer obtained with the titanium catalyst was found to have broader distribution in composition than the copolymer obtained with the vanadium catalyst. This probably explains the traces of crystallinity in the copolymer prepared with the titanium catalyst. However, no effect was seen on the glass transition temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kelly R, Garner H, Haxo H, Bingham W (1962) Ind Eng Chem Prod Res Dev 1:210

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cozewith C, ver Strate G (1971) Macromolecules 4:482

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter B, Russel K, Scammel M, Thompson S (1984) J Polym Sci, Polym Chem Ed 22:1383

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaminsky W, Miri M, Sinn H, Woldt R (1983) Makromol Chem, Rapid Commun 4:417

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaminsky W, Steiger R (1988) Polyhedron 7:2375

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mallin D, Rausch M, Chien J (1988) Polym Bull 20:421

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kaminsky W, Miri M (1985) J Polym Sci, Polym Chem Ed 23:2151

    Google Scholar 

  8. Soga K, Chi S-I, Ohnishi R (1982) Polym Bull 8:473

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kashiwa N, Yoshitake J (1984) Makromol Chem 185:1133

    Google Scholar 

  10. Doi Y, Ohnishi R, Soga K (1983) Makromolek Chem, Rapid Commun 4:169

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abis L, Bacchilega G (1986) Makromol Chem 187:1877

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kakugo M, Naito Y, Mizunuma K, Miyatake T (1989) Makromol Chem 190:849

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith W (1972) Rubber Chem Technol 45:667

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wigand G, Waldmann K (1968) Plaste Kautsch 15:718

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ogawa T, Tanaka S, Inaba T (1973) J Appl Polym Sci 17:319

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ogawa T, Inaba T (1974) J Polym Sci, Polym Phys Ed 12:785

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kelusky E, Elston C, Murray R (1987) Polym Eng Sci 27:1562

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kakugo M, Miyatake T, Mizunuma K, Kawai Y (1988) Macromolecules 21:2310

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gilet L, Grenier-Loustalot M-F, Bounoure J (1992) Polymer 33:4605

    Google Scholar 

  20. Holtrup W (1977) Makromol Chem 178:2335

    Google Scholar 

  21. Geerissen H, Schützeichel P, Wolf B (1990) Makromol Chem 191:659

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cheng H (1984) Macromolecules 17:1950

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scholte TH, Meijerink N, Schoffeleers H, Brands A (1984) J Appl Polym Sci 29:3763

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koivumäki, J., Seppälä, J.V. Comparison of ethylene-propylene copolymers obtained with Ti, V and Zr catalyst systems. Polymer Bulletin 31, 441–448 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329881

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329881

Keywords

Navigation