Skip to main content
Log in

The effects of between-habitat dispersal rate on protist communities and metacommunities in microcosms at two spatial scales

  • Community Ecology
  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of manipulation of between-habitat dispersal rates in multiple patch systems was examined experimentally using protist communities in laboratory microcosms. Replicate “landscapes” of eight microcosms (patches) at two spatial scales (patch sizes) were inoculated with 13 species of protists. Dispersal was carried out by transferring a small random sample of medium and protists from one randomly selected microcosm to another within a landscape. Four dispersal rates (24, 6, 2 and 0 transfers very 3 days) were used, and the microcosms were sampled after 6 and 12 weeks. Patch size had a consistent effect on within-path (community) and within-landscape (metacommunity) diversity, both being lower in small patch systems. Higher dispersal rates had a slight effect on community and metacommunity diversity after 12 weeks, with a tendency for higher dispersal to slightly offset the rate of loss of species. Both dispersal and patch size had effects on the abundance of many individual species, though in a variety of ways. The individual species results suggest that extinction is selective with respect to both patch size and dispersal rate treatments, and may be influenced by species interactions. It seems likely that in metacommunity systems of this sort, rather than mainland-island systems, the potential effect of between-patch dispersal rate in rescuing and recolonizing where local extinctions occur may be much reduced by the effect of selective extinction, relative to that expected under the assumption of random extinction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blake JG, Karr JR (1984) Species composition of bird communities and the conservation benefit of large versus small reserves. Biol Conserv 29:63–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H, Cohen JE (1991) Disturbance, interspecific interaction and diversity in metapopulations. Biol J Linn Soc 42:193–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson JE, Robinson JV (1985) Microcosms as islands: a test of the Macarthur-Wilson equilibrium theory. Ecology 66: 966–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson JE, Robinson JV (1986) The controlled assembly of microcosmic communities: the selective extinction hypothesis. Oecologia 71:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JA (1991) Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am Nat 137:1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake JA, Flum TE, Witteman GJ, Voskuil T, Holyman AM, Creson C, Kenny DA, Huxel GR, Larue CS, Duncan JR (1993) The construction and assembly of an ecological landscape. J Anim Ecol 62:117–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddison JC, Ollason JG (1978) Diversity in constant and fluctuating environments. Nature 275:309–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW, MacMahon JA (1982) Selective extinction and speciation: their influence on the structure and functioning of communities and ecosystems. Am Nat 119:480–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Gause GF (1935) Experimental demonstration of Volterra's periodic oscillation in the numbers of animals. J Exp Biol 12:44–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover JP, Lawton JH (1994) Experimental studies on community convergence and alternative stable states: comments on a paper by Drake et al. J Anim Ecol 63:484–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG, Allan JD, Colwell RK, Futyama DJ, Howell J, Lublin MD, Mathias J, Vandemeer JH (1968) The relationship between species diversity and stability: an experimental approach with protozoa and bacteria. Ecology 49:1091–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1987) Colonization of ephemeral habitats. In: Gray AJ, Crawley MJ, Edwards PJ (eds) Colonization, succession and stability. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 155–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gilpin M (1991) Metapopulation dynamics: brief history and conceptual domain. Biol J Linn Soc 42:3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastings A (1980) Disturbance, coexistence, history and competition for space. Theor Popul Biol 18:363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn HS, MacArthur RH (1972) Competition among fugitive species in a harlequin environment. Ecology 53:749–752

    Google Scholar 

  • Karieva P (1990) Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 330:175–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Karieva P, Wennergren U (1995) Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler SP, Morin PJ (1993) Food web architecture and population dynamics in laboratory microcosms of protists. Am Nat 141: 675–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (1993) Winter filtering, immigrant selection and species composition of insular mammals of Lake Huron. Ecography 16:24–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS (1974) The effects of space and enrichment on a predator-prey system Ecology 55:1142–1147

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS (1979) Regulation, stability, and diversity in a model experimental microcosm. Ecology 60:1098–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moilanen A, Hanski I (1995) Habitat destruction and coexistence of competitors in a spatially realistic metapopulation model. J Anim Ecol 64:141–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD, Atmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biol J Linn Soc 28:65–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JF, Harrison SP (1988) Effects of habitat fragmentation and isolation on species richness: evidence from biogeographic patterns. Oecologia 75:132–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve JD (1990) Stability, variability, and persistence in host-parasitoid systems. Ecology 71:422–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JV, Dickerson JE (1987) Does invasion sequence affect community structure? Ecology 68:587–595

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabelis MW, Diekmann O, Jansen VAA (1991) Metapopulation persistence despite local extinction: predator-prey patch models of the Lotka-Volterra type. Biol J Linn Soc 42:267–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter KC, Fawcett RF (1993) The ART test of interaction: a robust and powerful rank test of interaction in factorial models. Commun Statist Simula 22:137–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AD (1988) Large scale spatial structure and population dynamics in arthropod predator-prey systems. Ann Zool Fenn 25:63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AD (1990) Metapopulations, dispersal and predator-prey dynamics: an overview. Ecology 71:429–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AD (1991) Studying metapopulation effects in predatorprey systems. Biol J Linn Soc 42:305–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D (1994) Competition and biodiversity in spatially structured habitats. Ecology 75:2–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D, May RM, Lehman CL, Nowak MA (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson MH (1981) Island populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Warren, P.H. The effects of between-habitat dispersal rate on protist communities and metacommunities in microcosms at two spatial scales. Oecologia 105, 132–140 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328801

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328801

Key words

Navigation