Abstract
A few species of squamate reptiles contain both oviparous (egg-laying) and viviparous (live-bearing) populations, and thus offer exceptional opportunities to test adaptationist hypotheses on the determinants of reproductive output. We focus on the hypothesis that maternal body-volume constrains reproductive output in squamate reptiles. If females are “full” of eggs, what happens when viviparity evolves within a lineage? Eggs increase in volume and mass during development, primarily due to the uptake of water, so how can they be accommodated within the mother's abdomen? We predict that the resultant increase in relative clutch mass (RCM) will be lessened by (1) a decrease in reproductive output (by reducing the number or size of offspring), and/or (2) an increase in maternal body-volume (via modifications of size or shape of adult females). Our comparisons of conspecific oviparous and viviparous lizards (Lerista bougainvillii) confirm that live-bearers carry heavier clutches (in both absolute and relative terms) and show the predicted shifts in body size and shape of reproductive females. However, offspring size and number were unaffected by the evolution of viviparity, and the shifts in maternal morphology were too small to fully offset the increase in clutch mass. Thus, RCMs increased by 50%, indicating that viviparous females produced clutches which more completely filled the space available in the abdominal cavity. We conclude that maternal body-volume does play a role in determining reproductive output, but that the observed clutch masses may be optimized, rather than maximized, with respect to the abdominal space available.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey RC (1992) Why we should stop trying to measure the cost of reproduction correctly. Oikos 65:349–352
Barden G, Shine R (1994) The effects of sex and reproductive mode on dietary composition in the scincid lizard Lerista bougainvillii. Aust Zool 29:225–228
Bauwens D, Thoen C (1981) Escape tactics and vulnerability to predation associated with reproduction in the lizard Lacerta vivipara. J Anim Ecol 50:733–743
Braña F, Bea A (1987) Bimodalité de la reproduction chez Lacerta vivipara (Reptilia, Lacertidae). Bull Soc Herp Fr 44:1–5
Congdon JD, Dunham AE, Tinkle DW (1982) Energy budgets and life histories of reptiles. In: Gans C, Pough FH (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 13. Academic Press, London, pp 233–271
DeMarco V (1993) Estimating egg retention times in sceloporine lizards. J Herpetol 27:453–458
Fairbairn J (1993) The maternal phylogeny of a reproductively bimodal skink. B.Sc. (Hons.) Thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Sydney
Greer AE (1989) The biology and evolution of Australian lizards. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, Australia
Gutzke WHN, Packard GC (1987) Influence of the hydric and thermal environments on eggs and hatchlings of bull snakes Pituophis melanoleucus. Physiol Zool 60:9–17
Hirshfield MF, Tinkle DW (1975) Natural selection and the evolution of reproductive effort. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:2227–2231
Phillips JA, Garel A, Packard GC, Packard MJ (1990) Influence of moisture and temperature on eggs and embryos of green iguanas (Iguana iguana). Herpetologica 46:238–245
Qualls CP, Shine R, Donnellan S, Hutchinson M (in press) The evolution of viviparity within the Australian scincid lizard Lerista bougainvillii. J Zool (Lond)
Roff DA (1992) The evolution of life histories; theory and analysis. Chapman and Hall, New York
Shine R (1980) “Costs” of reproduction in reptiles. Oecologia 46:92–100
Shine R (1983) Reptilian reproductive modes: the oviparity-viviparity continuum. Herpetologica 39:1–8
Shine R (1985) The evolution of viviparity in reptiles: an ecological analysis. In: Gans C, Billett F (eds) Biology of the reptilia, vol 15. Wiley, New York, pp 605–694
Shine R (1992) Relative clutch mass and body shape in lizards and snakes: is reproductive investment constrained or optimized? Evolution 46:828–833
Sinervo B, Huey RB (1990) Allometric engineering: an experimental test of the causes of interpopulational differences in performance. Science 248:1106–1109
Stearns SC (1984) The effects of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation in the life history traits of lizards and snakes. Am Nat 123:56–72
Stearns SC (1989a) The evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity. BioScience 39:436–445
Stearns SC (1989b) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268
Stearns SC (1992) The evolution of life histories. Oxford University Press, New York
Van Damme R, Bauwens D, Brana F, Verheyen RF (1992) Incubation temperature differentially affects hatching time, egg survival and sprint speed in the lizard Podarcis muralis. Herpetologica 48:220–228
Vitt LJ (1981) Lizard reproduction: habitat specificity and constraints on relative clutch mass. Am Nat 117:506–514
Vitt LJ, Congdon JD (1978) Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. Am Nat 112:595–608
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qualls, C.P., Shine, R. Maternal body-volume as a constraint on reproductive output in lizards: evidence from the evolution of viviparity. Oecologia 103, 73–78 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328427
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328427