Skip to main content
Log in

Scaling the effects of predation and disturbance in a patchy environment

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of hydraulic disturbances on the impact of two predatory benthic invertebrates on their prey were examined in a stream at two distinct spatial scales. At the scale of small habitat patches (0.0625 m2), hydraulic patch type was an important determinant of the microdistribution of prey and predators. Prey abundances were similar across all patch types at baseflow, but local densities were higher in patches identified as low-flow refugia after periods of high and fluctuating flow. The microdistribution pattern of predatory larvae of a caddisfly, Plectrocnemia conspersa, was similar to that of its prey, whereas predatory larvae of an alderfly, Sialis fuliginosa, did not shift their microdistribution significantly with discharge and were always most abundant in lowflow refugia. There was little evidence of an aggregative response of predators with prey, even though both predators and prey are mobile. Both predator species showed similar patch-specific patterns of per capita consumption rates: uniform consumption rates across hydraulic patch types at low and moderate flows, but highest in flow refugia during high flows. Species-specific patterns, however, were apparent in the magnitude and direction of differences between consumption rates during disturbance events, and in comparable patches at base flow: At high flow, consumption rates for P. conspersa were exaggerated (3.9 times higher) in flow refugia but “at par” in other patches; for S. fuliginosa they were “at par” in flow refugia but reduced in other patches (up to 3.3. times lower). These differences may be related to species-specific foraging behaviours (search vs ambush predators) and the influence of prey movements on feeding success. Using the patch-scale results only, it is difficult to predict the effects of physical disturbance on predation intensity at the larger scales of whole habitats, populations or communities. At the large scale (>200 m2), net predator impacts were estimated over the stream reach, using a spatially explicit model that accounts, in an additive way, for habitat heterogeneity and patch-specific responses of predators and prey. The relationship between predator impact over the whole reach and hydraulic disturbance differed for the two predators. The predator impact of S. fuliginosa decreased with increasing hydraulic disturbance, as predicted by the harsh-benign hypothesis. There was no directional trend for P. conspersa, however, and maximum predator impact may occur at intermediate disturbance levels. For the prey community in this stream, predation pressure from S. fuliginosa appears to fluctuate directly with the discharge hydrograph, whereas predation from P. conspersa may be more persistent. Flow refugia may play a dual role in the sructure of stream communities by preventing catastrophic mortality of animals (predators and prey) from physical forces during disturbances, and by maintaining (or perhaps increasing) predation pressure. Summing the effects of species interactions in small habitat patches to the larger scale of a whole stream reach indicates that the scale of approach influences the observed patterns and their implied underlying process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan JD (1982) Food consumption by trout and stoneflies in a Rocky Mountain stream, with comparison to prey standing crop. In: Fontaine T, Bartell S (eds) Dynamics of lotic ecosystems. Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, Mich, pp 371–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling PA (1992) The nature of the fluid boundary layer and the selection of parameters for benthic ecology. Freshwater Biol 28:273–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Closs GP, Lake PS (1994) Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of an intermittent-stream food web. Ecol Monogr 64:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap, Harvard, pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SD, Walde SJ, Peckarsky BL (1990) Prey exchange rates and impact of predators on prey populations in streams. Ecology 71:1503–1514

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JA, Barmuta LA (1989) An ecologically useful classification of mean and near-bed flows in streams and rivers. Fresh-water Biol 21:271–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi CM (1989) Movement patterns of invertebrates in temporary and permanent streams. Oecologia 78:199–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller PS, Gee JHR (1987) The analysis of community organization: the influence of equilibrium, scale and terminology. In: Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organization of communities: past and present. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 519–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller PS, Sangpraduh N, Towney H (1991) Catastrophic flooding and macroinvertebrate community structure. Verh Int Ver Limnol 24:1724–1729

    Google Scholar 

  • Giller PS, Hildrew AG, Raffaelli DG (1994) Aquatic ecology: scale, pattern and process. 34th Symposium of the British Ecological Society. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall SJ, Gurney WSC, Dobby H, Basford DJ, Heaney SD, Robertson MR (1994) Inferring feeding patterns from stomach contents data. J Anim Ecol 64:39–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen RA, Hart DD, Merz RA (1991) Flow mediates predatorprey interactions between triclad flatworms and larval blackflies. Oikos 60:187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart DD (1992) Community organization is streams: the importance of species interactions, physical factors, and chance. Oecologia 91:220–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins CP, Murphy ML, Anderson NH (1982) Effects of canopy, substrate composition, and gradient on the structure of macroinvertebrate communities in Cascade Range streams in Oregon. Ecology 63:1840–1856

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiman DR, Knight AW (1975) The influence of temperature on the bioenergetics of the carnivorous stonefly nymph, Acroneuria californica Banks (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Ecology 56: 105–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Giller PS (1994) Patchiness, species interactions and disturbance in the stream benthos. In: Giller PS, Hildrew AG, Raffaelli D (eds) Aquatic ecology: scale pattern and process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 21–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1976) The distribution of two predators and their prey in an iron-rich stream. J Anim Ecol 45: 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1980) Aggregation, interference and foraging by larvae of Plectrocnemia conspersa (Trichoptera: Polycentropodidae). Anim Behav 28:553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1982) Predators and prey in a patchy environment: a freshwater study. J Anim Ecol 51:797–815

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1987) Organization in freshwater benthic communities. In: Gee JHR, Giller PS (eds) Organization of communities past and present. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 347–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildrew AG, Townsend CR, Hasham A (1985) The predatory Chironomidae of an iron-rich stream: feeding ecology and food web structure. Ecol Entomol 10:403–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Huffaker CB (1958) Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27:343–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J (1988) Invertebrate predation and community structure in an acid stream. Ph.D. thesis, University of London

  • Lancaster J (1990) Predation and drift of lotic macroinvertebrates during colonization. Oecologia 85:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Hildrew AG (1993a) Characterizing in-stream flow refugia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 50:1663–1675

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Hildrew AG (1993b) Flow refugia and the microdistribution of lotic macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc 12:385–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Robertson AL (1995) Microcrustacean prey and macroinvertebrate predators in a stream food web. Freshwater Biol 34:123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1988) Competition for space by predators in streams: field experiments on a net-spinning caddisfly. Freshwater Biol 20:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1990) Stream flow and predation effects on the spatial dynamics of benthic invertebrates. Hydrobiologia 203:177–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Hildrew AG, Townsend CR (1991) Invertebrate predation on patchy and mobile prey in streams. J Anim Ecol 60:625–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster J, Real M, Juggins S, Beaumont W, Flower R, Montieth D (1996) Monitoring temporal changes in the biology of acid waters. Freshwater Biol (in press)

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmqvist B, Sjöström P (1984) The microdistribution of some lotic predators in relation to their prey and to abiotic factors. Freshwater Biol 14:649–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Marmonier P, Châtelliers MC (1991) Effects of spates on interstial assemblages of the River Rhône. Importance of spatial heterogeity. Hydrobiologia 210:243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason WT, Yevitch PP (1967) The use of phloxine B and Rose Bengal stains to facilitate sorting benthic animals. Trans Am Microscop Soc 86:221–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA (1976) Organization of the New England rocky intertidal community: role of predation, competition, and environmental heterogeneity. Ecol Monogr 46:355–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Moutka T (1993) Microhabitat use by predaceous stream insects in relation to seasonal changes in prey availability. Ann Zoo Fenn 30:287–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemi GP, Devore P, Detenbeck N, Taylor D, Lima A, Pastor J, Yount JD, Naiman RJ (1990) Overview of case studies on recovery of aquatic systems from disturbance. Environ Manage 14:571–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Arsenburger P, Martin AP, Denman DW (1996) Disturbance and patch-specific responses: the interactive effects of woody debris dams on lotic invertebrates. Oecologia 105:247–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1985) Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structre of stream insect communities colonizing enclosures? Can J Zool 63:1519–1530

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1991) Habitat selection by stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:1069–1076

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1989) Mechanisms of prey selection by stream-dwelling stoneflies. Ecology 70:1203–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Horn SC, Statzner B (1990) Stonefly predation along a hydraulic gradient: a test of the harsh-benign hypothesis. Freshwater Biol 24:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Petit F (1987) The relationship between shear stress and the shaping of the bed of a pebble-loaded river in La Rulles-Ardenne. Catena 14:453–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla

    Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL, Ward JV (1995) Herbivory under different flow regimes: a field experiment and test of a model with a benthic stream insect. Oikos 72:179–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn JM, Hickey CW (1994) Hydraulic parameters and benthic invertebrate distributions in two gravel-bed New Zealand rivers. Freshwater Biol 32:489–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli DG, Hildrew AG, Giller PS (1994) Scale, pattern and process in aquatic systems: concluding remarks. In: Giller PS, Hildrew AG, Raffaelli DG (eds) Aquatic ecology: scale, pattern and process. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 601–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson AL, Lancaster J, Hildrew AG (1995) Stream hydraulics and the distribution of microcrustacea: a role for refugia? Freshwater Biol 33:469–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Runck C, Blinn DW (1994) Role of Belostoma bakeri (Heteroptera) in the trophic ecology of a fishless desert spring. Limnol Oceanogr 39:1800–1812

    Google Scholar 

  • Sangpradub N, Giller PS (1994) Gut morphology, feeding rate and gut clearance in five species of caddis larvae. Hydrobiologia 287:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener TW (1986) Overview: kinds of ecological communities — ecology becomes pluralistic. In: Diamond J, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper and Row, New York, pp 467–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried CA, Knight AW (1976) Prey selection by a setipalpian stonefly nymph Acroneuria (Calineuria) californica Banks (Plecoptera: Perlidae). Ecology 57:603–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Woodster DE (1994) Prey behaviour, prey dispersal, and predator impacts on stream prey. Ecology 75:1199–1207

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46:337–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1988) Tactics, strategies and templets. Oikos 52:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley EH, Buschman DL, Boulton AJ, Grimm NB, Fisher SG (1994) Invertebrate resistance and resilience to intermittency in a desert stream. Am Midl Nat 131:288–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B (1988) Growth and Reynolds number of lotic macroinvertebrates: a problem for adaptation of shape to drag. Oikos 51:84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B, Müller R (1989) Standard hemispheres as indicators of flow characteristids in lotic benthic research. Freshwater Biol 21:445–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B, Gore JA, Resh VH (1988) Hydraulic stream ecology: observed patterns and potential applications. J North Am Benthol Soc 7:307–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Statzner B, Kohmann F, Hildrew AG (1991) Calibration of FST-hemispheres against bottom shear stress in a laboratory flume. Freshwater Biol 26:227–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1976) Field experiments on the drifting colonization, and continuous redistribution of stream benthos. J Anim Ecol 45:759–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1979a) Form and function of the prey catching net of Plectrocnemia conspersa larvae (Trichoptera). Oikos 33:412–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1979b) Resource partitioning by two freshwater invertebrate predators with contrasting foraging strategies. J Anim Ecol 48:909–920

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend CR, Hildrew AG (1994) Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biol 31:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Walde SJ (1986) Effect of an abiotic disturbance on a lotic predator-prey interaction. Oecologia 69:243–247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lancaster, J. Scaling the effects of predation and disturbance in a patchy environment. Oecologia 107, 321–331 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328448

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328448

Key words

Navigation